| Revision as of 05:02, 26 February 2008 view sourceCvyvvZkmSUDowVf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers25,542 edits →warning: someone has a learning problem← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:25, 26 February 2008 view source Dorftrottel (talk | contribs)14,762 edits Caution: Personal attack directed at a specific editor. using TWNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| :My ; you missed the whole point. ] (]) 10:59, 22 February 2008 (UTC) | :My ; you missed the whole point. ] (]) 10:59, 22 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == February 2008 == | |||
| ] {{#if:|With regard to your comments on ]: }}Please see Misplaced Pages's ] policy. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to ] for disruption. Please ] and keep this in mind while editing. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-npa2 --> '''D'''or'''ft'''ro'<!-- -->''tt'''el (]) 05:25, ], 200<!--DT-->8 05:25, 26 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:25, 26 February 2008
 Archives | |
|
|
Archive box
Please note that some articles have additional information in their "manual" archive boxes, such as date ranges, issues addressed within the archive and so on. I have reverted your change in the archive style at Talk:Albert Einstein (I hope you don't mind). Anyway, I trust you will use sound judgement on whether an automatic archive box works for a particular talk page or not. Cheers, Silly rabbit (talk) 04:28, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- I updated Talk:Albert Einstein to use the "archive banner" template again. I think you'll like the improvements I made. Thanks for your suggestion. Timneu22 (talk) 14:35, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! Silly rabbit (talk) 14:51, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Rickey Henderson
I completely agree with your comment to this. Please see my comment, and then based off of that - shall we ask for a reassessment? - Milk's Favorite Cookie 18:59, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- I added more notes to it. I think they should just add the {{fact}} tags and then we'd have a starting point. Otherwise, it is just vague -- you need more references, but I won't tell you where. How is that helpful? ;-) Timneu22 (talk) 11:29, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Copyvio
Regarding your assertion that copyvio tags aren't necessary... copyright infringement is a very serious issue and must be dealt with swiftly and properly. I'm sure you didn't insert copyrighted material in the article, however I find it worrisome that you object to copyvio tags being placed on articles that clearly are in violation of legal copyrights. Please review our policies regarding copyrights. Thanks. /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 20:17, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- My reply; you missed the whole point. Timneu22 (talk) 10:59, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
February 2008
Please see Misplaced Pages's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Dorftrottel (warn) 05:25, February 26, 2008 05:25, 26 February 2008 (UTC)