Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 04:28, 19 June 2008

Archives

Pre-March March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008

If you leave a message here, I'll reply here. The same applies to you. If I leave a message on your page, I keep it watchlisted and I'll see when you reply.

Don't mess with my user page please.

I see you've discovered the Misplaced Pages. If you want to experiment with deleting barnstars, perhaps your own user page would be the best place to start. Sukiari (talk) 00:52, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

1)You're wrong. 2)The barnstar was given by a banned vandal. Enigma 00:54, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

LULZ - Don't mess with him Enigmaman! By the way, scale down the god damn alcohol. Scarian 01:02, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

your edit to WGA participants list

Based on this diff, why did you remove several users from the list who are not you, and didn't remove yourself? I will revert you if you do not respond within 24 hours. Dr. Cash (talk) 01:52, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

1)I'm not on the list. 2)Those users are no longer active on Misplaced Pages. Enigma 02:05, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

I left a comment with the guy who made the ultimatum. I remember seeing a few users getting told off for that sort of thing over at the Nirvana/Foo Fighters articles. It's really not such a great way to get things done around here. Scarian 15:35, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for explaining yourself, although I wish that you had left it on my talk page, and not yours, since I didn't immediately see it. I wish that you had provided a more clear edit history so that your actions would be more clear. I re-added two individuals to the list that, according to edit contribution history, still appear to be active.

As for my "ultimatum"; I don't consider myself making an ultimatum. I was merely trying to communicate a timetable for my actions to let you know when I might respond. Unfortunately, this was misinterpreted by some rogue administrator. Dr. Cash (talk) 15:45, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Responding is one thing, threatening to revert is another. As it says on the top of my talk page, "If you leave a message here, I'll reply here." Enigma 16:37, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Old CfD

I have officially closed that 3 year old CFD, thanks for the heads up on the unfinished paperwork. Useight (talk) 05:18, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

I have also closed and deleted that second category of which you spoke. Useight (talk) 16:18, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! Enigma 16:37, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

DJ I-Dee & Solitude (Album)

Greetings Enigmaman,

Thanks for offering to help me out in regards to these two pages. I made changes and updated references on the two pages that you put up on the AfD list. Please give me your thoughts and let me know if there is anything else that you'd recommend changing and/or removing in order to keep my page. I'd greatly appreciate it! Thanks.

-Isaac (DJ I-Dee)Djidee (talk) 20:37, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

I liked your last edits to the article. Keep up the good work! The article is in better shape than it was a day ago, that's for sure. Enigma 21:19, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Regarding AFD guildlines

Thanks for clearing that up. This is all new to me so I really appreciate any insight whatsoever.Djidee (talk) 22:46, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

When you have a further comment, you can indent (indent using : and/or *) under your vote/!vote or indent under the comment you wish to comment on. Enigma 22:47, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

What is your problem?

Why are you edit warring? Now it is two-to-one. Please follow the rules.72.0.36.36 (talk) 22:52, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

What's two to one? You make no sense. Enigma 22:54, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

• Name-calling!!? Physician, heal thyself! You've called me so many names today I've lost count. So far, from recent memory, you said I'm bullying, "tag-teaming" you, "forcing my will upon you" (sounds like rape), and a few more. Misplaced Pages would be better without the excessive name-calling you've engaged in. You blamed Chrisjnelson for all the problems. I posit that some of those problems were caused by yourself. Enigma 23:39, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, never mentioned rape. Pointing out behavior is not calling you a name. One may not be a bully per se but may, in theory, engage in bulling bahvior. "Bullying" and "Tag-teaming" are not names I am calling you. I am offering may opinion about behaviors I have witnessed. Good people can do foolish things from time to time. I don't call you stupid, or dumb, or whatever I give my opinion on certain acts, or behaviors. I do it that way as to not name-call. I think there is a difference. Name calling tries to belittle and diminish, criticizing actions is an attempt to have those actions ceased. 72.0.36.36 (talk) 00:42, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Fair enough, then. You claimed on IndeBiz's page that others were engaging in name-calling and incivility. I'd like to see the evidence, please. Obviously, Chrisjnelson is not relevant because he's blocked and not involved in what happened today. Enigma 00:46, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

If you want to critcize my bahavior that is fine . . . I admit I do things wrong. However, I am not a idiot, or dumb or anything. I admit to being stubborn, though. Look, if there is a real issue in the ChrisLong thing, tell me what it is. Is it ALL the quotes? Some of them? 72.0.36.36 (talk) 01:21, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

You're dodging again. Here you claimed that others were "bullying" you and calling you names. I'm asking for evidence. Enigma 01:23, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Define cluestick. 72.0.36.36 (talk) 04:22, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

• Something that gives clues? Enigma 04:28, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

I thought you were offering an olive branch. I misunderstood the nature of your post. My mistake. Sorry. (I hope you're not a bot.72.0.36.36 (talk) 01:36, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

If I were a bot, I'd be doing my best to deny it, so you can't take my word for it either way. I simply wanted to know where I or anyone else today called you names. You keep saying you're being bullied and rolled over. Sorry, I don't see it. Since I probably am a bot, I don't have a mood or anything like that, so I am incapable of offering olive branches. Enigma 01:39, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

The "I hope you're not a bot" comment stems from the bottom section of his/her talk page. Ksy92003 (talk) 01:59, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Indeed. I saw his response to SineBot. Us bots need to stick together in bad times, and I was ready to defend SineBot when I noticed that both you and Pats1 commented. Enigma 02:01, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Huh?

Are you accusing me of bullying? --InDeBiz1 (talk) 22:56, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Ahh, gotcha. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Cheers! --InDeBiz1 (talk) 23:01, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Don't sweat it

I have worked around the bureaucracy, per WP:IAR. News of the weird has this running gag about the middle name "Wayne".... -- Kendrick7 04:01, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Ah, I see the article you've created. It's most likely going to be deleted again, although I do agree that deleting and salting is not the proper course of action. If it's a BLP nightmare, then remove the defamatory material and protect it. Simple enough. Enigma 04:05, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, well, as the man who fell off the skyscaper said to himself on the way down, so far, so good. Like I said at the BLP noticeboard, the guy is notable for scandalmongering. I'm sure Paula Jones would have had the same problem if[REDACTED] was around in '92. Insomuchas the sources are skeptical, the article is skeptical, so I don't think there's a real BLP problem here. These media side shows happen every election. -- Kendrick7 04:19, 19 June 2008 (UTC)