Misplaced Pages

User talk:Drmies: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:04, 1 January 2008 view sourceCydebot (talk | contribs)6,812,251 editsm Robot - Removing category WelcomeBotResearch per CFD at Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 December 24.← Previous edit Revision as of 21:23, 8 September 2008 view source Pahadiraja (talk | contribs)567 edits Arundhati: new sectionNext edit →
Line 76: Line 76:
:#violate Wikipdedia style guidelines, although they undoubtably read better. :#violate Wikipdedia style guidelines, although they undoubtably read better.
:See my changes to your edits in for what I see as the problems. — ] | ] 19:34, 13 September 2007 (UTC) :See my changes to your edits in for what I see as the problems. — ] | ] 19:34, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

== Arundhati ==

Thanks for updating her page now it is expressing her all information including critical one also.I regret my act put I was fed up with '''user ::Zencv''' who was just not allowing us to include her latest alleged controversial act.Thanks a lot.

Revision as of 21:23, 8 September 2008

Welcome!

Hello, Drmies! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Eric Wester 03:39, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Judgmental comments

Drmies, welcome to Misplaced Pages. Your edits have been extremely helpful at cleaning up a number of articles. Messy, poorly-edited pieces are a huge problem here, not the the least because of piecemeal changes without an eye for narrative, and simple sloppiness on the part of contributors. Nonetheless, I think you should refrain from making judgments and dismissive comments about articles. Referring to things as "terrible," "messy," "horrible," or any similar terms is really unnecessary, adding a sense of know-it-all-ism and disdain for others that benefits no one. Moreover, it may very well scare away contributors who would benefit from not necessarily a polite correction, but rather a succinct and objective one. Furthermore, it's in no way specific, so really tells other editors only your opinion.

Thank you, Stakhanov 20:29, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

I would like to add that some of your edits:
  1. don't work because of properties of the Wiki which you may not be familiar with, or
  2. violate Wikipdedia style guidelines, although they undoubtably read better.
See my changes to your edits in Golden ratio for what I see as the problems. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 19:34, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Arundhati

Thanks for updating her page now it is expressing her all information including critical one also.I regret my act put I was fed up with user ::Zencv who was just not allowing us to include her latest alleged controversial act.Thanks a lot.

User talk:Drmies: Difference between revisions Add topic