Revision as of 12:55, 22 January 2025 editEst. 2021 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers14,634 editsm Est. 2021 moved page Hail-shot Act 1548 to Draft:Hail-shot Act 1548: Not ready for mainspace, incubate in draftspace. Reason/s: custom reasonTag: moveToDraft← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:55, 22 January 2025 edit undoEst. 2021 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers14,634 edits AFC draftTag: moveToDraftNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Draft article}} | |||
{{Lead missing|date=January 2025}} | {{Lead missing|date=January 2025}} | ||
Under this act anyone, who was not a member of the ], was banned from firing hail-shot, meaning more than one pellet at a time. The prescribed penalty was a £10 fine and 3 months in prison. | Under this act anyone, who was not a member of the ], was banned from firing hail-shot, meaning more than one pellet at a time. The prescribed penalty was a £10 fine and 3 months in prison. | ||
Line 9: | Line 10: | ||
{{Uncategorized|date=January 2025}} | {{Uncategorized|date=January 2025}} | ||
{{Drafts moved from mainspace|date=January 2025}} |
Revision as of 12:55, 22 January 2025
This is a draft article. It is a work in progress open to editing by anyone. Please ensure core content policies are met before publishing it as a live Misplaced Pages article.
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Last edited by Est. 2021 (talk | contribs) 9 hours ago. (Update) Finished drafting? Submit for review or Publish now |
This article has no lead section. Please improve this article by adding one in your own words. (January 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Under this act anyone, who was not a member of the House of Lords, was banned from firing hail-shot, meaning more than one pellet at a time. The prescribed penalty was a £10 fine and 3 months in prison.
In 1592, John Baseden of Tenterden, a miller, was fined under this statute.
The act was repealed by the Militia Act 1694. The preamble in that act said that however useful it might have been back then, it had now fallen into disuse. However it needed repealing, because a number of malicious prosecutions citing this act had been launched of late.
References
- University of Houston O'Quinn Law Library Anglo American Legal Tradition Archive: http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/Eliz/KB29no229/aKB29no229fronts/IMG_0028.htm
- British History Online: Militia Act 1694 https://www.british-history.ac.uk/statutes-realm/vol6/p594