User talk:Colleenthegreat: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 21:57, 26 February 2008 editColleenthegreat (talk \| contribs)244 edits →You are blocked: sorry← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:19, 27 February 2008 edit undoMangojuice (talk \| contribs)19,969 edits →You are blocked Next edit →
Line 72:		Line 72:

	{{unblock\|1=It should be noted that English is not my first language, so in the edit where I changed "heroine" to "heroin," I thought I was reverting vandalism and correcting the spelling, which I know was wrong and that I should be more careful if I'm not completely sure about a word. I have some history of helping anti-vandal efforts, and this is the only edit I've made that I would think to be vandalism. My other recent edits have been reverted by the blocking admin (]), although I'm not sure why all of these can be considered vandalism. Slrubenstein had misunderstood my intentions when I posted a proposal on ], and the block occured ''after'' I ] where I could best accomplish my request, which should have shown that I was not necessarily intending to troll, as Slrubenstein originally accused. I am a little bit familiar of the process of issuing user warnings, and I feel I was not sufficiently warned that my actions were nearing the point of being blocked. Not to mention being blocked for a month. I feel that is a little bit extreme. I can source at least some of my recent edits that Slrubenstein reverted, and I think I should be given a second chance, and, if possible, sufficiently warned of an impending block in the future. Additionally, I feel I should also apologize after reading some of Slrubenstien's comments with ]. If it means anything, I am sorry, and I realize a lot of people seem to be misinterpreting me. I am learning english better every day, and I will always try to improve my contributions.}}		{{unblock\|1=It should be noted that English is not my first language, so in the edit where I changed "heroine" to "heroin," I thought I was reverting vandalism and correcting the spelling, which I know was wrong and that I should be more careful if I'm not completely sure about a word. I have some history of helping anti-vandal efforts, and this is the only edit I've made that I would think to be vandalism. My other recent edits have been reverted by the blocking admin (]), although I'm not sure why all of these can be considered vandalism. Slrubenstein had misunderstood my intentions when I posted a proposal on ], and the block occured ''after'' I ] where I could best accomplish my request, which should have shown that I was not necessarily intending to troll, as Slrubenstein originally accused. I am a little bit familiar of the process of issuing user warnings, and I feel I was not sufficiently warned that my actions were nearing the point of being blocked. Not to mention being blocked for a month. I feel that is a little bit extreme. I can source at least some of my recent edits that Slrubenstein reverted, and I think I should be given a second chance, and, if possible, sufficiently warned of an impending block in the future. Additionally, I feel I should also apologize after reading some of Slrubenstien's comments with ]. If it means anything, I am sorry, and I realize a lot of people seem to be misinterpreting me. I am learning english better every day, and I will always try to improve my contributions.}}

			:This block may be a bit much. However, your behavior on ] has been inappropriate, and is really the root cause of the block. Obviously Misplaced Pages is not going to accept things in the Bible as ''fact''. Many people have tried to explain this point to you but you seem to be unwilling to listen or unable to understand. This is what you need to address before any unblock could be considered. ]]<sup>]</sup> 05:19, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:19, 27 February 2008

Because it is ridiculous.pointlessforest 01:59, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

What do I do?

I dont know what to do because someone keep vandalising on me because he is removing my contribute. What do I do? Please help me Colleenthegreat 02:10, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Maybe try Misplaced Pages:Wikiquette alerts? Ewlyahoocom 02:23, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

You may also find some helpful information in the following links:

Welcome!

Hello, Colleenthegreat, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Ewlyahoocom 02:27, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

First, while you were editing the page, you were placing original research into the article. Second, while your edits were good, I don't appreciate you placing information which is proven to be false into an article that I am currently working on. Please read the above message in order to see how Misplaced Pages works. Miranda 02:34, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Know me?

