Revision as of 07:13, 9 September 2008 editEveryme (talk | contribs)3,624 edits →Editor assistance: other suggestions← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:14, 9 September 2008 edit undoEveryme (talk | contribs)3,624 editsm →Editor assistance: tNext edit → | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
{{talkback|tp=1|Misplaced Pages:Editor assistance/Requests|Reliable sources}} | {{talkback|tp=1|Misplaced Pages:Editor assistance/Requests|Reliable sources}} | ||
Since you commented on the difficulties of reading |
Since you commented on the difficulties of reading and following our indeed very complex set of policies and guidelines, I feel compelled to expand a little on that. You're indeed right that our rules are very hard to understand for new editors. Please consider, however, that we're very frequently dealing with people who ''wrongly'' claim to have expert knowledge and to edit neutrally. This makes it necessary for us to explicitly state some rules concerning encyclopedic standards, more so than it is in a preselected academic environment where such rules (and even more of them, as you know) are being understood as part of the very fabric and frame of what constitutes an academic setting. We do not have that luxury, but all you really need to keep in mind is the ''spirit'' of our most basic rules, including ], ], ], but also ] and ]. | ||
The best idea if you're not yet familiar with our admittedly intricate and initially confusing ruleset is to follow the basic suggestions outlined at ]. <span style="font-family:lucida sans, console;">''''']:]'''''</span> 07:13, 9 September 2008 (UTC) | The best idea if you're not yet familiar with our admittedly intricate and initially confusing ruleset is to follow the basic suggestions outlined at ]. <span style="font-family:lucida sans, console;">''''']:]'''''</span> 07:13, 9 September 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:14, 9 September 2008
Proposed deletion of Preservation of Persian music
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Preservation of Persian music, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Eastlaw (talk) 21:49, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Third opinion project
User Doctorlloydmiller posted the following message (diff) on WP:3O:
"#I don't understand why when my book is listed as a reliable source for Persian Traditional Music on Misplaced Pages, everything I added to the article on Persian music or any other place on Misplaced Pages, even just a word or two, was viciously deleted as if I was some horrible stupid know-nothing and unwelcome intruder. In the world of Persian music, I am accepted as one of the scholars and my book has been called "the last word" on Persian muaic; so why would Misplaced Pages despise my every effort to submit material and seemingly block every word I have spend hours preparing? Dr. Lloyd Miller, PhD Persian literature and music. 00:49, 8 September 2008 (UTC)"
WP:3O's specific brief is to offer neutral third opinions on disputes between two editors. Its posting guidelines are further specified in the Misplaced Pages:Third opinion#How to list a dispute section of the project page.
Because the post blockquoted above ignored both the project's scope and its guidelines, it very likely will be removed by one of the project volunteers. You are welcome to post on the project's talk page (Misplaced Pages talk:Third opinion) if you have further questions about this. — Athaenara ✉ 01:40, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Conflict of interest warning
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Misplaced Pages, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
- linking to the Misplaced Pages article or website of your organization in other articles (see Misplaced Pages:Spam); and,
- avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Misplaced Pages when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines.
I recommend that you post on the Misplaced Pages:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. This may have very positive results: neutral editors and admins there are often quite helpful when a COI editor seeks assistance in complying with the encyclopedia's policies and guidelines. — Athaenara ✉ 01:51, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Editor assistance
Hello, Doctorlloydmiller. You have new messages at Misplaced Pages:Editor assistance/Requests.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Since you commented on the difficulties of reading and following our indeed very complex set of policies and guidelines, I feel compelled to expand a little on that. You're indeed right that our rules are very hard to understand for new editors. Please consider, however, that we're very frequently dealing with people who wrongly claim to have expert knowledge and to edit neutrally. This makes it necessary for us to explicitly state some rules concerning encyclopedic standards, more so than it is in a preselected academic environment where such rules (and even more of them, as you know) are being understood as part of the very fabric and frame of what constitutes an academic setting. We do not have that luxury, but all you really need to keep in mind is the spirit of our most basic rules, including WP:NPOV, WP:V, WP:OR, but also WP:BOLD and WP:IAR.
The best idea if you're not yet familiar with our admittedly intricate and initially confusing ruleset is to follow the basic suggestions outlined at Misplaced Pages:Writing better articles. user:Everyme 07:13, 9 September 2008 (UTC)