Misplaced Pages

Battle of the Coral Sea: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:20, 27 December 2008 editClimie.ca (talk | contribs)9,536 edits Further information← Previous edit Revision as of 12:58, 28 December 2008 edit undoTony1 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors276,760 edits script-assisted date/terms audit; see mosnum, wp:overlinkNext edit →
Line 26: Line 26:
{{FixBunching|end}} {{FixBunching|end}}


The '''Battle of the Coral Sea''', fought between ]], 1942, with most of the action occurring on ] and ], was a major ] in the ] of ] between the ] and the ] forces of the ] and the ]. It was the first fleet action in which ]s engaged each other. It was also the first naval battle in history in which neither side's ships sighted or fired directly upon the other. The '''Battle of the Coral Sea''', fought between May 4 – May 8, 1942, with most of the action occurring on May 7 and May 8, was a major ] in the ] of ] between the ] and the ] forces of the ] and the ]. It was the first fleet action in which ]s engaged each other. It was also the first naval battle in history in which neither side's ships sighted or fired directly upon the other.


It is considered a tactical victory for ], since the United States lost fleet carrier ] in exchange for the light carrier ]. At the same time, the battle was a strategic victory for the Allies because the Japanese abandoned their attempt to land troops to take ], ]. The engagement ended with no clear victor, but the damage suffered and experience gained by both sides set the stage for the ].<ref>{{cite book It is considered a tactical victory for ], since the United States lost fleet carrier ] in exchange for the light carrier ]. At the same time, the battle was a strategic victory for the Allies because the Japanese abandoned their attempt to land troops to take ], ]. The engagement ended with no clear victor, but the damage suffered and experience gained by both sides set the stage for the ].<ref>{{cite book
Line 44: Line 44:


==Background== ==Background==
On ], 1941, using aircraft carriers, ] the US Pacific fleet at ], Hawaii. The attack crippled most of the US Pacific Fleet's battleships. In launching the ], Japanese leaders sought to neutralize US naval power, seize colonies rich in natural resources, and obtain strategic military bases to defend a ]. Soon after, other nations, including the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand joined the U.S. as Allies in the war against Japan. In the words of the Japanese Navy's Combined Fleet Secret Order Number One, dated ], 1941, the goals of the initial Japanese campaigns in the impending war were to, "(eject) British and American strength from the Netherlands Indies and the Philippines, (and) to establish a policy of autonomous self-sufficiency and economic independence."<ref>Parker, ''A Priceless Advantage'', p. 3.</ref> The plan was to set up a defensive perimeter around Japan to protect its production facilities and ensure victory in the ]. More importantly, given the lack of raw materials in the Japanese ], Japan hoped to protect its shipping routes so the much needed raw materials and oil could be shipped without interruption. To support these goals, during the first few months of 1942 Japanese forces also attacked and took control of the ], ], ], ], the ], ], ], and ].<ref>Murray, ''War to be Won'', p. 169–195</ref> On December 7, 1941, using aircraft carriers, ] the US Pacific fleet at ], Hawaii. The attack crippled most of the US Pacific Fleet's battleships. In launching the ], Japanese leaders sought to neutralize US naval power, seize colonies rich in natural resources, and obtain strategic military bases to defend a ]. Soon after, other nations, including the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand joined the U.S. as Allies in the war against Japan. In the words of the Japanese Navy's Combined Fleet Secret Order Number One, dated November 1, 1941, the goals of the initial Japanese campaigns in the impending war were to, "(eject) British and American strength from the Netherlands Indies and the Philippines, (and) to establish a policy of autonomous self-sufficiency and economic independence."<ref>Parker, ''A Priceless Advantage'', p. 3.</ref> The plan was to set up a defensive perimeter around Japan to protect its production facilities and ensure victory in the ]. More importantly, given the lack of raw materials in the Japanese ], Japan hoped to protect its shipping routes so the much needed raw materials and oil could be shipped without interruption. To support these goals, during the first few months of 1942 Japanese forces also attacked and took control of the ], ], ], ], the ], ], ], and ].<ref>Murray, ''War to be Won'', p. 169–195</ref>


