Revision as of 10:38, 1 December 2007 editAlice (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,878 edits ===Fork substitution===← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:39, 1 December 2007 edit undoAlice (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,878 edits →Fork substitution: correct hierarchy of sub-sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
There is a ] in which you are mentioned and may wish to provide input. Best. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">] : ] </span></small> 09:36, 30 November 2007 (UTC) | There is a ] in which you are mentioned and may wish to provide input. Best. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">] : ] </span></small> 09:36, 30 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
==Fork substitution== | |||
I draw your attention to http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Rhodesia&oldid=175026836#More_irrational_reverts | I draw your attention to http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Rhodesia&oldid=175026836#More_irrational_reverts | ||
and I seek your acquiescence in the edit proposed. | and I seek your acquiescence in the edit proposed. |
Revision as of 10:39, 1 December 2007
“ | I believe that any study which would question and deconstruct rather than defend, excuse or accuse various institutions is worth the effort. | ” |
— Irina Livezeanu
|
Any messages left here will probably not be unanswered. Article content is to be discussed on article talk pages (You may invite me there if you find my input important). |
WP:ANI
There is a current debate in which you are mentioned and may wish to provide input. Best. Pedro : Chat 09:36, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Fork substitution
I draw your attention to http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Rhodesia&oldid=175026836#More_irrational_reverts and I seek your acquiescence in the edit proposed.
You may also wish to comment here, if you choose: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Alice.S&oldid=175027524#Edit_war Alice.S 10:38, 1 December 2007 (UTC)