I highly doubt you know me. What even brought you too me in the first place?? Darkage7 06:45, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Cześć!

cześć, przepraszam za to, że się na Ciebie wczoraj zezłościłam. Mam nadzieję, że dobrze Ci idzie na Wikipedii. Miranda 07:27, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

"Featured article" tags

Please stop adding these to articles that haven't been officially designated "featured." If you'd like more information about featured articles, please read over this page Joyous! | Talk 23:57, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Nonsense edits

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Cedar Run is NOT the largest waterway in Lycoming County, Pennsylvania (the West Branch Susquehanna River is, and Pine Creek is the largest creek). Please stop or risk being blocked, Ruhrfisch _><>° 04:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did to Cedar Run, Pennsylvania. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Making an article on Cedar Run is fine, but claiming it has 1,493 inhabitants is just nonsense. The village is in Brown Township which has a total only 111 people as of 2000. Ruhrfisch _><>° 04:56, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem and hope I did not come across as too gruff above. Here is the USGS GNIS lisiting of populated places in US with the name "Cedar Run" (even as an alternate name) Ruhrfisch _><>° 05:58, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008

Thank you for making a report on Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Misplaced Pages and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you! —slakr 06:14, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

this one. Cheers =) --slakr 06:16, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Greetings from a Kosovar!

Thanks for the message. If you mean my little addition to the Flag of Kosovo is unconstructive but lauded, then I should let you know that these are things you hear a lot, but you don't seem them on the news. I think some articles need to include something that has become popular, even such a useless anecdote.--Getoar (talk) 06:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Reply to Your Smile

Hi, thank you for smiling at me! Could you tell me what in particular it was I did that made you smile? Wow, I feel so special! How kind of you! — Cuyler91093 - Соитяівцтіоиѕ 06:40, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, to be honest, I don't know. I just see that you are a constructive editor to Misplaced Pages! :D You see, I've been doing vandal warnings tonight and I decided to turn it around and applaud real contributers. So I'm going through the recent changes looking for good edits and thanking them with a changed vandal warning template instead of warning vandals with one :) It was getting depressing. So thanks! Colleenthegreat (talk) 06:43, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, wow, well I'm honored to be smiled at! I smile at you for making the community a better place. ;) — Cuyler91093 - Соитяівцтіоиѕ 06:44, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Is that why you smiled at me, too? If so, thank you!Johnmc (talk) 06:46, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh ok. Thanks for the smile and sorry for misinterpreting. Keep up the good work. Okiefromokla 06:54, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Use of Uw-vandalism4im Template

Please be more judicious when handing out Uw-vandalism4im warnings which should only be issued for the most egregious acts of vandalism. Most admins will not block users if a report is made to AIV and they see this warning issued for "run of the mill" vandalism. For example, I have no idea why this was issued. --NeilN 06:52, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

This and this as well. --NeilN 07:03, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Nonsense edits

You have been warned before not to make nonsense edits. You continue to do so on the Talk:Jesus page, which is dedicated to discussion for improving the encyclopedia article - not silly attempts to proselytize others. Please stop. Slrubenstein | Talk 11:41, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Duut, Khovd

"...and is very sparsely populated dispite having several large but obscure communities". Your added this post with no references and it looks original research. W Wiki nie wskazane dodawanie opinii własnych. Pozdrawiam. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 13:26, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

