| Revision as of 05:27, 24 February 2008 view sourceFran Rogers (talk | contribs)8,995 edits it's w00t← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:48, 24 February 2008 view source ClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,385,862 editsm Archiving 1 discussions to User talk:Party/Archives2008/February. (BOT)Next edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| {{Template:Rollback}} | {{Template:Rollback}} | ||
| <!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE --> | ||
| == Re:] == | |||
| I guess so. If you see a user with less than 500 edits that does not explain a reason for wanting AWB, I don't see a problem with removing them. '''] ]''' 03:52, 20 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==RE: Barnstar== | ==RE: Barnstar== | ||
Revision as of 08:48, 24 February 2008
 | This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely. Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |  |
 Archives | |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 4 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III. |
| This user is watching you trough the Internet Tubes! O_O |
RE: Barnstar
Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
AWB for user:wolfram1
see User_talk:Wolfram1#WP:AWB --Wolfram1 (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Re: WP:AWB
Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Re:AWB question
It can be used on any wiki. jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
- My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English[REDACTED] is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved. jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
You're welcome
It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Blocked
Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Party (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.
Decline reason:
No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Category: