| Revision as of 00:29, 21 January 2025 editSokoreq (talk | contribs)416 edits →January 2025: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:52, 21 January 2025 edit undoSokoreq (talk | contribs)416 edits OneClickArchived "Introduction to contentious topics" to User talk:Sokoreq/Archive 2Next edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| | minthreadsleft = 1 | | minthreadsleft = 1 | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == Introduction to contentious topics == | |||
| {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to '''post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people''', a topic designated as ''''']'''''. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>. | |||
| A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as ''contentious topics''. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the ]. When editing a contentious topic, Misplaced Pages’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Misplaced Pages ] have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project. | |||
| Within contentious topics, editors should edit <strong>carefully and constructively</strong>, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and: | |||
| *adhere to the ]; | |||
| *comply with all applicable ]; | |||
| *follow editorial and behavioural best practices; | |||
| *comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and | |||
| *refrain from ]. | |||
| <p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ''procedures'', you may ask them at the ] or you may learn more about this contentious topic ]. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. ] (]) 18:00, 7 January 2025 (UTC)</p>}}<!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first --> | |||
| :@] May I know why you are reverting my constructive edits, even though I have not added or deleted anything? Are you working with the organization and maintaining that article? If so, please disclose any ] you may have. If you have any issues with my edits, please discuss them with me before reverting them again and again. ] (]) 18:07, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thank you for starting a discussion on the matter. | |||
| ::I believe my edit summaries give some insight into why, but to clarify and go into further detail: | |||
| ::You have both deleted and added content. | |||
| ::You deleted content without explanation. | |||
| ::You added an unreliable source. | |||
| ::You reorganized the content in a way that changes the emphasis, de-emphasizing the overall context. | |||
| ::You duplicated references for some unknown reason. | |||
| ::My apologies, but I'll have little time over the next week or so to address this promptly. --] (]) 18:16, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :::@] Thanks, for your explanation, but I disagree with your repeated reverts of my edits. I aimed to create a criticism section to simplify the article. This behavior suggests you may have a personal connection to the subject or feel ownership over the article. I only agree that Newsweek (pre-2013) was a ], but articles after 2013 are generally not. I missed checking the source date. | |||
| :::but I hope you understand basics, that creating a new section or making minor formating edits doesn't change the overall context. Be ] but don't ] other editor through reverting there contrctive edits repeatedly, because your doesn't ]. | |||
| :::Please reread ] "''No one, no matter what, has the right to act as though they are the owner of a particular article (or any part of it)"'' ] (]) 10:40, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::::It seems you are ]. . Continuing in this manner will likely result in further blocks or bans. --] (]) 19:10, 13 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :::::@] I don't know what you are up to. You were acting as if you ] and had been reverting my edits repeatedly without explanation, and then you went away. This raises concerns that you may have some sort of conflict of interest with the subject, and this is why I had to go to the ]. | |||
| :::::If you have any disagreements, please discuss them with me or on the associated talk page before reverting my edits repeatedly. And remember again, ''no one has ownership of particular article or any part of it.'' ] (]) 11:25, 16 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::You have it completely backwards. You're the one that should have been discussing the matter rather than edit-warring with multiple editors. If you didn't learn that after being blocked for it, you are going to have great difficulty as an editor on Misplaced Pages. --] (]) 17:31, 16 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::@] You are the one who started removing/reverting repeatedly without discussing the matter with me. While I initiated this discussion to understand your disagreement, and when you left the discussion for days, another editor, who may work with you, did the same and pushed me to revert back again, and this ultimately led me to violate the ], I understand the Bbb23 reason for a one-week block, and I accept my mistake. This still does not give you ownership an article, and please don't start edit war again, and ]. ] (]) 18:24, 16 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::The onus is on you to get consensus for the changes you want to make. You will not be successful in reversing the burden of gaining consensus onto others. ] (]) 18:46, 16 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::@] Great, I appreciate this insight! But why are you here in this discussion? Where did you come from? ] (]) 19:34, 16 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::Your conflict with Hipal came to my attention when you posted to the COI noticeboard. Consensus there was that there was no COI, by the by - and yet I see you here continuing to make evidence-free claims of COI. You should stop doing that. See ], continuing to attack other editors in this way is itself a blockable offense. ] (]) 19:54, 16 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::::@] That COI discussion on the noticeboard has been archived, and I am just discussing my disagreement with Hipal to ]. | |||
| :::::::::::With respect, please don't comment on my talk page. I don't have anything to discuss with you. ] (]) 20:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for January 17 == | ==Disambiguation link notification for January 17 == | ||
Revision as of 00:52, 21 January 2025
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 29 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Disambiguation link notification for January 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Koneenica Banerjee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali films. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Kiran Vyas has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Misplaced Pages! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
ANU 10:39, 19 January 2025 (UTC)January 2025
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Misplaced Pages, you may be blocked from editing. Cambial — foliar❧ 00:24, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hey@Cambial Yellowing can you explain, why do you think this edit is disruptive ? Sokoreq (talk) 00:29, 21 January 2025 (UTC)