Revision as of 12:36, 16 February 2008 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 5 thread(s) (older than 18h) to User talk:AGK/Archive/21.← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:50, 16 February 2008 edit undoStealth500 (talk | contribs)Rollbackers1,466 edits →Rollbacker: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
|}</div> | |}</div> | ||
:My pleasure :) ] (]) 12:02, 16 February 2008 (UTC) | :My pleasure :) ] (]) 12:02, 16 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
== Rollbacker == | |||
So today I decided to undo my wrongings by helping undo vandalism..... 9hope thats a good thing), and I then looked up WP:Vandalism or something and I somehow got to here ]. And I was wondering what I should do and if I could get rollbacker ability... Thanks! --] (]) 23:50, 16 February 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:50, 16 February 2008
Gwernol
Dear AGK, a week or 2 ago I was warned by User:Gwernol. He accused me of vandalism on the Superbowl page. All I did was at the end of it I put the giants won (under what happened during the game). I now understand that it was vandalism, but at the point I really didn't. I then asked for more information but he has been gone for about 2 weeks it seems. So what I was wondering is if you could tell me if I am in trouble or anything because the last thing I want is to be banned..... Thanks. --Talk to Stealth500 (talk) 12:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- I can say if you are in any "trouble" for certain, as I do not know what edit for which it was you were warned. Can you provide me with a link, which documents the edit in which you inserted that information?
- In the meanwhile, I will issue some general advice—if you don't disrupt the encyclopedia, and ensure all of your edits will help, rather than hinder, the project, then you will never get into trouble, let alone be banned. Regards, AGK (talk) 12:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- This - is the edit Gwernol said I did and was vandalism and I got warned for it..... --Talk to Stealth500 (talk) 12:35, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- I can certainly see why it was interpreted as vandalism—on the face of it, your edit does appear to simply be the insertion of what is broadly defined as "nonsense edits": non-constructive insertions of text that bear no encyclopedic value.
- This - is the edit Gwernol said I did and was vandalism and I got warned for it..... --Talk to Stealth500 (talk) 12:35, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- However, I would encourage you not to take this too seriously. In future, you should phrase your additions in a more encyclopedic way, to make it more readable, and, indeed, more professional looking. Whilst I would argue against it being malicious vandalism, it was indeed unconstructive—I am sure you understand that. Perhaps, in future, you may simply wish to be a little less energetic in your wording? Regards, AGK (talk) 14:51, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, I think thats fair, Like I said I defenetly won't do it again since the last thing I want is a ban..... Thanks for answering this. Cheers! 02:52, 16 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stealth500 (talk • contribs)
Image:AGK_2.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:AGK_2.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 16:59, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
- Noted, with thanks. AGK (talk) 12:02, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Arbitration notice
The Arbitration notice you've crossposted across various places has a mistake in it: The last link (full enforcement) links to the wrong page - it links to Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration#Enforcement by block when it should link to Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Waterboarding#Enforcement by block. As a clerk, I think you should be the one to tinker with it. x42bn6 Talk Mess 18:52, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
- Goodness, that wasn't very smart of me. I'll fix as many instances of it as I can, although it's not a huge disaster—it is usually only the remedies that are included in the case summary, rather than both remedies and enforcements. Thank you for the notification—I would not have noticed :) AGK (talk) 12:01, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Doczilla's RfA
.: Oh, no! There goes To-ky-o! Admin Doczilla! :.
Thanks for !voting! Thank you for !voting in my RfA which resulted in the collapse of civilization with 92 (94?) support, 1 oppose, and 1 neutral. Blame jc37 and Hiding for nominating me, everyone who had questions or comments, everyone who !voted, everyone who tallied the numbers correctly, and WJBScribe who closed without shouting, "No mop for you!"
Seriously, your response has overwhelmed me. |
Doczilla RAWR! 06:15, 16 February 2008 (UTC) |
- My pleasure :) AGK (talk) 12:02, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Rollbacker
So today I decided to undo my wrongings by helping undo vandalism..... 9hope thats a good thing), and I then looked up WP:Vandalism or something and I somehow got to here WP:RBK. And I was wondering what I should do and if I could get rollbacker ability... Thanks! --Talk to Stealth500 (talk) 23:50, 16 February 2008 (UTC)