Misplaced Pages

Template:RFChist list: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:50, 15 June 2008 editRFC bot (talk | contribs)216,124 editsm Update, 14 current discussions← Previous edit Revision as of 07:51, 16 June 2008 edit undoRFC bot (talk | contribs)216,124 editsm Update, 14 current discussionsNext edit →
Line 11: Line 11:
* ] Is it appropriate to use a represntative quote by the book's author stated it's main thesis, as well as quotes from favorable book reviews, even if some editors find the POV of the book objectionable * ] Is it appropriate to use a represntative quote by the book's author stated it's main thesis, as well as quotes from favorable book reviews, even if some editors find the POV of the book objectionable
* ] Is the "Master Mahan — Master Mason Theory" Verifiable, keeping to Neutral Point of View, or not Original Research? Is it worthy of inclusion in the article? * ] Is the "Master Mahan — Master Mason Theory" Verifiable, keeping to Neutral Point of View, or not Original Research? Is it worthy of inclusion in the article?
* ] Deleting of WWII USHMM pictures


{{#ifeq:{{{hide_instructions}}}|yes| |{{RFC tagging instructions|RFChist}} }} {{#ifeq:{{{hide_instructions}}}|yes| |{{RFC tagging instructions|RFChist}} }}

Revision as of 07:51, 16 June 2008

The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:

  • Talk:Chippawa, Ontario A disagreement exists as to the correct local name for the river flowing through Chippawa - Chippawa "Creek", or "Crick"
  • Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard Is there enough support for alternative start dates to be considered the viewpoint of, at least, a significant minority?
  • Talk:National Liberation War of Macedonia There is a dispute about the neutrality of the article between Kobra85 and Revizionist, with admin Future Perfect at Sunrise and a few others sometimes involved in the discussion. There are basically two versions being argued for here. [http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title
  • Talk:Contras Need support of third party to request mediation unless you can think of a way to solve reversion and disputes
  • Talk:Knights Hospitaller Should order be described as "revived." Does it "claim" sovereignty or does it have sovereignty?
  • Talk:List of infantry divisions of the Soviet Union 1917–1957 This was a national troop type that can not be readily translated into English, with a variety of translations offered (see copious sources above). The naming in Misplaced Pages is based on the same principle as that used for Cossacks, Hussars and Landwehr
  • Talk:GADA 601 GADA 601 is an article about a South American military unit, the majority of the article covers a war with the British. Which form of English spelling should be used?
  • Talk:Belgrade Offensive there are several issues involved 1)that at the operation was not a combine/joint operation between the Red Army and the Yugoslav Army at the planing involving higher headquarters, but only involved front-line incidental cooperation at tactical level as required on those occasions when the troops from the two forces encountered each other; 2) That when this encounter occurred, the Yugoslav troops came under command of the Red Army (I need to provide a source for this, but English sources seem rare); 3) that the sources provided by User:DIRECTOR are valid, one being derived from a very general reference in the Library of Congress country dara entry, and others from a site the owner of which admitted they are not referenced (even if true)
  • Talk:Fear: Anti-Semitism in Poland after Auschwitz Is it appropriate to use a represntative quote by the book's author stated it's main thesis, as well as quotes from favorable book reviews, even if some editors find the POV of the book objectionable
  • Talk:Master Mahan Is the "Master Mahan — Master Mason Theory" Verifiable, keeping to Neutral Point of View, or not Original Research? Is it worthy of inclusion in the article?


Requests for comment (All)
Articles (All)
Non-articles (All)
InstructionsTo add a discussion to this list:
  • Add the tag {{rfc|xxx}} at the top of a talk page section, where "xxx" is the category abbreviation. The different category abbreviations that should be used with {{rfc}} are listed above in parenthesis. Multiple categories are separated by a vertical pipe. For example, {{rfc|xxx|yyy}}, where "xxx" is the first category and "yyy" is the second category.
For more information, see Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment. Report problems to Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment. Lists are updated every hour by Legobot.

For more information, see User:RFC bot

Template:RFChist list: Difference between revisions Add topic