Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 19:23, 15 June 2007

Archives

/Archive 1

Civility

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at Talk:Walt Disney World Monorail System, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Metros 18:34, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

There were no personal attacks. HeadMouse 18:35, 15 June 2007 (UTC)HeadMouse

This is an incivil, personal attack. Metros 18:38, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Telling them that they need to chill out and let someone work THEN make a judgment. Whatever. HeadMouse 18:40, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Telling them to bite you? That's civil? Metros 18:46, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Writing un-signed comments to push what you want is generally not OK. Also, creating another page Walt Disney monorail System twice, is not acceptable, and next time, dont remove speedy notices, add {{hang on}}--trey 18:41, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

The other article was created to give readers a comparison and let them choose. HeadMouse 18:43, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

User:HeadMouse/Walt Disney monorail System

Your varient version of the monorail page was submitted for speedy deletion. I have declined the speedy, and instead have userfied the page at the above location. Creating varient pages in article space at varient names is a violation of WP:POINT. Working on your own versions in your user space is the more proper way to do things. Anyway, I know that you cannot currently respond to this FYI notice, as this talk page is protected, but I still felt I should let you know what has been done with the varient page. - TexasAndroid 18:42, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Please stop recreating the varient article in article space. This is disrupting the project to prove your point,which is expressly prohibited at WP:POINT. Continued recreation of this article will result in you being blocked again. Use the version I moved to your user space as your example version of your version. This is the proper place to show a varient version like you want to show. - TexasAndroid 18:50, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You are in violation of WP:POINT with your continual recreation of the varient monorail article in article space. If you recreate this article there one more time, you will be blocked for 24 hours. - TexasAndroid 18:56, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Misplaced Pages as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. - TexasAndroid 19:00, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

I don't know (nor care) who you are Texas, but you have NO IDEA whats going on here, and it seems you fail to try and find out, you just block for no reason. HeadMouse 19:04, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Probably not the best thing to attack an administrator. --trey 19:05, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Look up the word attack. I didn't attack anyone. I told Tex that he blocked me without getting any details about the issue. But I am sure he talked to YOU about it and got YOUR point of view and that was enough right? HeadMouse 19:08, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Actually, he didn't. He saw you running around starting edit wars and re-creating deleted material.--trey 19:09, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

and yet failed to find out the reasons, just ASSUMED (remember what I said about ASSUME)HeadMouse 19:10, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

I blocked you for the disruption of repeatedly recreating an article fork version in article space, even after I expressly refered you, multiple times to the proper way to handle your varient (the user-space version). You're right. I do not know the full picture of the situation, nor do I really need to know. I saw you disrupting the project, and warned you several times to stop the disruption, including pointing out to you the proper way to handle showing off a varient page. You chose to totally ignore my warnings, including a Final Warning that expressly said that, if you created it again, you would be blocked for 24 hours. You recreated it again, and thus, you are blocked. I may not know the full situation here, but I know disruption of the project, and what you were doing was definitely disruption. Thus the block. - TexasAndroid 19:11, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

See, you DID ASSUME. I was TRYING to resolve the issue at hand. the same way it was suggested yesterday. No you didn't look into deatail. I'd say you DO NEED TO KNOW before you just block someone.HeadMouse 19:14, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

I assumed nothing. Your actions were disruptive. You were creating a varient version of the article to prove a point that your version was better. That violates WP:POINT. Period. I gave you an outlet for your varient, and multiple warnings, including a Final Warning that stated exactly what was about to happen. You totally ignored all warnings. And thus we arrive at the current place and time. - TexasAndroid 19:15, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

And he has the right to do that. Being an administrator (like him), gives him the privilege to do that. That is why they invented the hell-hole known as WP:RfA. You could probably swim the pacific easier than passing a RfA, so if you do pass, you get certain privileges not available to editors like you and me.--trey 19:23, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

June 2007

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to Misplaced Pages. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on Talk:Walt Disney World Monorail System. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. that info is relevent --trey 18:46, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Take your own advice. YOU do not OWN the article. So when someone tries to edit it and clean it up WHILE LEAVIGN THE INFORMATIO YOU ADDED ALONE, you have no right to revert it over and over. Funny you violated the 3:RR rule and you were not blocked. HeadMouse 18:48, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

The information on the talk page is relevant to the discussion. Also, when reverting vandalism, the 3RR is not in effect.--trey 18:50, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

The information is archived if anyone needs to read it they can find it there. it has NOTHING to do with the "how this article looks" topic HeadMouse 18:51, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

More than one topic can be present on a talk page. It has to do with what version is better, and your massive breach's of policy, and your adding unsigned comments pretending to be someone else.--trey 18:53, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

I didnt pretend to be anyone else. HeadMouse 18:55, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Request for a breather

HeadMouse, can we all stop and discuss this before something bad happens? At the current rate you are violating Misplaced Pages rules, I fear you are going to be blocked or worse. --Kralizec! (talk) 19:00, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Thats what I am trying to do, But no, they want tpo pwoer trip and go off the deep end. thats why I created the other article, toe have a comparison and work ALL the useful information into one article, NO Trey has to be Mr "I own Misplaced Pages" and delete everything. I was not deleting ANYTHING he added to the article, I was cleaning it up and adding more information. Now I am blocked Seems to be a thing or wikipedia. lets not listen to members, just block them. HeadMouse 19:02, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Members who consistently ignore Misplaced Pages's official policies and guidelines are blocked in order to limit their damage to the rest of the project. You created Walt Disney monorail System three more times after an administrator told you not to. If a sports player ignored the rules of the game, surely you would expect a referee to eject them from the game. --Kralizec! (talk) 19:10, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Yes, and if anyone had bothered to read the posting at the top they would see that it was created for a comparison. Again, no one bothers to find reasons they just power trip and go on a blocking rage.HeadMouse 19:12, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Learn

Hey Trey, learn to create your own new toipcs, stop piggy backing off others. HeadMouse 19:06, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Lets put it this way

trey, Maelwys , Kralizec! TexasAndroid, You guys have your power trips. When I come back I will try again to resolve this. I am sure trey will be there to revert it all back without reading and waiting to see the new additions, but thats fine. I'll be there to fight my side of the battle.

I will say this once mer, not that I expect any of you to actually grasp it. I was not removing anything that trey added. I was simply cleaning the article up and putting images in place and adding more useful information. I really feel sorry for people looking for information about the WDW Monorail and finding this article. They will be really confused. Maelwya suggested yesterday that we compare the 2 articles and combine them. so thats what I tried to do. No trey had to keep reverting (which he was not blocked for because he claimed it to be vandalism even though it wasn't). SO I created an copy article for people to compare to, and it was deleted, so I gave reason for creating that article, then I was blocked. Wonderful way to run a site. I see now why no respecting educational system accepts Misplaced Pages as a resource for papers written. Anyway. Maybe in 24 hrs when I return, some may have chilled out and will open their eyes and let a resolution take place instead of thinking they own WIkipedia. HeadMouse 19:23, 15 June 2007 (UTC)