| Revision as of 21:53, 1 October 2003 edit80.255 (talk | contribs)1,936 edits response to Camembert← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:14, 19 October 2003 edit undo68.225.150.160 (talk) Concerns?Next edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| :: I wasn't trying to mislead, but in my experience they are still used. It no doubt varies from place to place, however. I think it's a little disingenuous to disregard 18,800 hits as being mostly genealogical sites, but I won't replace the term. Incidentally, the various watsonian vice-counties of yorkshire are also directly based upon the Ridings, and WVCs are most certainly used in modern, scientific contexts. ] 21:53, 1 Oct 2003 (UTC) | :: I wasn't trying to mislead, but in my experience they are still used. It no doubt varies from place to place, however. I think it's a little disingenuous to disregard 18,800 hits as being mostly genealogical sites, but I won't replace the term. Incidentally, the various watsonian vice-counties of yorkshire are also directly based upon the Ridings, and WVCs are most certainly used in modern, scientific contexts. ] 21:53, 1 Oct 2003 (UTC) | ||
| :::Ayup yous! Quit yer bellyachin! The Yorkshire page, tis before 1974. The Ridings are archaic shires, sublets of the York duchy. I consider them all good to this page. We must have a Konungeriket Jøfurvik page too. We must have standarised structure here to compare with Scandinavian lands' provinces. My only problem is formatting the table on the side of the page. My Yorkieness has always been strong, much more so than many. York is my heart and soul. Expatriation is no fun. | |||
Revision as of 00:14, 19 October 2003
- although the Ridings still exist as histoic boundaries without which administrative boundaries could not be defined, and they are still used in many other areas.
Like what? --Camembert
yorkshire "west riding" shows that at least 18,800 peple use them, and that is only those on the internet. All the people I know from yorkshire both use and understand the ridings system, and to maintain factual accuracy in the article, I felt that this fact ought to be clarified. Before it read as if the Ridings suddenly "ceased to exist", and this is certainly not the case.
- I'm from Yorkshire, and I don't use the ridings system or come across it in life very much. I only understand it because I've made the effort to do so. Maybe people who remember the ridings refer to them in conversation, but I don't think it's used for any practical purpose (apart from clubs and so on established before 1974). A look at the first few pages of the Google search reveals that the vast majority of the hits use the term in a purely historical context (quite a lot of them are genealogical sites). So really, I think the "many other areas" bit is misleading. I'm taking it out. --Camembert
- I wasn't trying to mislead, but in my experience they are still used. It no doubt varies from place to place, however. I think it's a little disingenuous to disregard 18,800 hits as being mostly genealogical sites, but I won't replace the term. Incidentally, the various watsonian vice-counties of yorkshire are also directly based upon the Ridings, and WVCs are most certainly used in modern, scientific contexts. 80.255 21:53, 1 Oct 2003 (UTC)
- Ayup yous! Quit yer bellyachin! The Yorkshire page, tis before 1974. The Ridings are archaic shires, sublets of the York duchy. I consider them all good to this page. We must have a Konungeriket Jøfurvik page too. We must have standarised structure here to compare with Scandinavian lands' provinces. My only problem is formatting the table on the side of the page. My Yorkieness has always been strong, much more so than many. York is my heart and soul. Expatriation is no fun.