Revision as of 20:41, 19 April 2008 editNick Levinson (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,605 edits Part-restored re book; combined refs that were same; respelled ''canvass''. See Talk.← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:51, 19 April 2008 edit undoNick Levinson (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,605 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
==Book: Activism, Inc.== | ==Book: Activism, Inc.== | ||
The book "Activism, Inc.: How the Outsourcing of Grassroots Campaigns Is Strangling Progressive Politics in America" by Columbia University sociologist Dana Fisher, is based on her study of a sample of Fund canvass offices during the summer of 2003. The Fund is the core of the study, and clearly identified even while masked in the book as the People's Project<ref name=ActivBkFFPIRNamed>Fisher, Dana, ''Activism, Inc. |
The book "Activism, Inc.: How the Outsourcing of Grassroots Campaigns Is Strangling Progressive Politics in America" by Columbia University sociologist Dana Fisher, is based on her study of a sample of Fund canvass offices during the summer of 2003. The Fund is the core of the study, and clearly identified even while masked in the book as the People's Project<ref name=ActivBkFFPIRNamed>Fisher, Dana, ''Activism, Inc.'' (above), p. 39 & nn. 7-8 & URL in n. 7; & see ''id.'', p. xii & n. 2.</ref>. The Fund has created a website to respond to a few of the criticisms raised by the book<ref name=CanvassingWorksorg>http://www.CanvassingWorks.org/</ref>. | ||
== References == | == References == |
Revision as of 20:51, 19 April 2008
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
No issues specified. Please specify issues, or remove this template. (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
The Fund for Public Interest Research (generally referred to as the FFPIR or "the Fund") is a 501(c)(4) non-profit organization that runs the public fundraising and membership operations canvassing for several political nonprofit organizations. The FFPIR name reflects its origins as the fundraising arm of the Public Interest Research Groups (PIRGs). Since the early 1990s, the Fund has also canvassed for other groups, working very closely with the Sierra Club, among others, but retains a special relationship with the PIRGs and other groups under the PIRG umbrella; many PIRG employees direct Fund offices during the summer, many Fund offices share space with PIRG offices, and significant organizational infrastructure is shared between the Fund and the PIRGs.
History
The Fund was created in the 1980s to raise money and build membership for the State PIRGs. The Fund is now one of the largest grassroots political fundraising networks in the country, running more than 70 field offices for groups like the The State PIRGs, the Sierra Club and the Human Rights Campaign.
FFPIR grew out of a MASSPIRG initiative campaign to pass the Bottle Bill where they first utilized door-to-door canvassing. The development of a membership and funding infrastructure independent of the campus chapters that had been until that time the center of the PIRG infrastructure reversed the decline in resources and influence that the PIRGs had been experiencing at that time, and initiated a shift in the PIRGs' organizational model that saw the previously campus-bound groups convert themselves into a mass-membership lobbying organization.
Today, most state PIRGs utilize the Fund to execute their door-to-door, street fundraising and telephone fundraising and membership drives. The PIRGs claim they have more than 400,000 active members. The Fund's partner groups have grown significantly as well; for instance, more than half of the Sierra Club's current membership of 750,000 was recruited by the Fund. FFPIR hires paid canvass directors to lead canvass offices in selected locations around the country. The locations are negotiated between FFPIR and its partner groups. In turn, these directors hire canvassers to raise money for the Fund's partners. Fund canvassers can receive a base weekly wage as well as 35% of all the money they raise over the weekly quota. The weekly fundraising quota averages between $90.00 and $120.00 per day depending on location. Until very recently, if the canvasser was unable to obtain the weekly quota, he or she was paid a fraction of the money they fundraised in lieu of the weekly wage. This often resulted in below minimum wage pay for the employee. The Fund has recently begun paying canvassers a guaranteed minimum wage and paid training day in response to a large class action lawsuit brought by current and former employees. FFPIR balloons in size (both in terms of the number of field offices and the number of canvassers per field office) during the summer months. The growth is largely due to hiring large numbers of college students for summer canvassing jobs.
Labor disputes
The Fund has been criticized for its policies towards staff. The Fund acknowledges that canvassing directors often work more than 60 hours a week, and portrays a "typical day" as running from 9:30 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. As of 2006, directors were paid a starting salary of $23,750 plus commission. In a class action lawsuit, former canvassers alleged that they were paid below minimum wage and required to work overtime without compensation. FFPIR does not dispute the factual allegations, instead arguing that minimum wage and overtime laws do not apply to canvassers.
Two canvass directors who were terminated at the Fund's Los Angeles office alleged that the office was closed due to their unionizing efforts. The two directors say they had advocated the union because they were having trouble getting reimbursement for supplies and they had not received promised health care coverage.
Book: Activism, Inc.
The book "Activism, Inc.: How the Outsourcing of Grassroots Campaigns Is Strangling Progressive Politics in America" by Columbia University sociologist Dana Fisher, is based on her study of a sample of Fund canvass offices during the summer of 2003. The Fund is the core of the study, and clearly identified even while masked in the book as the People's Project. The Fund has created a website to respond to a few of the criticisms raised by the book.
References
- Fisher, Dana, Activism, Inc.: How the Outsourcing of Grassroots Campaigns Is Strangling Progressive Politics in America (Stanford Univ. Press, 2006).
- ^ Overtime Class Action Suit Against the Fund for Public Interest Research
- Ehrenreich, Ben. "Busting Unions: Progressives can do it, too". LA Weekly. February 8 - 14, 2002.
- Fisher, Dana, Activism, Inc. (above), p. 39 & nn. 7-8 & URL in n. 7; & see id., p. xii & n. 2.
- http://www.CanvassingWorks.org/
External links
- Fund for Public Interest Research (official website)