| Revision as of 23:59, 17 February 2008 view sourceTasc0 (talk | contribs)4,493 edits →Blocked: RE← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:03, 18 February 2008 view source Tasc0 (talk | contribs)4,493 edits Fuck this shit. I'm out.Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <center><big><big><big><big>R E T I R E D</big><br> | |||
| {{userinfo}} | |||
| '''Watchlist cleared out.''' | |||
| {{User:Tasc0/Navigation}} | |||
| </center> | |||
| {{Caution| | |||
| *Messages about images issues may be removed at any time. | |||
| *Please '''do not''' start a new thread to response to the one I created. | |||
| *I'll reply here at '''any''' thread, unless the opposite is specified.}} | |||
| {{archive box| | |||
| *] | |||
| *]}} | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Why remove the chronology? ] (]) 01:20, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Because it's extremely not necessary. And I have the feeling you're a ] <b><font color="#002BB8">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#002BB8">]</font></sup> 01:22, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::How is it not necessary? Someone's gonna read the article and see no chronology, and say "So none of them have released any albums after this one?". ] (]) 01:28, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::The article it's about the group, not each individual. <b><font color="#002BB8">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#002BB8">]</font></sup> 01:31, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::But still, HOW are they gonna know what their next albums are? ] (]) 01:34, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::In the article ] there's enough information about the group not being active any more and the only album released was ] <b><font color="#002BB8">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#002BB8">]</font></sup> 01:37, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::That doesn't answer my question. I mean their next albums as SOLO artists. ] (]) 01:39, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::That information can be found in the three members' articles. <b><font color="#002BB8">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#002BB8">]</font></sup> 01:42, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Untitled by ] == | |||
| Goldie Loc was born in February or March. If you don't believe me, his zodiac sign is pisces, and that's from February - March. | |||
| http://www.myspace.com/goldielocc <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 18:21, 15 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :MySpace it's not a reliable source. <b><font color="#002BB8">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#002BB8">]</font></sup> 22:45, 15 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Rollback == | |||
| Hi. I have removed your rollback privileges as you have been using the tool to revert edits in content disputes. Rollback or other similar tools should only be used for obvious vandalism. You should leave a meaningful edit summary for anything else. --] (]) 19:49, 15 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I wasn't awared of that. I will use the edit summary when I revert something that it is not a clear vandalism. <b><font color="#002BB8">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#002BB8">]</font></sup> 22:43, 15 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::I doubt you are going to find anyone willing to restore the rollback setting right now. After a couple of months of demonstrated proper use of edit summaries for anything other than reverting simple vandalism, you may wish to make another request at ]. --] (]) 23:36, 15 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::I told you I'll use it only for vandalism. If I don't do that, then just take it back. I've been in Misplaced Pages for over a year, you think I would lie about something like that? You see any block logs in my account? No. <b><font color="#002BB8">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#002BB8">]</font></sup> 23:49, 15 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::You're welcome to ask another admin or ask at ], but based on your recent contributions, I am not inclined to restore it. --] (]) 00:14, 16 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::That's because I wasn't awared that I only could use it to revert clear vandalism. <b><font color="#002BB8">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#002BB8">]</font></sup> 00:32, 16 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::I concur with B; ] is quite clear that it is for use only on vandalism. ] (]) 16:53, 16 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::And you are? <b><font color="#002BB8">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#002BB8">]</font></sup> 23:26, 16 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Why did you remove the release date? If you looked up Mail on Sunday on CDUniverse.com, it would say March 18, too. ] (]) 19:46, 16 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I removed it because that information was cited with a MySpace link. MySpace it's not a reliabe source. And CDUniverse.com isn't reliable as well. <b><font color="#002BB8">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#002BB8">]</font></sup> 23:25, 16 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Okay, I can see why Myspace woud be unreliable, but who are you to judge CDUniverse's reliability? Are you an admin? ] (]) 01:27, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::I don't need to be one. That web site it's extremly commercial and such sites generally are not reliable as sources. <b><font color="#002BB8">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#002BB8">]</font></sup> 01:28, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Well, where in ] does it say they're not a reliable source? That's a matter of personal opinion when not listed. ] (]) 03:00, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Not necessarily it has to be listed as no reliable source. Imagine how many links and web site that page would have. <b><font color="#002BB8">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#002BB8">]</font></sup> 04:23, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Blocked== | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] {{#if:24 hours|You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours'''|You have been temporarily ''']''' from editing}} in accordance with ] for {{#if:edit warring|'''edit warring'''|]}}. