| Revision as of 12:48, 22 December 2008 editLankiveil (talk | contribs)27,123 edits →Antonio park primary school: merge← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:06, 23 December 2008 edit undoCRGreathouse (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators12,956 edits →Antonio park primary schoolNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| *'''Comment''' | *'''Comment''' | ||
| *'''Merge''' anything useful (which wouldn't seem to be too much) to ], per the usual procedure for these sorts of articles. ] <sup>(])</sup> 12:48, 22 December 2008 (UTC). | *'''Merge''' anything useful (which wouldn't seem to be too much) to ], per the usual procedure for these sorts of articles. ] <sup>(])</sup> 12:48, 22 December 2008 (UTC). | ||
| *'''Redirect''' or alternately delete. ]<small> (] | ])</small> 22:06, 23 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:06, 23 December 2008
Antonio park primary school
- Antonio park primary school (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article previously PRODed that can be safely named a stub or blank page with no substantial information on this "school". ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez / Talk to me!←at≈:→ 10:56, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete or speedy as advertising. --fvw* 11:01, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\ 11:09, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. The article is pretty rubbish, but on the other hand I think all schools are inherently notable. Arid Zkwelty (talk) 11:22, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
--This user has made little or no contributions outside this discussion. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez / Talk to me!←at≈:→ 11:45, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- Even if you consider all schools notable, they should still meet standard guidelines like not being promotional or being verifiable. - Mgm| 16:39, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- Merge to school district or (if there is no school district article) the article on the locality. -- Eastmain (talk) 15:27, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- If any of these awards can be named and shown to be significant, this would be a no-brain keep. Right now, I'm neutral. - Mgm| 16:39, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Found this reference in regards to United Nations Association of Australia Education Awards in 2004, but there doesn't seem to be anything else to back it up. All the other awards that the school has received appear to be school district "attaboy" awards. Chasingsol (talk) 17:02, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- Comment An article probably could be written about the Australia Sustainable Schools Initiative (AuSSI), but this appears to be one of 52 schools that gets five stars in that program Mandsford (talk) 22:54, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- Merge/redirect to Mitcham, Victoria#Schools per normal practice. TerriersFan (talk) 17:04, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect to Mitcham,_Victoria#Schools. Little Red Riding Hoodtalk 18:34, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- Comment
- Merge anything useful (which wouldn't seem to be too much) to Mitcham, Victoria, per the usual procedure for these sorts of articles. Lankiveil 12:48, 22 December 2008 (UTC).
- Redirect or alternately delete. CRGreathouse (t | c) 22:06, 23 December 2008 (UTC)