| Revision as of 16:07, 1 November 2007 editAltenmann (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers220,496 edits →Dance music← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:26, 1 November 2007 edit undoBobTheTomato (talk | contribs)2,842 edits →I'll try this here, then: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
| :::I am afraid you are mistaken about the number of people's opinion about the term "dance music" `'] 16:07, 1 November 2007 (UTC) | :::I am afraid you are mistaken about the number of people's opinion about the term "dance music" `'] 16:07, 1 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :Is it not better to do that than change all those articles which link to "dance music"? ] 16:04, 1 November 2007 (UTC) | :Is it not better to do that than change all those articles which link to "dance music"? ] 16:04, 1 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == I'll try this here, then == | |||
| You bring up the "are you still beating your wife" scenario as a ''red herring'' to distract. The problem with it is that you actually ARE doing what I said you were doing. I asked how that contributed to the "asking and talking" you were mentioning before, and you don't have an answer. The answer is clear and simple: it does not, which makes your complaints a bit hypocritical, I think. I'm quite certain this comment will be reverted, as you revert nearly all good faith attempts to disagree with you, but I wanted to respond to your ''red herring'' in a place where I at least knew you would read it. ] 17:26, 1 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:26, 1 November 2007
|
Any messages left here will probably not be unanswered. Article content is to be discussed on article talk pages (You may invite me there if you find my input important). |
Signpost updated for October 29th, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 44 | 29 October 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:56, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Electronic dance music
I noticed you reverting the edits by User:Bungalowbill. He started a move discussion at Talk:Electronic dance music if you wish to participate. Wickethewok 15:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Dance music
The last discussion regarding the "dance music" article resulted in a consensus regarding that it should refer to the modern electronic form, and that the content which was there should be moved to "dancing music". This has since been reverted with no discussion, which makes it a wrong revert and this is why i am changing this back to the state which it was agreed upon on the last discussion. if you wish to have a different way, please start a discussion and do not just revert the articles. Bungalowbill 15:46, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- You are mistaken about the consensus. You didn't read the discussion carefully. Please explain what makes you think that "dance music" is only "electronic dance music" `'Míkka 15:55, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- i do not believe that "dance music" is only "electronic dance music". But i do however believe when most people say "Dance music" they are refering to "electronic dance music" most commonly.
- This is also shown by the fact that hundreds/thousands of articles link to "dance music" as their genre (articles on songs, artists and albums). These are really meant to be "electronic dance music", but that phrase is never used, and so they link to dance music.
- My proposal is that EDM be moved to dance music. At the top of the article there should be a clear note that it refers to 'e.' dance music and link to the "dancing music" article for anyone looking for that information.
- i feel this system would work much better, and i don't believe many people will go to the "dance music" article and expect to find it about the traditional accompanyment (sp?).
- I am afraid you are mistaken about the number of people's opinion about the term "dance music" `'Míkka 16:07, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- i feel this system would work much better, and i don't believe many people will go to the "dance music" article and expect to find it about the traditional accompanyment (sp?).
- Is it not better to do that than change all those articles which link to "dance music"? Bungalowbill 16:04, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
I'll try this here, then
You bring up the "are you still beating your wife" scenario as a red herring to distract. The problem with it is that you actually ARE doing what I said you were doing. I asked how that contributed to the "asking and talking" you were mentioning before, and you don't have an answer. The answer is clear and simple: it does not, which makes your complaints a bit hypocritical, I think. I'm quite certain this comment will be reverted, as you revert nearly all good faith attempts to disagree with you, but I wanted to respond to your red herring in a place where I at least knew you would read it. K. Scott Bailey 17:26, 1 November 2007 (UTC)