Misplaced Pages

Talk:List of WWE personnel: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:55, 17 October 2005 editBionicWilliam (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers3,808 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 18:56, 17 October 2005 edit undoBionicWilliam (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers3,808 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 10: Line 10:


Furthermore, Would it be more logic to list the Commentators, Backstage Announcers, Ring Announcers, & GM under there specific Brand or would it be to messy Furthermore, Would it be more logic to list the Commentators, Backstage Announcers, Ring Announcers, & GM under there specific Brand or would it be to messy
--] 18:55, 17 October 2005 (UTC) --] 18:56, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:56, 17 October 2005

WikiProject iconProfessional wrestling Unassessed
WikiProject iconList of WWE personnel is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

"Red links"

I'd previously removed some of the wikilinks to articles that don't exist. While red links may encourage articles to be written, the thing is, just because someone works for WWE in some capacity doesn't mean we want to encourage articles to be written about that person. --Jtalledo (talk) 23:11, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

Two Comments about WWE Current Superstar Page I Have 

I suggest instead of putting Jim Ross under Inactive, should not he be under the administration with the title: Executive Vice President, Business Strategies with a mention to his firing in kayfabe?

Furthermore, Would it be more logic to list the Commentators, Backstage Announcers, Ring Announcers, & GM under there specific Brand or would it be to messy --BionicWilliam 18:56, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

Categories:
Talk:List of WWE personnel: Difference between revisions Add topic