Revision as of 18:50, 21 January 2008 editCSTAR (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,870 edits →Please delete "User:CarlEHewitt" from the Misplaced Pages← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:34, 25 January 2008 edit undo12.49.221.91 (talk) →Please delete "User:CarlEHewitt" from the Misplaced Pages: Thanks for making these deletionsNext edit → | ||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
::Also please delete ] | ::Also please delete ] | ||
::Thanks, Carl Hewitt--] (]) 05:54, 21 January 2008 (UTC) | ::Thanks, Carl Hewitt--] (]) 05:54, 21 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::Thanks for making these deletions, Carl Hewitt--] (]) 22:34, 25 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::Wouldn't all these deletions violate the ]? — ] | ] 07:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC) | :::Wouldn't all these deletions violate the ]? — ] | ] 07:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::: In the expanding and ever more confusing set of principles (mis)guiding Misplaced Pages practice is the so-called "Right to Vanish" which I've seen applied in several cases. If Hewitt (or whomever) wants to vanish, then he/she should post the requests authenticated with a modification label in the diff associated to the account he/she wants deleted. In other words, log on as ] and make the request. This gives some evidence that the request was legitimate, namely that the requester knows the login password. | :::: In the expanding and ever more confusing set of principles (mis)guiding Misplaced Pages practice is the so-called "Right to Vanish" which I've seen applied in several cases. If Hewitt (or whomever) wants to vanish, then he/she should post the requests authenticated with a modification label in the diff associated to the account he/she wants deleted. In other words, log on as ] and make the request. This gives some evidence that the request was legitimate, namely that the requester knows the login password. |
Revision as of 22:34, 25 January 2008
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
Skip to table of contents |
Biography: Science and Academia Start‑class | ||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 8 June 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Please delete "User talk:CarlHewitt" from the Misplaced Pages
Please delete User talk:CarlHewitt from the Misplaced Pages.
Thanks,
Carl Hewitt--67.180.173.91 (talk) 05:44, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- done --CSTAR (talk) 07:39, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! Carl--98.207.43.7 (talk) 18:46, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Please delete "User:CarlEHewitt" from the Misplaced Pages
Please delete User:CarlEHewitt from the Misplaced Pages.
Thanks,
Carl Hewitt--98.207.43.218 (talk) 05:40, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Shouldn't request this be authenticated somehow? Interesting.--CSTAR (talk) 05:50, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Also please delete User:Prof. Hewitt
- Thanks, Carl Hewitt--76.126.57.246 (talk) 05:54, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for making these deletions, Carl Hewitt--12.49.221.91 (talk) 22:34, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- Wouldn't all these deletions violate the GDFL? — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 07:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- In the expanding and ever more confusing set of principles (mis)guiding Misplaced Pages practice is the so-called "Right to Vanish" which I've seen applied in several cases. If Hewitt (or whomever) wants to vanish, then he/she should post the requests authenticated with a modification label in the diff associated to the account he/she wants deleted. In other words, log on as User:CarlEHewitt and make the request. This gives some evidence that the request was legitimate, namely that the requester knows the login password.
- Wouldn't all these deletions violate the GDFL? — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 07:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- This isn't foolproof of course, but good enough.--CSTAR (talk) 17:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Doesn't the use of multiple socks preclude the "right to vanish"? Just curious. I also think he no longer has access to some of the accounts; at least his initial explanation for the use of socks is that he forgot the password of the original account. Furthermore, some IP is requesting edits of the CH article. If that's still the same "person" as (one of) these accounts, it doesn't quite fall under "right to vanish". But I could be wrong. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 18:36, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Your guess is as good as mine. Although I am willing to be loose and allow vanishing of various "instantiations".--CSTAR (talk) 18:50, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- Science and academia work group articles needing infoboxes
- Misplaced Pages requested photographs of scientists and academics
- Biography articles without infoboxes
- Misplaced Pages requested photographs of people
- WikiProject Biography articles