Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 12:11, 15 March 2008

Roger Yates

Hey SV. Are you familiar with this chap? Not much going on, notability wise, academically, but there is a claim on the talk page that he may have some notability as a jailed activist in the past. Rockpocket 05:06, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

RP, I've e-mailed you, as it's not yet clear what the sources are saying or whether it's the same person. SlimVirgin 06:13, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

ALF

Please do not revert without stated reason. The fact that the ALF is a designated terrorist group deserves more paramount treatment than, say, the actions of this group. Please try to be objective. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oregondesert (talk • contribs) 07:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Too bad

Zeq (talk) 21:16, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

BLP discussion

Hi Slim. You might be interested in this discussion. Lawrence § t/e 23:26, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

My RfA

Thanks for your support. - J Greb (talk) 22:58, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Jimbo wales' talk page

Please take a look at the message left regarding your actions, cheers. Joshuarooney2008 (talk) 07:44, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Feedback on draft requested - User:Lawrence Cohen/Arbitration RFC draft

Hi, if you have a moment, would you mind reviewing User:Lawrence Cohen/Arbitration RFC draft? I'm just beginning to draft this, but given the recent situations I think this could be valuable to see what community mandates if any exist for changes the Arbitration Committee could be required to accept. My intention was to keep the RFC format exceptionally simple, with a very limited number of "top level" sections that were fairly precise. Please leave any feedback on User talk:Lawrence Cohen/Arbitration RFC draft. Thanks. Lawrence § t/e 17:22, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

fyi

--Zeq (talk) 16:51, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Advice sought

Please read User_talk:Nandesuka#Merge-and-delete_violates_the_GFDL.

This sounds ridiculous to me. But I'm willing to believe that once again best practices have passed me by. Is he correct? Nandesuka (talk) 18:59, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

The plot thickens: . Not only is he making that claim, but he's using his admin tools to restore "his" article history. I've asked Danny for clarification. Nandesuka (talk) 23:26, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

I've taken this up at Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard#A case of merge and delete and the GFDL. Note that in the past I've done restoration of other merge-and-deleted material similar to this, I'm not doing this solely because I happen to be the one who wrote the material. My attention happened to be on it since I got a notice on my talk page. Bryan Derksen (talk) 23:32, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:PETAlogo2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:PETAlogo2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:11, 15 March 2008 (UTC)