| Revision as of 12:38, 22 June 2008 editSennen goroshi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers5,008 edits not required← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:47, 22 June 2008 edit undoSennen goroshi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers5,008 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Objection to my revert == | == Objection to my revert == | ||
| Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
| ::I've reverted your edits again. Ameliorate is right, and your edits to the 'doctor example' make the example pointless. <span style="background:#BBBDFF">]</span> 12:27, 22 June 2008 (UTC) | ::I've reverted your edits again. Ameliorate is right, and your edits to the 'doctor example' make the example pointless. <span style="background:#BBBDFF">]</span> 12:27, 22 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :::: WTF? how does the gender of the doctor example make the slightest bit of difference to the section? That is fucking absurd. ] (]) 12:47, 22 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:47, 22 June 2008
Objection to my revert
Hi, I am sorry if I reverted your good-faith edit, however to me it appears to be non-constructive. Can you please explain the meaning of adding "... for some people" (line 1 of the diff) and the purpose of changing the gender on line 23? On a side note, regarding your edit summary, one does not need consensus to revert vandalism. ~ Ameliorate U T @ 12:13, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- I've reverted your edits again. Ameliorate is right, and your edits to the 'doctor example' make the example pointless. Channel ® 12:27, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- WTF? how does the gender of the doctor example make the slightest bit of difference to the section? That is fucking absurd. Sennen goroshi (talk) 12:47, 22 June 2008 (UTC)