Misplaced Pages

Template:RFChist list: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:02, 21 August 2008 editRFC bot (talk | contribs)216,124 editsm Update, 17 current discussions← Previous edit Revision as of 18:24, 28 August 2008 edit undoRFC bot (talk | contribs)216,124 editsm Update, 18 current discussionsNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
'''The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:''' '''The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:'''


* <strong>]</strong> Should over half the demographics section dicuss Islam, a small group in Rwanda (see ]). Also, issues pertaining to ] remain ongoing.
* <strong>]</strong> Is this article mostly original research, and does it violate several other guidelines? * <strong>]</strong> Is this article mostly original research, and does it violate several other guidelines?
* <strong>]</strong> Should there be an extra comma after the year? What is the proper grammar to use in this situation? With this discussion, there is also a possibility of renaming the article. Please discuss.
* <strong>]</strong> To find a solution on whether or not using "Beit Guvrin" as Bayt Jibrin's original Aramaic name in the article. * <strong>]</strong> To find a solution on whether or not using "Beit Guvrin" as Bayt Jibrin's original Aramaic name in the article.
* <strong>]</strong> image may reflect out of date or racist science * <strong>]</strong> image may reflect out of date or racist science
Line 9: Line 9:
* <strong>]</strong> Are eye witness accounts from a controversial work, ], considered reliable sources * <strong>]</strong> Are eye witness accounts from a controversial work, ], considered reliable sources
* <strong>]</strong> Is Taxila Ancient India or Ancient Pakistan * <strong>]</strong> Is Taxila Ancient India or Ancient Pakistan
* <strong>]</strong> back and forth edits on historic importance of current and future events, appropriateness of naming businesses, and notability of a weekly sale. Arguments for and against are listed in the section above and ]
* <strong>]</strong> Request help with whether comments constitute weasel words.
* <strong>]</strong> Whether it is good or bad proses to use the word "attacks" to define "attack" and whether or not it is original research to use a wikipedia-created title in the introductory sentence rather than the terminology used by respected reliable sources such as CNN, CBC, CBS, and the BBC.
* <strong>]</strong> dispute as to whether money can consist of material with intrinsic value without a certifying authority, or whether it requires a "trusted" certifying authority (also reported to RFChist)


{{#ifeq:{{{hide_instructions}}}|yes| |{{RFC tagging instructions|RFChist}} }} {{#ifeq:{{{hide_instructions}}}|yes| |{{RFC tagging instructions|RFChist}} }}

Revision as of 18:24, 28 August 2008

The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:


Requests for comment (All)
Articles (All)
Non-articles (All)
InstructionsTo add a discussion to this list:
  • Add the tag {{rfc|xxx}} at the top of a talk page section, where "xxx" is the category abbreviation. The different category abbreviations that should be used with {{rfc}} are listed above in parenthesis. Multiple categories are separated by a vertical pipe. For example, {{rfc|xxx|yyy}}, where "xxx" is the first category and "yyy" is the second category.
For more information, see Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment. Report problems to Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment. Lists are updated every hour by Legobot.

For more information, see User:RFC bot

Template:RFChist list: Difference between revisions Add topic