Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 20:02, 6 January 2008

Welcome

Hello. Welcome to Misplaced Pages. I created your account for you.

See our introduction to become acquainted with Misplaced Pages, and move on to the tutorial which, I think, gives some very good information about editing that all Wikipedians should read.

There are lots of ways you can help with the encyclopedia; check out Misplaced Pages:Contributing to Misplaced Pages to find out how.

If you have any questions, you can ask on my talk page, check Misplaced Pages:Questions, or leave {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will be around to help shortly. Again, welcome, and happy editing! WODUP 06:43, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Your edits and comments on Morgellons are appreciated

So please do not feel your input is being ignored. IMO your response was measured and well expressed. The revision of your edit was not due any problem with you. There has been much division between editors on this article. Extraordinary levels of debate and emotion have been a constant theme there, and it has taken a lot of effort to keep the article from edit warring. I believe I should probably have taken more time to consider how to word the external links template so it clearly indicated multiple NPOV inputs may be needed to settle the issue among the editors. I firmly believe your input will be considered when the issue is resolved. Thanks again. Ward20 17:33, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for correcting my error on the relaxation technique page. Much obliged! WLU (talk) 19:03, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Exceptional Newcomer Award
		Impressive for someone with less than 200 edits! WLU (talk) 20:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

What a cool surprise! Thanks a lot! --Jack-A-Roe (talk) 20:59, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Shouldn't be a surprise, you're doing a great job and should expect, nay, demand! recognition. But you won't get it, so here's a barnstar instead. Also, if you like long reads, I've an essay I composed for noobs, you might find some useful stuff in it. Though maybe not given the quality of your contributions to date... WLU (talk) 21:02, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Some people put their preference at the top of the talk page, others do not. Generally I watch most user talk pages I post on and look for a reply when I've left a message. If I get a quick reply (i.e. we're posting in realtime) I usually bounce back and forth between reading on mine and replying on the other person's. If I'm not sure about a reply but it's important and I've replied on my own talk page, I usually leave a note on the person's talk page saying the reply is there. It usually works out, if it's important you'll tell them or make a point of reading their reply. WLU (talk) 21:07, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

merge proposal for complementary and alternative medicine articles

Due to your comments in talk, how about removing the merge proposal for complementary and alternative medicine articles banner from the article itself? -- John Gohde (talk) 20:11, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

No problem, it's done. --Jack-A-Roe (talk) 20:27, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

How about the alternative medicine and complementary medicine banners? -- John Gohde (talk) 20:49, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

Hi, Jack-A-Roe. I was just skimming the latest thread on the Bleep Talk page. I really appreciate your moderating influence. Thanks so much. TimidGuy (talk) 12:38, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Melon heads

Jack, thanks for contributing to the Melon Heads deletion talk. it's a long discussion to follow, but you'll note that the sources that you mention are the main point of contention RE: keeping vs. deleting part of the article: their reliability as valid sources is in question. Refer to the debate for more information.--Pgagnon999 (talk) 23:34, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

OK, I reviewed the discussion further and found another newspaper article. I've added a follow-up comment at the AfD. --Jack-A-Roe (talk) 00:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Oops!

Hi!

Sorry for accidentally reverting some changes you had made -- I had only looked at the top rev and didn't see that you had been working on it ... Sorry :)

Moogle10000 08:34, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

No worries - thanks for catching that and restoring my edits. --Jack-A-Roe (talk) 08:37, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

WP Search engine

Many thanks for this unexpected link, Jack, much appreciated; it looks good, I will use it and collate responses. thanks again! Peter morrell 09:08, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

NPOV Header in Lolicon Article

I noticed that you recently added an NPOV header to the article on Lolicon. Could you possibly explain how the neutrality of the text therein is biased or questioned? To me, it looks like a fair and balanced article. Thank you in advance, ~ Homologeo (talk) 19:59, 6 January 2008 (UTC)