| Revision as of 00:50, 8 August 2007 editBetacommandBot (talk | contribs)931,490 edits your Non-Free image upload← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:27, 8 August 2007 edit undo67.90.197.194 (talk) False alarm.Next edit → | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] 00:50, 8 August 2007 (UTC) | If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] 00:50, 8 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == False alarm. == | |||
| Hello, I am one of the people who occasionally uses a machine with a public IP of 67.90.197.194. Recently, I read ] and noticed that it was flagged as needing a total rewrite and attention from an expert. As it happens, I am an expert, so I gave it my attention, making bold edits to remove an accumulation of text that, even charitably, can only be called nonsense. | |||
| I carefully erased only the very worst parts, fixing what I could, and left clear edit comments to explain my intentions. I am absolutely certain that a human being familiar with philosophy would recognize my edits as constructive, even if they disagreed with certain aspects. Unfortunately, your bot is only capable of recognizing that material was deleted, so it mistakenly flagged me as a vandal. I encourage you to look at my actual edits and see for yourself that they are not only constructive but badly needed. The article is a terrible mess, and the first step to remediation is to remove the erroneous portions. | |||
| What can I do to stop your bot from reverting my efforts? ] 18:27, 8 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:27, 8 August 2007
File:W4r010000000.jpg
oderint dum metuant
Let them hate, so long as they fear.
كانمةري وأتنيل جندي لبن مقية
w4r's anti-vandalism English Misplaced Pages semi-bot.
I am currently watching: ESEA, CAL, and CEVO, in
addition to general anti-vandalism measures and automated blanking rollbacks.
Please leave comments and any problems here.
Hi everyone.
Lolololol. ICAPTCHA 17:28, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Question
Just for the sake of clarification...are you saying on your user page and here that you're running a bot? Into The Fray /C 02:41, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
- Somewhat, it's a semi-bot on this account. I am using TW, along with popups and a few macros to check, usually while I'm browsing on another window. ACTool is pretty useful for macros, and it gets the job done. Never really had the time to code an actual fully automated bot. ICAPTCHA 02:51, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, I think I understand. I just want to make sure (for your sake) that you're not running anything that would be considered an unauthorized, unassisted bot. Do you have to review edits/reversions before they are saved? Into The Fray /C 03:01, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
- Gotcha! Thanks. Into The Fray /C 03:06, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:W4r010000000.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:W4r010000000.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:50, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
False alarm.
Hello, I am one of the people who occasionally uses a machine with a public IP of 67.90.197.194. Recently, I read Objectivity (philosophy) and noticed that it was flagged as needing a total rewrite and attention from an expert. As it happens, I am an expert, so I gave it my attention, making bold edits to remove an accumulation of text that, even charitably, can only be called nonsense.
I carefully erased only the very worst parts, fixing what I could, and left clear edit comments to explain my intentions. I am absolutely certain that a human being familiar with philosophy would recognize my edits as constructive, even if they disagreed with certain aspects. Unfortunately, your bot is only capable of recognizing that material was deleted, so it mistakenly flagged me as a vandal. I encourage you to look at my actual edits and see for yourself that they are not only constructive but badly needed. The article is a terrible mess, and the first step to remediation is to remove the erroneous portions.
What can I do to stop your bot from reverting my efforts? 67.90.197.194 18:27, 8 August 2007 (UTC)