Misplaced Pages

User talk:Party: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:28, 24 February 2008 view sourceParty (talk | contribs)2,423 edits Undid revision 193778417 by Jpgordon (talk)← Previous edit Revision as of 21:29, 24 February 2008 view source Ryan Postlethwaite (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users28,432 editsm Reverted edits by Party (talk) to last version by JpgordonNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{sockpuppet|EpicFlame|confirmed}}
{{retired}}

<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Archive box|image=]
|{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
|archiveprefix=User talk:Party/Archives
|format=Y/F
|age=100
|index=yes
}}
}}
<!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -->

==RE: Barnstar==
Say, thanks! It has been added to my ]. :) ]''']''' 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
:Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! ] (]) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
::Thank you for the barnstar Party. <font color="blue">'' ''']'''<sup>(])</sup><sub>(])</sub> ''</font> 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
:::Par-tey! thank you. --] (]) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
:Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. ] (]) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

== AWB for user:wolfram1 ==

see ] --] (]) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

== Re: WP:AWB ==

Thanks for looking over my application. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;background-color: white;color: blue;">] (]•])</span></small> 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

== Re:AWB question ==

It can be used on any wiki. &nbsp; '''] ]''' 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
:My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits ''here'' he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on ]. The English[REDACTED] is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved. &nbsp; '''] ]''' 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

==You're welcome==

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, ] (]) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - ] (]) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

] per above--] <sup> ] </sup> 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

== Blocked ==

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a ] of {{Userlinks|EpicFlame}}. ] 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed|1=Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.|decline=No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email . ]}}

== Notes from Deskana ==

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

# He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", ''rarely'' being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
# When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
# When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

] <small>]</small> 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:29, 24 February 2008

Multi-user iconThis account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.
Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth		A CheckUser has confirmed that this account is a sockpuppet

Archives
Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 4 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III.

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

AWB for user:wolfram1

see User_talk:Wolfram1#WP:AWB --Wolfram1 (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English[REDACTED] is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Party (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. My ISP has a extremely wide IP range that covers a lot of Class A and Class B IP's.

Decline reason:

No admin can overturn this block. Your only course would be to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. east.718 at 05:21, February 24, 2008

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes from Deskana

The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;

  1. He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
  2. When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
  3. When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.

Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Deskana (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Category:
User talk:Party: Difference between revisions Add topic