] ], commander of the Japanese 4th Fleet (also called the South Seas Force) consisting of most of the naval units in the South Pacific area, advocated the seizing of ], ], and ] in ] and ] in the ]. Inoue believed that the capture and control of these locations would provide greater security for the major Japanese base at ] on New Britain. Japan's ] endorsed Inoue's argument and began planning further operations, using these locations as supporting bases, to seize ], ], ], ], and ] and thereby cut the supply lines between Australia and the United States, with the goal of reducing or eliminating Australia as a threat to Japanese positions in the South Pacific.<ref>Parker, ''A Priceless Advantage'', p. 5, and Frank, ''Guadalcanal'', p. 21–22.</ref> ] ], commander of the Japanese 4th Fleet (also called the South Seas Force) consisting of most of the naval units in the South Pacific area, advocated the seizing of ], ], and ] in ] and ] in the ]. Inoue believed that the capture and control of these locations would provide greater security for the major Japanese base at ] on New Britain. Japan's ] endorsed Inoue's argument and began planning further operations, using these locations as supporting bases, to seize ], ], ], ], and ] and thereby cut the supply lines between Australia and the United States, with the goal of reducing or eliminating Australia as a threat to Japanese positions in the South Pacific.<ref>Parker, ''A Priceless Advantage'', p. 5, and Frank, ''Guadalcanal'', p. 21–22.</ref>
Line 67: Line 67:
===Tulagi=== ===Tulagi===
{{Details|Invasion of Tulagi (May 1942)}} {{Details|Invasion of Tulagi (May 1942)}}
''Lexington'' joined ''Yorktown'' on ]. The Japanese occupied Tulagi without incident on ], and began construction of a seaplane base. After fueling, ''Yorktown'' closed on Tulagi and on ] launched three successful strikes against Japanese ships and aircraft there, revealing her presence, yet sinking the ] ] and five merchantmen, crippling the island's ] reconnaissance capability, and damaging other vessels. ''Yorktown'' then retired south to rendezvous with the ''Lexington'' and the newly-arrived ]s. ''Lexington'' joined ''Yorktown'' on May 1. The Japanese occupied Tulagi without incident on May 3, and began construction of a seaplane base. After fueling, ''Yorktown'' closed on Tulagi and on May 4 launched three successful strikes against Japanese ships and aircraft there, revealing her presence, yet sinking the ] ] and five merchantmen, crippling the island's ] reconnaissance capability, and damaging other vessels. ''Yorktown'' then retired south to rendezvous with the ''Lexington'' and the newly-arrived ]s.


===]=== ===May 6===
Land-based ] attacked the approaching Port Moresby invasion fleet on ] with the usual lack of success. Almost another year would pass before the ] realized high-altitude bombing attacks against moving naval targets were pointless. Although both carrier groups flew extensive searches on ], cloudy weather kept them hidden from each other, and the two sides spent the night only 110 kilometres (70&nbsp;mi) apart. Other Allied aircraft joined the battle, from airbases at ] and ] on ], Australia. Land-based ] attacked the approaching Port Moresby invasion fleet on May 6 with the usual lack of success. Almost another year would pass before the ] realized high-altitude bombing attacks against moving naval targets were pointless. Although both carrier groups flew extensive searches on May 6, cloudy weather kept them hidden from each other, and the two sides spent the night only 110 kilometres (70&nbsp;mi) apart. Other Allied aircraft joined the battle, from airbases at ] and ] on ], Australia.
] ]


That night, Fletcher, whose role was to protect Port Moresby, made the difficult decision to detach Crace to block the probable course of an invasion. Fletcher and Crace knew exposing surface ships to attack by land-based aircraft without air cover risked a repeat of the ] five months before. Their fears were nearly realized when the cruisers were spotted and came under an intense air attack from a squadron of ]s on the afternoon of ]. The ships escaped with few casualties and little damage. Only minutes after the Japanese raid Crace's force was inadvertently attacked by friendly B-17s. ''Farragut'' and ''Perkins'' once again had to endure near misses. That night, Fletcher, whose role was to protect Port Moresby, made the difficult decision to detach Crace to block the probable course of an invasion. Fletcher and Crace knew exposing surface ships to attack by land-based aircraft without air cover risked a repeat of the ] five months before. Their fears were nearly realized when the cruisers were spotted and came under an intense air attack from a squadron of ]s on the afternoon of May 7. The ships escaped with few casualties and little damage. Only minutes after the Japanese raid Crace's force was inadvertently attacked by friendly B-17s. ''Farragut'' and ''Perkins'' once again had to endure near misses.