You are blocked

You have been warned repeatedly about nonsense edits. This is vandalism. I am blocking you for one month. Let's see if that is enough time for you to grow up. Slrubenstein | Talk 13:43, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Colleenthegreat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It should be noted that English is not my first language, so in the edit where I changed "heroine" to "heroin," I thought I was reverting vandalism and correcting the spelling, which I know was wrong and that I should be more careful if I'm not completely sure about a word. I have some history of helping anti-vandal efforts, and this is the only edit I've made that I would think to be vandalism. My other recent edits have been reverted by the blocking admin (User:Slrubenstein), although I'm not sure why all of these can be considered vandalism. Slrubenstein had misunderstood my intentions when I posted a proposal on Talk:Jesus, and the block occured after I asked where I could best accomplish my request, which should have shown that I was not necessarily intending to troll, as Slrubenstein originally accused. I am a little bit familiar of the process of issuing user warnings, and I feel I was not sufficiently warned that my actions were nearing the point of being blocked. Not to mention being blocked for a month. I feel that is a little bit extreme. I can source at least some of my recent edits that Slrubenstein reverted, and I think I should be given a second chance, and, if possible, sufficiently warned of an impending block in the future. Additionally, I feel I should also apologize after reading some of Slrubenstien's comments with Chensiyuan. If it means anything, I am sorry, and I realize a lot of people seem to be misinterpreting me. I am learning english better every day, and I will always try to improve my contributions.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=It should be noted that English is not my first language, so in the edit where I changed "heroine" to "heroin," I thought I was reverting vandalism and correcting the spelling, which I know was wrong and that I should be more careful if I'm not completely sure about a word. I have some history of helping anti-vandal efforts, and this is the only edit I've made that I would think to be vandalism. My other recent edits have been reverted by the blocking admin (]), although I'm not sure why all of these can be considered vandalism. Slrubenstein had misunderstood my intentions when I posted a proposal on ], and the block occured ''after'' I ] where I could best accomplish my request, which should have shown that I was not necessarily intending to troll, as Slrubenstein originally accused. I am a little bit familiar of the process of issuing user warnings, and I feel I was not sufficiently warned that my actions were nearing the point of being blocked. Not to mention being blocked for a month. I feel that is a little bit extreme. I can source at least some of my recent edits that Slrubenstein reverted, and I think I should be given a second chance, and, if possible, sufficiently warned of an impending block in the future. Additionally, I feel I should also apologize after reading some of Slrubenstien's comments with ]. If it means anything, I am sorry, and I realize a lot of people seem to be misinterpreting me. I am learning english better every day, and I will always try to improve my contributions. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=It should be noted that English is not my first language, so in the edit where I changed "heroine" to "heroin," I thought I was reverting vandalism and correcting the spelling, which I know was wrong and that I should be more careful if I'm not completely sure about a word. I have some history of helping anti-vandal efforts, and this is the only edit I've made that I would think to be vandalism. My other recent edits have been reverted by the blocking admin (]), although I'm not sure why all of these can be considered vandalism. Slrubenstein had misunderstood my intentions when I posted a proposal on ], and the block occured ''after'' I ] where I could best accomplish my request, which should have shown that I was not necessarily intending to troll, as Slrubenstein originally accused. I am a little bit familiar of the process of issuing user warnings, and I feel I was not sufficiently warned that my actions were nearing the point of being blocked. Not to mention being blocked for a month. I feel that is a little bit extreme. I can source at least some of my recent edits that Slrubenstein reverted, and I think I should be given a second chance, and, if possible, sufficiently warned of an impending block in the future. Additionally, I feel I should also apologize after reading some of Slrubenstien's comments with ]. If it means anything, I am sorry, and I realize a lot of people seem to be misinterpreting me. I am learning english better every day, and I will always try to improve my contributions. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=It should be noted that English is not my first language, so in the edit where I changed "heroine" to "heroin," I thought I was reverting vandalism and correcting the spelling, which I know was wrong and that I should be more careful if I'm not completely sure about a word. I have some history of helping anti-vandal efforts, and this is the only edit I've made that I would think to be vandalism. My other recent edits have been reverted by the blocking admin (]), although I'm not sure why all of these can be considered vandalism. Slrubenstein had misunderstood my intentions when I posted a proposal on ], and the block occured ''after'' I ] where I could best accomplish my request, which should have shown that I was not necessarily intending to troll, as Slrubenstein originally accused. I am a little bit familiar of the process of issuing user warnings, and I feel I was not sufficiently warned that my actions were nearing the point of being blocked. Not to mention being blocked for a month. I feel that is a little bit extreme. I can source at least some of my recent edits that Slrubenstein reverted, and I think I should be given a second chance, and, if possible, sufficiently warned of an impending block in the future. Additionally, I feel I should also apologize after reading some of Slrubenstien's comments with ]. If it means anything, I am sorry, and I realize a lot of people seem to be misinterpreting me. I am learning english better every day, and I will always try to improve my contributions. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This block may be a bit much. However, your behavior on Talk:Jesus has been inappropriate, and is really the root cause of the block. Obviously Misplaced Pages is not going to accept things in the Bible as fact. Many people have tried to explain this point to you but you seem to be unwilling to listen or unable to understand. This is what you need to address before any unblock could be considered. Mango juice 05:19, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Category:

Requests for unblock

Revision as of 21:57, 26 February 2008 editColleenthegreat (talk \| contribs)244 edits →You are blocked: sorry← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:19, 27 February 2008 edit undoMangojuice (talk \| contribs)19,969 edits →You are blocked Next edit →
Line 72:		Line 72:

	{{unblock\|1=It should be noted that English is not my first language, so in the edit where I changed "heroine" to "heroin," I thought I was reverting vandalism and correcting the spelling, which I know was wrong and that I should be more careful if I'm not completely sure about a word. I have some history of helping anti-vandal efforts, and this is the only edit I've made that I would think to be vandalism. My other recent edits have been reverted by the blocking admin (]), although I'm not sure why all of these can be considered vandalism. Slrubenstein had misunderstood my intentions when I posted a proposal on ], and the block occured ''after'' I ] where I could best accomplish my request, which should have shown that I was not necessarily intending to troll, as Slrubenstein originally accused. I am a little bit familiar of the process of issuing user warnings, and I feel I was not sufficiently warned that my actions were nearing the point of being blocked. Not to mention being blocked for a month. I feel that is a little bit extreme. I can source at least some of my recent edits that Slrubenstein reverted, and I think I should be given a second chance, and, if possible, sufficiently warned of an impending block in the future. Additionally, I feel I should also apologize after reading some of Slrubenstien's comments with ]. If it means anything, I am sorry, and I realize a lot of people seem to be misinterpreting me. I am learning english better every day, and I will always try to improve my contributions.}}		{{unblock\|1=It should be noted that English is not my first language, so in the edit where I changed "heroine" to "heroin," I thought I was reverting vandalism and correcting the spelling, which I know was wrong and that I should be more careful if I'm not completely sure about a word. I have some history of helping anti-vandal efforts, and this is the only edit I've made that I would think to be vandalism. My other recent edits have been reverted by the blocking admin (]), although I'm not sure why all of these can be considered vandalism. Slrubenstein had misunderstood my intentions when I posted a proposal on ], and the block occured ''after'' I ] where I could best accomplish my request, which should have shown that I was not necessarily intending to troll, as Slrubenstein originally accused. I am a little bit familiar of the process of issuing user warnings, and I feel I was not sufficiently warned that my actions were nearing the point of being blocked. Not to mention being blocked for a month. I feel that is a little bit extreme. I can source at least some of my recent edits that Slrubenstein reverted, and I think I should be given a second chance, and, if possible, sufficiently warned of an impending block in the future. Additionally, I feel I should also apologize after reading some of Slrubenstien's comments with ]. If it means anything, I am sorry, and I realize a lot of people seem to be misinterpreting me. I am learning english better every day, and I will always try to improve my contributions.}}

			:This block may be a bit much. However, your behavior on ] has been inappropriate, and is really the root cause of the block. Obviously Misplaced Pages is not going to accept things in the Bible as ''fact''. Many people have tried to explain this point to you but you seem to be unwilling to listen or unable to understand. This is what you need to address before any unblock could be considered. ]]<sup>]</sup> 05:19, 27 February 2008 (UTC)