| Revision as of 09:09, 6 January 2008 editRandomXYZb (talk | contribs)15,343 edits Replying← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:09, 6 January 2008 edit undoRandomXYZb (talk | contribs)15,343 edits Fixing wikilinkNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| I wonder if your username, when taken in conjunction with the fact that the only three edits you have made are reverting (directly or indirectly) edits by ] is in breach of the username policy, as it is not a huge leap to read it as being aimed at that user. Is this the case? ] <sup>(], ])</sup> 12:12, 4 January 2008 (UTC) | I wonder if your username, when taken in conjunction with the fact that the only three edits you have made are reverting (directly or indirectly) edits by ] is in breach of the username policy, as it is not a huge leap to read it as being aimed at that user. Is this the case? ] <sup>(], ])</sup> 12:12, 4 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :No. NoCal is short for Northern California, where I hail from. Reading your above comment as well as the one you left on the administrator's noticeboard leads me to believe you are not assuming good faith. ] (]) 22:49, 4 January 2008 (UTC) | :No. NoCal is short for Northern California, where I hail from. Reading your above comment as well as the one you left on the administrator's noticeboard leads me to believe you are not assuming good faith. ] (]) 22:49, 4 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::Really? I'm sorry you feel that way, and if your edits entirely coincidental then I happily apologise. However, of the four edits you have made under a registered username (I'm not counting your response above and your insertion your userboxes on your userpage) two are to ] reinserting an inappropriate link removed (correctly, I believe) by Calton, and the other two are to ] where, without discussion, you have twice reverted Calton's amendments back to MegaMom's. ] <sup>(], ])</sup> 09:09, 6 January 2008 (UTC) | ::Really? I'm sorry you feel that way, and if your edits entirely coincidental then I happily apologise. However, of the four edits you have made under a registered username (I'm not counting your response above and your insertion your userboxes on your userpage) two are to ] reinserting an inappropriate link removed (correctly, I believe) by Calton, and the other two are to ] where, without discussion, you have twice reverted Calton's amendments back to MegaMom's. ] <sup>(], ])</sup> 09:09, 6 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 09:09, 6 January 2008
January 2008
Your recent edit to User:Sellick666 (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 20:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Your username
I wonder if your username, when taken in conjunction with the fact that the only three edits you have made are reverting (directly or indirectly) edits by User:Calton is in breach of the username policy, as it is not a huge leap to read it as being aimed at that user. Is this the case? Giles Bennett 12:12, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- No. NoCal is short for Northern California, where I hail from. Reading your above comment as well as the one you left on the administrator's noticeboard leads me to believe you are not assuming good faith. NoCal100 (talk) 22:49, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Really? I'm sorry you feel that way, and if your edits entirely coincidental then I happily apologise. However, of the four edits you have made under a registered username (I'm not counting your response above and your insertion your userboxes on your userpage) two are to Kate Mulgrew reinserting an inappropriate link removed (correctly, I believe) by Calton, and the other two are to User:Sellick666 where, without discussion, you have twice reverted Calton's amendments back to MegaMom's. Giles Bennett 09:09, 6 January 2008 (UTC)