].]] ].]]


===]=== ===May 7===
On ], both fleets launched all available aircraft, but neither found the main body of the other, mistakenly attacking subsidiary enemy forces instead. Japanese aircraft found and attacked the U.S. ] ] and her escorting destroyer ], mistaking them for a carrier and a cruiser. Two waves of torpedo and dive bombers swarmed over both ships resulting in ''Sims'' being sunk and ''Neosho'' crippled. On May 7, both fleets launched all available aircraft, but neither found the main body of the other, mistakenly attacking subsidiary enemy forces instead. Japanese aircraft found and attacked the U.S. ] ] and her escorting destroyer ], mistaking them for a carrier and a cruiser. Two waves of torpedo and dive bombers swarmed over both ships resulting in ''Sims'' being sunk and ''Neosho'' crippled.


Meanwhile, U.S. aircraft, sent in the wrong direction by a miscoded contact report, had missed ''Shōkaku'' and ''Zuikaku'' but found the invasion fleet, escorted by the small carrier ''Shōhō'', which was soon sunk with heavy casualties. In the previous five months, the Allies had lost numerous major warships and had been unable to sink a single major Japanese combatant in return. ''Shōhō'' was small by carrier standards, but the ] phrase “scratch one ],” radioed back to ''Lexington'' by then-] ],<ref></ref> announced the first Allied naval success of the Pacific War. Dixon's phrase was quoted by ''Chicago Tribune'' war correspondent Stanley Johnston in a June 1942 article and subsequently requoted in most accounts of the Pacific War.<ref name="proceedings">Mason (June 1982, )p.45.</ref> ''Lexington'''s commanding officer, Captain Frederick C. Sherman, USN, credited Dixon with coining the word "flattop" which became standard slang for an aircraft carrier.<ref name="proceedings"/> Meanwhile, U.S. aircraft, sent in the wrong direction by a miscoded contact report, had missed ''Shōkaku'' and ''Zuikaku'' but found the invasion fleet, escorted by the small carrier ''Shōhō'', which was soon sunk with heavy casualties. In the previous five months, the Allies had lost numerous major warships and had been unable to sink a single major Japanese combatant in return. ''Shōhō'' was small by carrier standards, but the ] phrase “scratch one ],” radioed back to ''Lexington'' by then-] ],<ref></ref> announced the first Allied naval success of the Pacific War. Dixon's phrase was quoted by ''Chicago Tribune'' war correspondent Stanley Johnston in a June 1942 article and subsequently requoted in most accounts of the Pacific War.<ref name="proceedings">Mason (June 1982, )p.45.</ref> ''Lexington'''s commanding officer, Captain Frederick C. Sherman, USN, credited Dixon with coining the word "flattop" which became standard slang for an aircraft carrier.<ref name="proceedings"/>


===]=== ===May 8===
Finally, with dawn searches on ], the main carrier forces located one another and launched maximum effort raids, which passed each other in the air. Hidden by rain, ''Zuikaku'' escaped detection, but ''Shōkaku'' was hit three times by bombs. Her deck damaged, ''Shōkaku'' was unable to land her aircraft and effectively put out of action. Finally, with dawn searches on May 8, the main carrier forces located one another and launched maximum effort raids, which passed each other in the air. Hidden by rain, ''Zuikaku'' escaped detection, but ''Shōkaku'' was hit three times by bombs. Her deck damaged, ''Shōkaku'' was unable to land her aircraft and effectively put out of action.


