Misplaced Pages

User talk:SlamDiego: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:11, 12 February 2008 editTriberocker (talk | contribs)Rollbackers425 edits Push vandalism?← Previous edit Revision as of 04:19, 12 February 2008 edit undoSlamDiego (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,709 edits Push vandalism?Next edit →
Line 79: Line 79:


::::::You consider it being an asshole (and inappropriate) to want to know why you keep making this edit? Lighten up man. If you're that uptight about this whole thing, I don't even want an answer. Sheesh! '''**'''clicks ''unwatch: '''User talk:SlamDiego'''''** ~ ] (]) 04:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC) ::::::You consider it being an asshole (and inappropriate) to want to know why you keep making this edit? Lighten up man. If you're that uptight about this whole thing, I don't even want an answer. Sheesh! '''**'''clicks ''unwatch: '''User talk:SlamDiego'''''** ~ ] (]) 04:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

:::::::I'm evidently not the sort to lighten-up about a gang-rape, and about persistent attempts to ''erase'' it from history. And I'm glad to see the back of someone who apparently is such a sort. —]<sub><font size="-2">]</font></sub> 04:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


==]== ==]==

Revision as of 04:19, 12 February 2008

Contents
Orc Hives
Orc Hives
Some earlier messages may be found
 · in the first orc hive,
 · in the second orc hive,
 · in the third orc hive,
 · in the fourth orc hive,
 · in the fifth orc hive,
 · in the sixth orc hive,
 · in the seventh orc hive,
 · in the eighth orc hive,
 · in the ninth orc hive,
 · in the tenth orc hive,
 · in the eleventh orc hive, or
 · in the twelfth orc hive.
























This editor has too many irons in the fire, and may be suddenly inactive on Misplaced Pages for indeterminate intervals.
Click the “+” tab or this sentence to start a new discussion.


re: Jay Fawcett

Thanks for noticing this, I'd forgotten about it. I'm wondering if it should be nominated for deletion and see what comes of that. I still don't think that an unsuccessful candidate for Congress from one district in Colorado who has no other biography is notable. What do you think? Wildhartlivie (talk) 19:15, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

I agree. I'm not highly skilled in creating an AfD. Do you want me to do this or are you willing to go forward? Wildhartlivie (talk) 19:35, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. I'll jump in with an opinion. Wildhartlivie (talk) 19:40, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry!!

There must be a problem peculiar to the computer that I was using. I thought it was a problem with my own display, since I haven't seen it on anyone else's post, and I couldn't imagine that my computer was the only one to do this out of thousands that are linking to Misplaced Pages. Thanks for fixing the problem. I'll use undo if it happens again. It makes me look like a vandal, not a good idea if one is trying to argue in favor of keeping an article. If you happen to notice it with any other user, I'd be interested in learning about it. Again, sorry, thanks for apprising me to the problem and how to fix it. Mandsford (talk) 17:13, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

No problem. I was sure that it were an innocent mistake. —SlamDiego←T 05:05, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for advice

Thanks SlamDiego for your advice posted on my talk page. I reverted this action you refered to (in Teddy bear). I am a new to Misplaced Pages and very happy to receive input from more experienced users. Nahraana 12:43, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Push vandalism?

Why in the world would you tag your edit reversal with a push vandalism against me? I clearly explained myself in the talk page and it was only the second such edit I'd ever made on that page, albeit a constructive one. If you don't mind me asking, why are you so set on this staying on the page? It's obviously irrelevant and a complete non sequitur with the rest of the page. Do you like know the rape victim or something? I'm just curious how one person can be so uninvolved yet so inordinately passionate about a subject. ~ Triberocker (talk) 21:50, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism is defined on Misplaced Pages as
any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Misplaced Pages.
You are willfully seeking to compromise the integrity of Misplaced Pages by erasing a documented section which has already been successfully defended in mediation. You are doing this to protect the image of a fraternity, rather than just for the joy of trashing the Misplaced Pages, but it is still a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Misplaced Pages. The fact that you're commenting to the talk page doesn't change that. —SlamDiego←T 22:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

"...why are you so set on this staying on the page? It's obviously irrelevant and a complete non sequitur with the rest of the page. Do you like know the rape victim or something? I'm just curious how one person can be so uninvolved yet so inordinately passionate about a subject. ~ Triberocker (talk) 21:50, 4 February 2008 (UTC)"

You only answered half my question. ~ Triberocker (talk) 22:43, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Well, perhaps you want to complain about that somewhere. —SlamDiego←T 00:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
I am correct in believing this is your talk page, no? Please just answer my honest questions. Thank you for your valuable time. ~ Triberocker (talk) 03:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
If you think that your question is appropriate, and that I somehow owe you an answer, then perhaps you should contact an administrator to seek action against me. Suffice it to say that I think that you're behaving as a first-rate ass in even asking. —SlamDiego←T 03:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
You consider it being an asshole (and inappropriate) to want to know why you keep making this edit? Lighten up man. If you're that uptight about this whole thing, I don't even want an answer. Sheesh! **clicks unwatch: User talk:SlamDiego** ~ Triberocker (talk) 04:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm evidently not the sort to lighten-up about a gang-rape, and about persistent attempts to erase it from history. And I'm glad to see the back of someone who apparently is such a sort. —SlamDiego←T 04:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Timeline of cold fusion

A discussion that you were involved in was closed with the wrong closing decision. Please revisit the above link to review the article in question and your opinion given there. Thanks, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 17:29, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

User talk:SlamDiego: Difference between revisions Add topic