| Revision as of 20:27, 25 January 2008 editSarah777 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers64,582 edits →Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot: c← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:35, 25 January 2008 edit undoWaggers (talk | contribs)Administrators46,846 edits →Your threats: not worth responding toNext edit → | ||
| Line 114: | Line 114: | ||
| :I denied no "fact". And what you choose to call "petty name-calling" (which you reported nonetheless) is a very richly deserved response to your continued threats. That ludicrous Arbcom decision only serves to facilitate your bully-boy tactics.] (]) 20:26, 25 January 2008 (UTC) | :I denied no "fact". And what you choose to call "petty name-calling" (which you reported nonetheless) is a very richly deserved response to your continued threats. That ludicrous Arbcom decision only serves to facilitate your bully-boy tactics.] (]) 20:26, 25 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::Note: Given that Sarah is blocked and her user talk page is protected, I see no merit in responding to the above at this time. Besides, there's nothing of any substance there to respond to, just a lot of posturing and trolling. ] (]) 21:35, 25 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:35, 25 January 2008
| This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot/Shadowbot3. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to User talk:Waggers/Archive 08. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
|
Welcome to my discussion page. -- Waggers.
By the way, you can email me if you want but I check this talk page more frequently than that email account. |
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
Jack Belton
Hi I see that you speedy deleted Jack Belton, which is fine (it was someone's joke a stub on thoroughly non-notable person).
However, I was disappointed to see that you followed up by deleting a series of backlinks. The links in Members of the 13th Dáil, Members of the 14th Dáil, Members of the 15th Dáil, Members of the 16th Dáil and Members of the 17th Dáil were all to this Jack Belton, who was for 17 years a member of Dáil Éireann, the lower house of the Irish parliament.
The article has not yet been written, but is quite proper to have redlinks to a requested article where the subject is clearly notable, a Belton is.
I have therefore restored the backlinks. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Request for comment on Category Redirect template
Because you are a member of WikiProject Categories, your input is invited on some proposed changes to the design of the {{Category redirect}} template. Please feel free to view the proposals and comment on the template talk page. --Russ (talk) 21:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Delyth Jewell
This person does exist and has a fair amount of links devoted to her on the internet. Nothing written was factually incorrect and below is a link to today's show on BBC Cymru on which she appears
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/aod/networks/cymru/aod.shtml?cymru/post_cyntaf_fri —Preceding unsigned comment added by Semipro2 (talk • contribs) 23:28, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:YFridayRevolution.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:YFridayRevolution.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:53, 15 January 2008 (UTC) Sorry, we weren't able to suggest any articles for you. Something is probably wrong on our end.
62.189.161.193
User talk:62.189.161.193 is at it again. On June 2007, you banned anon edits from this IP address. Please consider re-implementing the ban. Thanks! Groink (talk) 21:05, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Misplaced Pages better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Your threats
Great. So you keep harping on about "The Truth", bias and personal attacks and then in one post deny an established fact and engage in petty name calling. For goodness' sake, Sarah, grow up. Waggers (talk) 08:37, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- I denied no "fact". And what you choose to call "petty name-calling" (which you reported nonetheless) is a very richly deserved response to your continued threats. That ludicrous Arbcom decision only serves to facilitate your bully-boy tactics.Sarah777 (talk) 20:26, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- Note: Given that Sarah is blocked and her user talk page is protected, I see no merit in responding to the above at this time. Besides, there's nothing of any substance there to respond to, just a lot of posturing and trolling. Waggers (talk) 21:35, 25 January 2008 (UTC)