]. Note planes parked aft, where fires have not yet reached.]] ]


''Lexington''s CXAM-1 ] detected the inbound Japanese aircraft at a range of 68 mi<!--assuming nm given Macintyre--> (126 km),<ref name="macintyre">Macintyre, Donald, Captain, RN. "Shipborne Radar", in ''United States Naval Institute Proceedings'', September 1967 p.73</ref> but the Americans underestimated the performance of the ] and positioned their fighters too low to intercept.<ref name="greene">Greene(1995)p.186</ref> Both American carriers were hit: ''Yorktown'' by a bomb; the larger, less maneuverable ''Lexington'' by both bombs and torpedoes. Although the latter survived the immediate damage and was thought to be repairable, leaking aviation fuel exploded a little over an hour later. ''Lexington'' had to be abandoned and ]d to prevent her capture. ''Lexington''s CXAM-1 ] detected the inbound Japanese aircraft at a range of 68 mi<!--assuming nm given Macintyre--> (126 km),<ref name="macintyre">Macintyre, Donald, Captain, RN. "Shipborne Radar", in ''United States Naval Institute Proceedings'', September 1967 p.73</ref> but the Americans underestimated the performance of the ] and positioned their fighters too low to intercept.<ref name="greene">Greene(1995)p.186</ref> Both American carriers were hit: ''Yorktown'' by a bomb; the larger, less maneuverable ''Lexington'' by both bombs and torpedoes. Although the latter survived the immediate damage and was thought to be repairable, leaking aviation fuel exploded a little over an hour later. ''Lexington'' had to be abandoned and ]d to prevent her capture.

Revision as of 12:58, 28 December 2008

Template:FixBunching

Battle of the Coral Sea
Part of the Pacific Theater of World War II
An explosion aboard USS Lexington.
US Navy aircraft carrier Lexington explodes on May 8, 1942, several hours after being heavily damaged in a Japanese carrier air attack
DateMay 4 – May 8, 1942
LocationCoral Sea, between Australia, New Guinea, and the Solomon Islands
Result Japanese tactical victory;
Allied strategic victory
Belligerents
Allied forces including:
 United States
 Australia
Japan Empire of Japan
Commanders and leaders
United States Frank J. Fletcher
Australia John Crace (RN/RAN)
United StatesThomas C. Kinkaid
United States Aubrey Fitch
Empire of Japan Shigeyoshi Inoue
Empire of Japan Takeo Takagi
Empire of Japan Kiyohide Shima
Empire of Japan Sadamichi Kajioka
Empire of Japan Kuninori Marumo
Empire of Japan Aritomo Gotō
Empire of Japan Chūichi Hara
Strength
2 fleet carriers,
9 cruisers,
13 destroyers,
2 oilers,
1 seaplane tender
2 fleet carriers,
1 light carrier,
9 cruisers,
15 destroyers,
12 smaller warships,
1 oiler,
1 seaplane tender
Casualties and losses
1 fleet carrier,
1 destroyer,
1 oiler sunk,
1 fleet carrier damaged,
65 aircraft destroyed
543 killed and wounded
1 light carrier,
1 destroyer,
3 smaller warships sunk,
1 fleet carrier,
1 destroyer,
2 smaller warships,
1 transport damaged,
69 aircraft destroyed
1,074 killed and wounded
Japanese offensives,
1940–1942
1940

1941

1942

Template:FixBunching

Pacific War
Central Pacific
Indian Ocean (1941–1945)
Southeast Asia
Burma and India
Southwest Pacific
North America
Japan
Manchuria and Northern Korea

Second Sino-Japanese War

Template:FixBunching

New Guinea campaign
1942
1943
1944–45

Template:FixBunching Template:Campaignbox Battle for Australia Template:FixBunching

The Battle of the Coral Sea, fought between May 4 – May 8, 1942, with most of the action occurring on May 7 and May 8, was a major naval battle in the Pacific Theater of World War II between the Imperial Japanese Navy and the Allied forces of the United States Navy and the Royal Australian Navy. It was the first fleet action in which aircraft carriers engaged each other. It was also the first naval battle in history in which neither side's ships sighted or fired directly upon the other.

It is considered a tactical victory for Japan, since the United States lost fleet carrier USS Lexington in exchange for the light carrier Shōhō. At the same time, the battle was a strategic victory for the Allies because the Japanese abandoned their attempt to land troops to take Port Moresby, New Guinea. The engagement ended with no clear victor, but the damage suffered and experience gained by both sides set the stage for the Battle of Midway.

Background

On December 7, 1941, using aircraft carriers, the Japanese attacked the US Pacific fleet at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. The attack crippled most of the US Pacific Fleet's battleships. In launching the Pacific War, Japanese leaders sought to neutralize US naval power, seize colonies rich in natural resources, and obtain strategic military bases to defend a Greater East Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere. Soon after, other nations, including the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand joined the U.S. as Allies in the war against Japan. In the words of the Japanese Navy's Combined Fleet Secret Order Number One, dated November 1, 1941, the goals of the initial Japanese campaigns in the impending war were to, "(eject) British and American strength from the Netherlands Indies and the Philippines, (and) to establish a policy of autonomous self-sufficiency and economic independence." The plan was to set up a defensive perimeter around Japan to protect its production facilities and ensure victory in the Japanese invasion of China. More importantly, given the lack of raw materials in the Japanese Home Islands, Japan hoped to protect its shipping routes so the much needed raw materials and oil could be shipped without interruption. To support these goals, during the first few months of 1942 Japanese forces also attacked and took control of the Philippines, Thailand, Malaya, Singapore, the Dutch East Indies, Wake Island, New Britain, and Guam.

Vice Admiral Shigeyoshi Inoue, commander of the Japanese 4th Fleet (also called the South Seas Force) consisting of most of the naval units in the South Pacific area, advocated the seizing of Lae, Salamaua, and Port Moresby in New Guinea and Tulagi in the Solomon Islands. Inoue believed that the capture and control of these locations would provide greater security for the major Japanese base at Rabaul on New Britain. Japan's Naval General Staff endorsed Inoue's argument and began planning further operations, using these locations as supporting bases, to seize Nauru, Ocean Island, New Caledonia, Fiji, and Samoa and thereby cut the supply lines between Australia and the United States, with the goal of reducing or eliminating Australia as a threat to Japanese positions in the South Pacific.

The Japanese Imperial Army supported the idea of taking Port Moresby and in April 1942, with the Japanese Navy, developed a plan for the attack that was titled Operation Mo. The plan also included the seizure of Tulagi, a small island in the southern Solomon Islands, where a seaplane base would be set up for potential air operations against Allied territories and forces in the South Pacific. Although Japanese Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, commander of the Combined Fleet, was concurrently planning an operation that he hoped would lure the U.S. Navy's Pacific fleet into a decisive showdown in the central Pacific, he detached some of his large warships to support the Mo operation and placed Inoue in charge of the naval portion of the operation.

Forces involved

Further information: Coral Sea order of battle

A large force consisting of one light and two fleet aircraft carriers, a seaplane carrier, nine cruisers, and 13 destroyers, split into several elements, was to guard the Japanese Port Moresby invasion convoy as well as to engage any Allied warships that approached to contest the invasion.

Allied intelligence personnel had deciphered much of the Japanese Mo plans through radio intercepts at the Allied Fleet Radio Unit in Melbourne, Australia and Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. Based on this intelligence, on April 22, Commander in Chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet (CINCPAC) Admiral Chester Nimitz, headquartered at Pearl Harbor, directed Allied forces towards the Coral Sea area to interdict Operation Mo. On April 27, the aircraft carrier USS Yorktown's task force, under the command of Vice Admiral Frank Fletcher, sortied from Tonga and was joined by the carrier USS Lexington's task force near the New Hebrides on May 1. The two task forces, operating semi-independently of each other, prepared to engage any Japanese forces operating in the Coral Sea area.

Prelude to battle

Three Japanese task forces set sail. Two invasion forces headed for the Solomons and Port Moresby, accompanied by a covering force. This force consisted of two large, modern aircraft carriers, Shōkaku and Zuikaku (both veterans of the attack on Pearl Harbor), a smaller carrier, Shōhō, two heavy cruisers, and supporting craft.

Alerted by radio intercepts, the Allies knew Japanese land-based aircraft were being moved south and that an operation was impending. Three main groups opposed the Japanese: Yorktown, which was already in the Coral Sea, Lexington, which was en route (both of which would come under the overall command of Admiral Frank Fletcher) and a joint Allied surface force, Task Force 44, under Australian Rear Admiral John Crace, made up of the cruisers HMAS Australia, HMAS Hobart, and USS Chicago, and destroyers USS Perkins, USS Walke, and USS Farragut. United States carriers Hornet and Enterprise were heading south after the Doolittle Raid on Tokyo, but arrived too late to take part in the battle.

Battle

Map of the battle

Tulagi

Further information: Invasion of Tulagi (May 1942)

Lexington joined Yorktown on May 1. The Japanese occupied Tulagi without incident on May 3, and began construction of a seaplane base. After fueling, Yorktown closed on Tulagi and on May 4 launched three successful strikes against Japanese ships and aircraft there, revealing her presence, yet sinking the destroyer Kikuzuki and five merchantmen, crippling the island's seaplane reconnaissance capability, and damaging other vessels. Yorktown then retired south to rendezvous with the Lexington and the newly-arrived cruisers.

May 6

Land-based B-17s attacked the approaching Port Moresby invasion fleet on May 6 with the usual lack of success. Almost another year would pass before the USAAF realized high-altitude bombing attacks against moving naval targets were pointless. Although both carrier groups flew extensive searches on May 6, cloudy weather kept them hidden from each other, and the two sides spent the night only 110 kilometres (70 mi) apart. Other Allied aircraft joined the battle, from airbases at Cooktown and Mareeba on Cape York Peninsula, Australia.

Shōhō torpedoed by U.S. carrier aircraft late in the morning of 7 May.

That night, Fletcher, whose role was to protect Port Moresby, made the difficult decision to detach Crace to block the probable course of an invasion. Fletcher and Crace knew exposing surface ships to attack by land-based aircraft without air cover risked a repeat of the loss of HMS Prince of Wales and HMS Repulse five months before. Their fears were nearly realized when the cruisers were spotted and came under an intense air attack from a squadron of torpedo bombers on the afternoon of May 7. The ships escaped with few casualties and little damage. Only minutes after the Japanese raid Crace's force was inadvertently attacked by friendly B-17s. Farragut and Perkins once again had to endure near misses.

Shōkaku under attack by aircraft from Yorktown during the morning of 8 May. Flames are visible from a bomb hit on her forecastle.

May 7

On May 7, both fleets launched all available aircraft, but neither found the main body of the other, mistakenly attacking subsidiary enemy forces instead. Japanese aircraft found and attacked the U.S. fleet oiler Neosho and her escorting destroyer Sims, mistaking them for a carrier and a cruiser. Two waves of torpedo and dive bombers swarmed over both ships resulting in Sims being sunk and Neosho crippled.

Meanwhile, U.S. aircraft, sent in the wrong direction by a miscoded contact report, had missed Shōkaku and Zuikaku but found the invasion fleet, escorted by the small carrier Shōhō, which was soon sunk with heavy casualties. In the previous five months, the Allies had lost numerous major warships and had been unable to sink a single major Japanese combatant in return. Shōhō was small by carrier standards, but the laconic phrase “scratch one flattop,” radioed back to Lexington by then-Lieutenant Commander Robert E. Dixon, announced the first Allied naval success of the Pacific War. Dixon's phrase was quoted by Chicago Tribune war correspondent Stanley Johnston in a June 1942 article and subsequently requoted in most accounts of the Pacific War. Lexington's commanding officer, Captain Frederick C. Sherman, USN, credited Dixon with coining the word "flattop" which became standard slang for an aircraft carrier.

May 8

Finally, with dawn searches on May 8, the main carrier forces located one another and launched maximum effort raids, which passed each other in the air. Hidden by rain, Zuikaku escaped detection, but Shōkaku was hit three times by bombs. Her deck damaged, Shōkaku was unable to land her aircraft and effectively put out of action.

Lexington afire and sinking after her crew abandoned ship, May 8. Note planes parked aft, where fires have not yet reached.

Lexingtons CXAM-1 radar detected the inbound Japanese aircraft at a range of 68 mi (126 km), but the Americans underestimated the performance of the Nakajima B5N and positioned their fighters too low to intercept. Both American carriers were hit: Yorktown by a bomb; the larger, less maneuverable Lexington by both bombs and torpedoes. Although the latter survived the immediate damage and was thought to be repairable, leaking aviation fuel exploded a little over an hour later. Lexington had to be abandoned and scuttled to prevent her capture.

Crace continued to stand between the invasion force and Port Moresby. Inoue was misled by returning fliers’ reports as to the strength of the Allied cruiser and destroyer force, and he recalled the invasion fleet. With Shōkaku damaged and Zuikaku short of aircraft, neither was able to take part in the crucial Battle of Midway a month later. The damaged Yorktown returned to Pearl Harbor for repairs.

