| Revision as of 21:36, 13 January 2008 editJehochman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers46,284 edits →Behave: clarify← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:53, 30 January 2008 edit undoProfg (talk | contribs)518 edits goneNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Gone... but not forgotten | |||
| <center><br><div style="align: center; width: 60%; padding: 1em; border: solid 2px gold; background-color: black;"> | |||
| <span style="color:white;font-weight:bold">S E M I - R E T I R E D</font>'''</div><br></center> | |||
| <center>'''This user is temporarily not very active on Misplaced Pages{{#if:{{{date|}}}| as of {{{date}}}|}}.'''</center> | |||
| {| align="center" class="notice noprint" style="background: none; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em auto;" | |||
| |- | |||
| | valign="top" style="padding: 0.1em" | {{tick|40}} | |||
| | style="padding: 0.1em" | | |||
| '''Your request to be unblocked''' has been '''granted''' for the following reason(s): | |||
| <br><br>{{userlinks|Profg}} is subject to a comprehensive editing restriction for six months. He limited to one revert per page per week (excepting obvious vandalism), and is required to discuss any content reversions on the page's talk page. If he exceeds this limit, fails to discuss a content reversion, or makes any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, he may be blocked. --] 22:51, 12 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ''Request handled by:'' ] 22:51, 12 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Request accepted (after-block request) --> | |||
| |} | |||
| {| align="center" class="notice noprint" style="background: none; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em auto;" | |||
| |- | |||
| | valign="top" style="padding: 0.1em" | {{tick|40}} | |||
| | style="padding: 0.1em" | | |||
| === ] === | |||
| Policy does not prohibit users from removing comments from their own talk pages, although ] is preferred. The removal of a warning is taken as evidence that the warning has been read by the user. Deleted warnings can still be found in the page history. | |||
| |} | |||
| {| align="center" class="notice noprint" style="background: none; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em auto;" | |||
| |- | |||
| | valign="top" style="padding: 0.1em" | {{tick|40}} | |||
| | style="padding: 0.1em" | | |||
| === ] === | |||
| If an editor removes a comment from their ], whether the comment is legitimate or not, '''do not add the comment back again'''. Respect their wishes. It's counter-productive to force the issue. | |||
| Note that users who repeatedly restore comments to a user's talk page more than three times in a 24 hour period may be ] for violating the ]. | |||
| |} | |||
| ==AfD nomination of ]== | |||
| I have nominated ], an article you created, for ]. I do not feel that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.<!-- Template:AFDWarning --> <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 10:56, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Talk about you on ] == | |||
| FYI, a discussion thread mentioning the proposal of blocking or banning you has been opened at ]. ] ] 13:39, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| There are quite a lot of users that support banning you from Misplaced Pages and any user that shares your viewpoint. | |||
| I would like to point out:<br /> | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Five_pillars<br /> | |||
| and<br /> | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:RS | |||
| If you or your friends write in a calm and polite manner and follow the advice in these two links, I don't support your ban. If you or your friends write in a combative manner and fail to follow the advice in these links, then that sort of participation in Misplaced Pages is not welcomed by me. I have not read any of your contributions so I have no knowledge of how you are writing. ] (]) 18:33, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Block notice== | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{time|}}}|You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''{{{time}}}'''|You have been temporarily ''']''' from editing}} in accordance with ] for {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{reason|}}}|'''{{{reason}}}'''|repeated ]}}. Please stop. You're welcome to ] after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{sig|}}}|] <sup>]</sup> 20:32, 12 January 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block2 --> | |||
| Per this on the ], I have blocked your account for one month. Misplaced Pages is not a battleground. It is clear that you are ] off-wiki for new editors to join the battle over several articles. Getting other people to engage in edit wars on your behalf is just as bad as doing these things yourself. You have been subject to revert limitations, and should know better. | |||
| Should you wish to be unblocked sooner than one month, I will consider whether you have ceased the canvassing activity. You may contact me by email, or request an independent unblock review. At the end of one month, administrators will review the situation to see if canvassing continues. If it does, the block may be extended. Sincerely, ] <sup>]</sup> 20:32, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Behave== | |||
| Start behaving! I disagree with the block because it is based on your call for others to improve wikipedia. The mob is doing just what you said, i.e. slamming you. | |||
| I do warn you that you are not the best poster child for censorship as you haven't acted so well in the past. This gives the mob an excuse to hang you. Please behave! | |||
| I am for fairness. I edit fairly. The film article you cite CAN be improved and made less of an attack piece. Controversial, it is. However, Wikipedians don't have to attack it. ] (]) 19:06, 13 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :As much as we have severe differences, I would agree with what is written above. If you can settle down and not continue to recruit people to cause a contentious editing environment, then I would support your return since you have been quite reasonable for a while since you were last unblocked. Please cooperate with your fellow editors.--] (]) 19:46, 13 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::We all seem to be in agreement. As I have said above, if the disruption stops, I will unblock the user. Canvassing for editors to overwhelm the opposition is not the way to develop a consensus. ] <sup>]</sup> 21:36, 13 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:53, 30 January 2008
Gone... but not forgotten