| Revision as of 18:20, 3 December 2007 editAnythingyouwant (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors91,261 editsm →Hey Ferrylodge!← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:01, 8 December 2007 edit undoStrider12 (talk | contribs)1,243 edits →Editors needed to stifle purging of pro-life material: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| ::Thanks. Things didn't turn out quite as bad as they seemed to be heading, at the ArbCom. So, I'll hang around awhile longer, I guess. :)] 18:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC) | ::Thanks. Things didn't turn out quite as bad as they seemed to be heading, at the ArbCom. So, I'll hang around awhile longer, I guess. :)] 18:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == Editors needed to stifle purging of pro-life material == | |||
| Hi, would you be willing to jump into the discussion page at ] -- and bring some friends. A group of editors have openly discussed "viligent" "purging" of information from peer reviewed sources which support the "controversial" idea that women who have abortions may suffer subsequent emotional problems. Though I have lots of expertise in the area, the "abortion is benign crowd and anyone who disagrees is untrustworthy" are in a revert war with me. I need more voices in there to remind them that deleting peer reviewed material goes against Wikpedia policy. I'd appreciate you adding this ] to your watch page and some periodic comments of support] (]) 04:01, 8 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:01, 8 December 2007
Archives
Archive 1: Beginning of Time to 14 March 2007 (plus one comment by Ferrylodge on 27 September 2007).
Archive 2: 14 March 2007 to 14 May 2007.
Archive 3: 14 May 2007 to 15 June 2007.
Archive 4: 15 June 2007 to 11 September 2007.
Archive 5: 11 September 2007 to 13 November 2007.
Archive 6: 13 November 2007 to 30 November 2007.
Hey Ferrylodge!
Great to have you back on here! I was really quite upset at your ban. Hopefully you will stick around.
Anyway, I'm just stopping by to say hello. I hope you are doing well. --Eastlaw (talk) 18:22, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- Just wanted to echo Eastlaw. Aloha and Welcome back! --Ali'i 16:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. Things didn't turn out quite as bad as they seemed to be heading, at the ArbCom. So, I'll hang around awhile longer, I guess. :)Ferrylodge 18:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Editors needed to stifle purging of pro-life material
Hi, would you be willing to jump into the discussion page at post-abortion syndrome -- and bring some friends. A group of editors have openly discussed "viligent" "purging" of information from peer reviewed sources which support the "controversial" idea that women who have abortions may suffer subsequent emotional problems. Though I have lots of expertise in the area, the "abortion is benign crowd and anyone who disagrees is untrustworthy" are in a revert war with me. I need more voices in there to remind them that deleting peer reviewed material goes against Wikpedia policy. I'd appreciate you adding this post-abortion syndrome to your watch page and some periodic comments of supportStrider12 (talk) 04:01, 8 December 2007 (UTC)