Aftermath

6 May:
—I Refueling group, Sims and Neosho —II Task force Fox, Lexington and Yorktown
—I Invasion group, Shoho —II Shokaku and Zuikaku

7 May:
—III Cruiser group --- American carrier based bombers
--- Japanese carrier based bombers
--- Allied land based bombers
--- Japanese land based bombers

1. Sims sunk, Neosho damaged.
2. Shoho sunk by carrier aircraft.
3. Cruiser force attacked, no damage.
8 May:
4.Lexington and Yorktown damaged.
5. Shokaku damaged.
6. Lexington sunk.
7. Neosho scuttled 11 May by Henley

Tactical analysis

Despite heavier personnel casualties due to the quick sinking of Shōhō, the Japanese had achieved a narrow tactical victory. One small carrier was lost and a large carrier severely damaged against the Americans’ loss of a large carrier and significant damage to another.

Strategic analysis

In strategic terms, the Allies had won because the seaborne invasion of Port Moresby was averted. Port Moresby was vital to Allied strategy and could not have been defended by the ground forces stationed there. This was the first time that a Japanese invasion force had been turned back without achieving its objective. In addition, it was a moral victory. From the Allied point of view, after five months of continuous defeat in the Pacific, a battle that came out almost even was a victory.

The battle had a substantial effect on the morale and the strategic planning of both sides. Without a hold in New Guinea the subsequent Allied advance, difficult though it was, would have been much harder still. Because their seaborne invasion had failed, the Japanese chose instead to attack Moresby overland. The consequent delay was just long enough to permit the arrival of the veteran Second Australian Imperial Force to fight the Kokoda Track campaign and the Battle of Milne Bay, which in turn relieved pressure on U.S. forces at Guadalcanal.

Carriers

Although Zuikaku was only slightly damaged, with only 40 aircraft left she was in no condition to fight and had to return to Japan to replenish her air wings. Shōkaku was severely damaged, unable to operate aircraft, and took six months to repair. Despite the likely availability of sufficient aircraft between the two ships to re-equip Zuikaku with a composite air group, the Japanese made no serious attempt to get her ready for Midway.

The loss of Lexington was a severe blow, as she was one of the Navy's largest carriers. Yorktown was still able to operate aircraft. Though her damage was estimated to require 90 days of repairs when she arrived at Pearl Harbor on May 27, the Navy Yard worked around the clock and she sailed for Midway on the morning of May 30. Even as she sailed, repair crews remained aboard Yorktown, working to make her more or less battle-worthy.

Responses

The U.S. Navy learned a great deal from the Battle of the Coral Sea. Following the loss of Lexington, better ways to contain aviation fuel and control defensive fighter aircraft were developed. After the costly attacks on the Japanese carriers, it was clear that coordination of dive- and torpedo bombers had to be improved. Most importantly of all, the battle provided a significant morale boost because it showed that the Japanese could be beaten.

Admiral Fletcher continued to command carrier forces and served as the senior USN officer at Midway. Admiral Takagi was relegated to less important assignments in the aftermath of Coral Sea.

See also

Notes

  1. the smaller warships included five minesweepers, 2 minelayers, 2 subchasers, and three gunboats.
  2. Funk and Wagnalls New Encyclopedia (New York, 1986), Volume 7, p. 209, "Coral Sea, Battle of the".
  3. Lundstrom, Guadalcanal Campaign, p. 92. Breakdown of aircraft losses: 19 “Zero” fighters, 19 “Valdive bombers, and 31 “Katetorpedo bombers.
  4. Hakim, Joy (1995). A History of Us: War, Peace and all that Jazz. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-509514-6. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  5. Parker, A Priceless Advantage, p. 3.
  6. Murray, War to be Won, p. 169–195
  7. Parker, A Priceless Advantage, p. 5, and Frank, Guadalcanal, p. 21–22.
  8. Jersey, Hell's Islands, p. 57.
  9. Dull, Imperial Japanese Navy, pp.122–124; D'Albas, p.110; Gill, Royal Australian Navy, p.42; Jersey, Hell's Islands, p.58.
  10. Parker, A Priceless Advantage, p. 11.
  11. Cressman, That Gallant Ship, p. 83–86.
  12. Adm. Robert E. Dixon, Hero of a Naval Battle - New York Times
  13. ^ Mason (June 1982, )p.45.
  14. Macintyre, Donald, Captain, RN. "Shipborne Radar", in United States Naval Institute Proceedings, September 1967 p.73
  15. Greene(1995)p.186
  16. Parshall & Tully, Shattered Sword, pp.65–67.
  17. Paul S. Dull. A Battle History of the Imperial Japanese Navy (1941-1945). Naval Institute Press. p. 134. ISBN 1591142199.
  18. Donald A. David (2006). Lightning Strike. Macmillan. p. 103.

