User talk:Indubitably: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 20:17, 15 May 2008 editIndubitably (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers39,667 edits →Tee hee: Expand← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:20, 15 May 2008 edit undoNeapolitan Sixth (talk \| contribs)82 edits →monobook.js: replyNext edit →
Line 38:		Line 38:
	I've noticed your mention of a javascript for softblocking or self-blocking using monobook.js. Can you tell me how this works and how to use it? I've tried testing it on my monobook.js and it doesn't seem to work, but I think I'm doing it wrong. Can you help? ] (]) 15:16, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		I've noticed your mention of a javascript for softblocking or self-blocking using monobook.js. Can you tell me how this works and how to use it? I've tried testing it on my monobook.js and it doesn't seem to work, but I think I'm doing it wrong. Can you help? ] (]) 15:16, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
	:I was given the code and I placed it in someone else's monobook. I don't know if the code worked or not. I've been told that it sometimes doesn't. In this case, however, it's not been tested by the person I placed it upon. He's simply not even attempting to log in right now. My understanding is it simply hides the log in function, so you're rendered incapable of logging in. I may test it on myself, just to see if it works. ''']''']''']''' 15:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)		:I was given the code and I placed it in someone else's monobook. I don't know if the code worked or not. I've been told that it sometimes doesn't. In this case, however, it's not been tested by the person I placed it upon. He's simply not even attempting to log in right now. My understanding is it simply hides the log in function, so you're rendered incapable of logging in. I may test it on myself, just to see if it works. ''']''']''']''' 15:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
			::OIC. You have to log out for it to work. I'd have to set a longer time for that to work and I didn't want to block myself for that long. Still doesn't seem to be that effective because you could just edit anonymously or just refresh and the login link is back. Thanks for replying! ] (]) 20:20, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

	== Tee hee ==		== Tee hee ==

Revision as of 20:20, 15 May 2008

User:LaraLove/title

_{This page looks best in Mozilla Firefox.}

	Women who seek to be equal with men lack ambition.
- Timothy Leary

					Subpages
User	Awards	BRC	Notebook	Contribs	Subpages	E-mail

LaraLove (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)

*READ THIS FIRST OR YOUR MESSAGE MAY BE IGNORED*

If you leave a message here, I'll reply here. If I've left you a message, you can reply there or here. If you chose to reply here, I will respond here.
If there is a conversation taking place somewhere, keep it there. It doesn't need to also take place on my talk page. Such discussions will be removed.
If you are pissed off at something I've done, assume good faith. Most likely, whatever I did was with the best of intentions. If you decide to pitch a fit on my talk page anyway, note that I endorse WP:DGAF.
As much as I like to smile, please do not post generic smile or wikilove templates here. If you want to personalize them, by all means, I appreciate those. Otherwise, give them to someone else.

Archives

2007:
2008:

monobook.js

I've noticed your mention of a javascript for softblocking or self-blocking using monobook.js. Can you tell me how this works and how to use it? I've tried testing it on my monobook.js and it doesn't seem to work, but I think I'm doing it wrong. Can you help? Neapolitan Sixth (talk) 15:16, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

I was given the code and I placed it in someone else's monobook. I don't know if the code worked or not. I've been told that it sometimes doesn't. In this case, however, it's not been tested by the person I placed it upon. He's simply not even attempting to log in right now. My understanding is it simply hides the log in function, so you're rendered incapable of logging in. I may test it on myself, just to see if it works. Lara❤Love 15:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

OIC. You have to log out for it to work. I'd have to set a longer time for that to work and I didn't want to block myself for that long. Still doesn't seem to be that effective because you could just edit anonymously or just refresh and the login link is back. Thanks for replying! Neapolitan Sixth (talk) 20:20, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Tee hee

That's another good editor I've fooled into thinking I'm an admin :D

Please, don't take this the wrong way, but I'd appreciate you removing me from your list of "community ban" participants. I just contributed to the RfC, is all. Hoping this produces a Δdrama < 0, SHEFFIELDSTEEL 20:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

I can correct it to state that you're just an editor, but the point is to list those you participated in the AN discussion. Removing you would be inappropriate. It's not to state you've done anything wrong. I'm simply detailing the limited participation that took place in the blocking of this user. Your actions are not in question. Lara❤Love 20:16, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Category:

Rouge admins