| Revision as of 16:51, 27 July 2007 editCan't sleep, clown will eat me (talk | contribs)101,994 editsm Protected User talk:67.87.225.29: 6 months ← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:58, 17 September 2007 edit undoZzuuzz (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators136,930 editsm Changed protection level for "User talk:67.87.225.29": setting protection expiry (expires 01:17, 6 October 2007 (UTC))Next edit → |
| (No difference) | |
Revision as of 22:58, 17 September 2007
|
It is suspected that this user is a sock puppet of AFUSCO. Please refer to contributions for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks. |
- This is your one and only warning. If you continue to alter other users comments and sockpuppetry templates in order to disrupt Misplaced Pages, you will be blocked and this page will be protected from editing. - auburnpilot talk 21:41, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
autoblock?
{{unblock|i apoligize but i would like to continue editing[REDACTED] i am using both templates to make sure i supply the correct information. Also i have checked with my isp this ip address is static but it is used by multiple users including my neighbors that have permision to utilize my Wi-Fi network which uses wireless n next generation technoloy causing my networks range to be extended to many users (as many as 4 houses)}}
- See above. You're not blocked directly.--Chaser - T 02:18, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
{{helpme}}
users please contact an administrator to explain why the autoblock on this ip is being extended
- Is there anything I can help you with? Andy 00:43, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
See also
q:WQ:AN#ilikepie8. --Aphaia 11:44, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
67.87.225.29 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i have identified the vandalism source as my neighbors who thought it would be funny to vandalize[REDACTED] (router logs) i have threatened to secure my network and not allow them access if they continue (while they believe it may have been funny it is hurting my utilization of[REDACTED] to prevent vandalism i reccomend a softblock (i will create an account elseware for editing) thank you also if their is vandalism from the ip you can notify me by my account that i will create (name will be supplied after creation)
Decline reason:
Please email unblock-en-l using an Optimum Online email address with reference to this IP address so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. -- Netsnipe ► 04:57, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Seems to be a good explanation here. Jmlk17 03:48, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
- Considering this address has been used to produce multiple abusive sockpuppets and cross-wiki vandalism, I would not support this addressing being unblocked. An unsecured wireless connection is no better than an open proxy. If what you say in the unblock request is true, I would suggest you fully password protect your connection if you don't wish to suffer from future blocks. - auburnpilot talk 04:12, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thank you for the advice, admins i will e-mail unblock-en using yankeeman27@optonline.net, i have also decided to permanently revoke their access to[REDACTED] using this ip (website block of the wikipedia.org domain), thank you for the advice
Categories: