Revision as of 01:07, 11 March 2008 view sourceAhoalton (talk | contribs)27 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:03, 11 March 2008 view source Jayron32 (talk | contribs)105,509 edits Sockpuppets don't get unblocked... GoodbyeNext edit → | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
{{unblock|This username Ahoalton is completely acceptable. It is a Lenni Lanape word which translates to "to love one another"! How can any organization have the right to exclusive use of a word, let alone a word expressing a benevolent sentiment like this?! I request the immediate unblocking of my username and account. If you follow the order of events on the talk page you will find that I have conducted myself civilly and have made every attempt to conform to the administrator's demands, even when those demands were unwarranted. You will also see a systematic attempt to quash the issues that I am trying to constructively debate.}} | {{unblock reviewed|This username Ahoalton is completely acceptable. It is a Lenni Lanape word which translates to "to love one another"! How can any organization have the right to exclusive use of a word, let alone a word expressing a benevolent sentiment like this?! I request the immediate unblocking of my username and account. If you follow the order of events on the talk page you will find that I have conducted myself civilly and have made every attempt to conform to the administrator's demands, even when those demands were unwarranted. You will also see a systematic attempt to quash the issues that I am trying to constructively debate.|decline = you are clearly blocked user: {{user|69.127.11.135}}. You may not create new accounts to dodge a block. Regardless of the meaning of your username, this account will NOT be unblocked because you are violating Misplaced Pages policy by continuing to change accounts and IP addresses to avoid prior blocks.--].].] 02:03, 11 March 2008 (UTC)}} | ||
:Hi Ahoalton, I've asked Dreadstar to explain why he considers the name to be unacceptable. ] (]) 00:11, 11 March 2008 (UTC) | :Hi Ahoalton, I've asked Dreadstar to explain why he considers the name to be unacceptable. ] (]) 00:11, 11 March 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:03, 11 March 2008
This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Misplaced Pages, because of concerns that the chosen username may not meet our username policy.- This is often not a reflection on the user, and you are encouraged to choose a new account name which does meet our guidelines and are invited to contribute to Misplaced Pages under an appropriate username. If you feel this block was made in error, you may quickly and easily appeal it - see below.
Our username policy provides guidance on selecting your username. In brief, usernames should not be offensive, disruptive, promotional, related to a 'real-world' group or organization, confusing, or misleading.
If you have already made edits and wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name you may request a change in username which is quick and easy. To do so, please follow these directions:
- Add {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. This is possible because even when you are blocked, you can still edit your own talk page.
- At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
- Please note, you may only request a name that is not already in use. The account is created upon acceptance – do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change since we can far easier allocate your new name to you, if it is not yet used. For more information, please visit Misplaced Pages:Changing username.
Last, the automated software systems that prevent vandalism may have been activated, which can cause new account creation to be blocked also. If you have not acted in a deliberately inappropriate manner, please let us know if this happens, and we will deactivate the block as soon as possible. You may also appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below or emailing the administrator who blocked you.
Dreadstar † 23:32, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Ahoalton (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This username Ahoalton is completely acceptable. It is a Lenni Lanape word which translates to "to love one another"! How can any organization have the right to exclusive use of a word, let alone a word expressing a benevolent sentiment like this?! I request the immediate unblocking of my username and account. If you follow the order of events on the talk page you will find that I have conducted myself civilly and have made every attempt to conform to the administrator's demands, even when those demands were unwarranted. You will also see a systematic attempt to quash the issues that I am trying to constructively debate.
Decline reason:
you are clearly blocked user: 69.127.11.135 (talk · contribs). You may not create new accounts to dodge a block. Regardless of the meaning of your username, this account will NOT be unblocked because you are violating Misplaced Pages policy by continuing to change accounts and IP addresses to avoid prior blocks.--Jayron32.talk.contribs 02:03, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Hi Ahoalton, I've asked Dreadstar to explain why he considers the name to be unacceptable. Addhoc (talk) 00:11, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- To the reviewing admin, this user has been disruptively editing from several IP addresses which were blocked. This username "Ahoalton" is one of the words he has been trying to edit war into an article against consensus, , , , . Dreadstar † 00:12, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- To the reviewing admin: please don't take the disruption at face value. Look very closely at what has been said and you will see that the administrators opposed to the ideas I am bringing to the talk page have a WP:CONFLICT as regards the topic of the Order of the Arrow. This has been agreed upon by at least two neutral administrators. I admit that I was IP-hopping early on and I regret that, but have since done all that was asked of me to bring the discussion to a civil and even tone. Yes, I picked a controversial name, but it is neither vulgar nor a trademark. To block it is to quash my free speech on Misplaced Pages.--Ahoalton (talk) 00:23, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- So you admit to choosing a controversial name? That's disruption, please pick another user name that isn't controversial. Dreadstar † 00:25, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- To the reviewing admin: please don't take the disruption at face value. Look very closely at what has been said and you will see that the administrators opposed to the ideas I am bringing to the talk page have a WP:CONFLICT as regards the topic of the Order of the Arrow. This has been agreed upon by at least two neutral administrators. I admit that I was IP-hopping early on and I regret that, but have since done all that was asked of me to bring the discussion to a civil and even tone. Yes, I picked a controversial name, but it is neither vulgar nor a trademark. To block it is to quash my free speech on Misplaced Pages.--Ahoalton (talk) 00:23, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- Insofar as picking a name that means "love one another" is controversial, yes, I have picked a controversial name. I suppose, historically, that has been a fairly controversial sentiment. I hear people have even been killed for expressing it. Is that the message you are trying to send? Does everyone on Misplaced Pages have to vet their name with the admins and editors working on the OA entry?--Ahoalton (talk) 00:32, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- Also please note the history of Order of the Arrow, last night Ahoalton was IP hopping and edit warring as
- 69.127.1.53
- 69.127.11.176
- 69.127.11.135
- two of the IP accounts were blocked for that for 24h, which has probably expired by now. The Ahoalton account was created and editing during that time, which is also block evasion.Dreadstar † 00:51, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- Also please note the history of Order of the Arrow, last night Ahoalton was IP hopping and edit warring as
- And also note that I have expressed my regret for IP-hopping, that I created an account as I was asked to do by the admins who requested it and that I have since attempted to engage them in debate and discussion of the topic through the dispute resolution methods that a neutral admin directed me to. I am new to this and I have thrown myself into it but I have tried to conform to[REDACTED] conventions. I have to say that the way I have been treated seems alot like "biting the newcomers" --Ahoalton (talk) 01:00, 11 March 2008 (UTC)