Misplaced Pages

User talk:92.235.197.107: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:19, 30 November 2008 editZzuuzz (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators136,930 edits declined← Previous edit Revision as of 10:39, 30 November 2008 edit undo92.235.197.107 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 64: Line 64:


{{unblock reviewed|1=Good Evening, can someone please unblock me? I heavily suspect FisherQueen has some sort of vendetta and I can't work out why. I feel my recent edits were constructive and ask that this block be reviewed. Even a shorter one would be fine but a month is a VERY long time. Peace out|decline=Good evening. This IP does nothing but vandalise, and so this block is endorsed. — -- ] <sup>]</sup> 01:19, 30 November 2008 (UTC)}} {{unblock reviewed|1=Good Evening, can someone please unblock me? I heavily suspect FisherQueen has some sort of vendetta and I can't work out why. I feel my recent edits were constructive and ask that this block be reviewed. Even a shorter one would be fine but a month is a VERY long time. Peace out|decline=Good evening. This IP does nothing but vandalise, and so this block is endorsed. — -- ] <sup>]</sup> 01:19, 30 November 2008 (UTC)}}

{{unblock|Good Morrow to thee. The last admin flat out refused to unblock me. I suspect they are mentally deficient and don't recognise contructive edits. (By constructive I mean entertaining - that's what this[REDACTED] thing is all about rite???) Anyway, unblock please. Thanks dawg}}

Revision as of 10:39, 30 November 2008

October 2008

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit you made to Puppy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. SoWhy 16:08, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to User talk:SoWhy constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. SoWhy 16:13, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Puppy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Ron Ritzman (talk) 16:14, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:SoWhy. SoWhy 16:21, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to User talk:Ron Ritzman. If you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, you will be blocked from editing. Ron Ritzman (talk) 16:21, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. —Wknight94 (talk) 16:29, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit you made to Kitten has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Flewis 14:28, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to User:Discospinster/Awards and barnstars constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. PeterSymonds (talk) 14:30, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Kitten. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. PeterSymonds (talk) 14:34, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Skateboard, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Skateboard was changed by 92.235.197.107 (u) (t) deleting 11030 characters on 2008-10-26T04:56:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 10:26, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Dundee constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Shell 10:27, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Forfar. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Shell 10:28, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User:Shell Kinney. Shell 10:31, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Misplaced Pages username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Shell 10:35, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

92.235.197.107 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi there, let me tell you a story. I was happily trawling through[REDACTED] this fine day when I noticed a couple of articles could use a bit of improvement. What do I get in return? A violent rebuttal! The gates are slammed shut! I'm wandering outside alone! Please wikipedia! Take me back!

Decline reason:

Edits such as, this, this and this are not 'improvements'. — Raven4x4x (talk) 10:51, 26 October 2008 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

92.235.197.107 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Can someone please unblock me? My recent edits aren't appreciated by some higher-ups in the[REDACTED] hierarchy. Thanks in advance.

Decline reason:

Let's see... Chances of improving the encyclopedia: close to none. No thanks, then. — -- lucasbfr 11:22, 26 October 2008 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

92.235.197.107 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your lack of faith is disturbing

Decline reason:

The {unblock} template is for use by people who may have been improperly blocked; you are a blatant vandal, so the template isn't meant for you, and we'd appreciate it if you stopped using it. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:52, 26 October 2008 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

November 2008

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit you made to Cheesesteak has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Igoldste (talk) 16:45, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to User talk:89.190.222.149 constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. - Unpopular Opinion (talk) 19:37, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit you made to Kitten has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. George The Dragon (talk) 12:32, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to User talk:Shell Kinney constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. George The Dragon (talk) 12:32, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Kirriemuir. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. MatthewYeager 12:32, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to 2008 Brazilian Grand Prix. If you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, you will be blocked from editing. JohnCD (talk) 12:34, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Acroterion (talk) 12:50, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

92.235.197.107 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have been wronged. I want to be righted. I am very regretful of my actions - in fact I'm on my way to confession right now. Can I please be unblocked?

Decline reason:

No. To prevent you from making more time-wasting unblock requests, this page has been protected. MaxSem 13:09, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit you made to Forfar has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  – iridescent 23:27, 29 November 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did to Skateboard. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Skateboard was changed by 92.235.197.107 (u) (t) deleting 10849 characters on 2008-11-29T23:36:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:36, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for vandalism. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:38, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

92.235.197.107 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Good Evening, can someone please unblock me? I heavily suspect FisherQueen has some sort of vendetta and I can't work out why. I feel my recent edits were constructive and ask that this block be reviewed. Even a shorter one would be fine but a month is a VERY long time. Peace out

Decline reason:

Good evening. This IP does nothing but vandalise, and so this block is endorsed. — -- zzuuzz 01:19, 30 November 2008 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

92.235.197.107 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Good Morrow to thee. The last admin flat out refused to unblock me. I suspect they are mentally deficient and don't recognise contructive edits. (By constructive I mean entertaining - that's what this[REDACTED] thing is all about rite???) Anyway, unblock please. Thanks dawg

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Good Morrow to thee. The last admin flat out refused to unblock me. I suspect they are mentally deficient and don't recognise contructive edits. (By constructive I mean entertaining - that's what this[REDACTED] thing is all about rite???) Anyway, unblock please. Thanks dawg |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Good Morrow to thee. The last admin flat out refused to unblock me. I suspect they are mentally deficient and don't recognise contructive edits. (By constructive I mean entertaining - that's what this[REDACTED] thing is all about rite???) Anyway, unblock please. Thanks dawg |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Good Morrow to thee. The last admin flat out refused to unblock me. I suspect they are mentally deficient and don't recognise contructive edits. (By constructive I mean entertaining - that's what this[REDACTED] thing is all about rite???) Anyway, unblock please. Thanks dawg |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Category:
User talk:92.235.197.107: Difference between revisions Add topic