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:|] (]) 05:29, 17 February 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block1 --> ] (]) 05:29, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {{tlx|unblock|How you say "This should be discussed in ]" and after that, you block my account for an edit warring. I stated that I stopped reverting when the problem was reported and I haven't made any revert in that article. I've been in Misplaced Pages for over a year and have more that 3000 edits, I have never vandalised an article and when I'm in a content dispute I get blocked. I request the block to be lifted, since I have stopped with it and I won't continue until it's resolved. Thanks for understanding. <b><font color="#002BB8">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#002BB8">]</font></sup> 05:57, 17 February 2008 (UTC)}} | |||
| {| width="75%" align="center" class="notice noprint" style="background: none; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em auto;" | |||
| |- | |||
| | valign="top" style="padding: 0.1em" | ] | |||
| | style="padding: 0.1em" | | |||
| '''Your request to be unblocked''' has been '''granted''' for the following reason(s): | |||
| <br><br>OK, you should know better than this but I'm willing to take you at your word. | |||
| ''Request handled by:'' ] (]) 06:08, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Request accepted (after-block request) --> | |||
| |} ] (]) 06:08, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I should know better? What's that shit supposed to mean? I haven't broke any rule at all and I stopped reverting when it was reported and I still get blocked. You say that issue should be taken to 3RR, yet you block me for a content dispute. Content disputes are not vandalism. | |||
| :I request you give me the true reason of the blocking, if you're not bussy blocking another users, of course. <b><font color="#002BB8">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#002BB8">]</font></sup> 06:16, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Please note that I blocked you for ], which was causing damage to the encyclopedia. You have agreed to stop edit warring and given your record of contribution I believe you and have unblocked. If you took offense at my unblocking statement, I apologize. It was not meant with malice. ] (]) 06:55, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Oh, of course. You block someone and you expect them to give you a cookie. What's wrong with you? "You should know better"... like I'm a 10 year old kid... | |||
| :::And if you see what type of contributions are mine ''after'' blocking me, why didn't you do so before the block? Now thanks to your ignorance I have a block log in my account. I hope you're happy. <b><font color="#002BB8">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#002BB8">]</font></sup> 07:11, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Most folks get blocked at one time or another - my block certainly didn't prevent me from becoming an admin. You were clearly edit warring as was called out on the AN/I page. Your contribution history merely persuaded me that your promise to refrain from doing so was credible. Should I regret doing so? ] (]) 07:25, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Don't ask me, you're a grown man who, I believe, can make their own decisions. <b><font color="#002BB8">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#002BB8">]</font></sup> 07:33, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::SMH at your self nomination, I probably should be an admin too. <b><font color="#002BB8">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#002BB8">]</font></sup> 07:35, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::Up to you. But I can tell you it's a long, sleepless week. I wouldn't recommend it for those who get easily rattled. ] (]) 13:27, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::What the hell are you doing on Misplaced Pages? You have sons to feed. <b><font color="#002BB8">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#002BB8">]</font></sup> 22:13, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Blocked== | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] {{#if:72 hours|You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''72 hours'''|You have been temporarily ''']''' from editing}} in accordance with ] for {{#if:harassment & personal attacks|'''harassment & personal attacks'''|]}}. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:|] (]) 23:49, 17 February 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- {{unblock reviewed|1=I haven't harassed nobody. He came here talking trash. I request this block to be lifted, the user started the situation, I just was replying to it. Thanks for understanding.|decline=A string of abuse, including at the admin who unblocked you? You can sit this one out. — ~~~~}} | |||
| :Sorry, I fell for that line once already today. Perhaps another passing admin will be more favorable but I doubt it given your string of abuse today. To any reviewing admin, please note that the second block was for personal attacks directed at another user that have since been deleted from the page, not those directed at me. ] (]) 23:55, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Listen, I said I won't enter in the edit warring again. Now, have I? No. Now I'm saying I didn't start the situation, which is true and you block my account. | |||
| ::I haven't lie to you, so I'm not really sure what you mean about falling on that "line". I haven't abused nothing, that user is troll, just check his block log. If you lift this I'd appreciate. ~~~~ | |||
Revision as of 00:03, 18 February 2008
Watchlist cleared out.