Template:RFChist list: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:00, 13 August 2008 editRFC bot (talk \| contribs)216,124 editsm Update, 15 current discussions← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:01, 16 August 2008 edit undoRFC bot (talk \| contribs)216,124 editsm Update, 14 current discussionsNext edit →
Line 11:		Line 11:
	* <strong>]</strong> dispute as to whether money can consist of material with intrinsic value without a certifying authority, or whether it requires a "trusted" certifying authority (also reported to RFChist)		* <strong>]</strong> dispute as to whether money can consist of material with intrinsic value without a certifying authority, or whether it requires a "trusted" certifying authority (also reported to RFChist)
	* <strong>]</strong> User is alleging article is corporate vanity		* <strong>]</strong> User is alleging article is corporate vanity
	* <strong>]</strong> Editors cannot verify citations for controversial sentences

	{{#ifeq:{{{hide_instructions}}}\|yes\| \|{{RFC tagging instructions\|RFChist}} }}		{{#ifeq:{{{hide_instructions}}}\|yes\| \|{{RFC tagging instructions\|RFChist}} }}

Revision as of 09:01, 16 August 2008

The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:

Talk:Negroid image may reflect out of date or racist science
Talk:Pearl Harbor advance-knowledge debate Is this article too long and should it follow a "For vs. Against" outline for clarity?
Talk:Thomas Hobbes Are there sufficient reliable, secondary sources to warrant calling Thomas Hobbes a classical republican?
Talk:Miroslav Filipović Are eye witness accounts from a controversial work, Magnum crimen, considered reliable sources
Talk:Taxila Is Taxila Ancient India or Ancient Pakistan
Talk:Northport, New York back and forth edits on historic importance of current and future events, appropriateness of naming businesses, and notability of a weekly sale. Arguments for and against are listed in the section above and here
Talk:1984 Request help with whether comments constitute weasel words.
Talk:September 11, 2001 attacks Whether it is good or bad proses to use the word "attacks" to define "attack" and whether or not it is original research to use a wikipedia-created title in the introductory sentence rather than the terminology used by respected reliable sources such as CNN, CBC, CBS, and the BBC.
Talk:Money dispute as to whether money can consist of material with intrinsic value without a certifying authority, or whether it requires a "trusted" certifying authority (also reported to RFChist)
Talk:Flag of Dorset User is alleging article is corporate vanity

v t e Requests for comment (All)
Articles (All)	Biographies (bio) Economy, trade, and companies (econ) History and geography (hist) Language and linguistics (lang) Maths, science, and technology (sci) Media, the arts, and architecture (media) Politics, government, and law (pol) Religion and philosophy (reli) Society, sports, and culture (soc)
Non-articles (All)	Misplaced Pages style and naming (style) Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines (policy) WikiProjects and collaborations (proj) Misplaced Pages technical issues and templates (tech) Misplaced Pages proposals (prop) Unsorted
Instructions	To add a discussion to this list: Add the tag `{{rfc\|xxx}}` at the top of a talk page section, where "xxx" is the category abbreviation. The different category abbreviations that should be used with {{rfc}} are listed above in parenthesis. Multiple categories are separated by a vertical pipe. For example, `{{rfc\|xxx\|yyy}}`, where "xxx" is the first category and "yyy" is the second category.
For more information, see Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment. Report problems to Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment. Lists are updated every hour by Legobot.

For more information, see User:RFC bot