References

Printed sources

  • Brown, David (1990). Warship Losses of World War Two. Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-55750-914-X.
  • Cressman, Robert (2000 (4th printing)). That Gallant Ship U.S.S. Yorktown (CV-5). Missoula, Montana, U.S.A.: Pictorial Histories Publishing Company. ISBN 0-933126-57-3. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |year= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)CS1 maint: year (link)
  • D'Albas, Andrieu (1965). Death of a Navy: Japanese Naval Action in World War II. Devin-Adair Pub. ISBN 0-8159-5302-X.
  • Dull, Paul S. (1978). A Battle History of the Imperial Japanese Navy, 1941-1945. Naval Institute Press. ISBN 0-87021-097-1.
  • Frank, Richard (1990). Guadalcanal: The Definitive Account of the Landmark Battle. New York: Random House. ISBN 0-394-58875-4.
  • Hata, Ikuhiko (1975 (original) 1989 (translation)). Japanese Naval Aces and Fighter Units in World War II. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 0-87021-315-6. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |year= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: year (link)
  • Hayashi, Saburo (1959). Kogun: The Japanese Army in the Pacific War. Marine Corps Association. ASIN B000ID3YRK. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  • Henry, Chris (2003). The Battle of the Coral Sea. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-59114-033-1. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  • Holmes, W. J. (1979). Double-edged Secrets: U.S. Naval Intelligence Operations in the Pacific During World War II. Annapolis, Maryland: Blue Jacket Books/Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-55750-324-9. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  • Hoyt, Edwin P. (2003). Blue Skies and Blood: The Battle of the Coral Sea. I Books. ISBN 0-7434-5835-4. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  • Ito, Masanori (1956 (original) 1962 (translation)). The End of the Imperial Japanese Navy. Jove Books. ISBN 0-515-08682-7. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)CS1 maint: year (link)
  • Jersey, Stanley Coleman (2008). Hell's Islands: The Untold Story of Guadalcanal. College Station, Texas: Texas A&M University Press. ISBN 1-58544-616-5. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  • Lundstrom, John B. (2005 (New edition)). First Team and the Guadalcanal Campaign: Naval Fighter Combat from August to November 1942. Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-59114-472-8. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |year= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)CS1 maint: year (link)
  • Lundstrom, John B. (2005 (New edition)). The First Team: Pacific Naval Air Combat from Pearl Harbor to Midway. Annapolis, Maryland, U.S.A.: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 159114471X. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |year= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)CS1 maint: year (link)
  • Mason, Robert (June 1982). "Eyewitness". United States Naval Institute Proceedings. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  • Millot, Bernard (1974)). The Battle of the Coral Sea. Great Britain: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 0-87021-909-x. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: invalid character (help); Check date values in: |year= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: year (link)
  • Morison, Samuel Eliot (1949 (reissue 2001)). Coral Sea, Midway and Submarine Actions, May 1942-August 1942, vol. 4 of History of United States Naval Operations in World War II. Champaign, Illinois, USA: University of Illinois Press. ISBN 0-252-06995-1. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |year= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)CS1 maint: year (link)
  • Parkin, Robert Sinclair (1995). Blood on the Sea: American Destroyers Lost in World War II. Da Capo Press. ISBN 0-306-81069-7.
  • Parshall, Jonathan (2005). Shattered Sword: The Untold Story of the Battle of Midway. Dulles, VA: Potomac Books. ISBN 1-57488-923-0. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Peattie, Mark R. (1999). Sunburst: The Rise of Japanese Naval Air Power 1909-1941. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-59114-664-X.
  • Rottman, Gordon L. (2005). Japanese Army in World War II: The South Pacific and New Guinea, 1942-43. Oxford and New York: Osprey. ISBN 1-84176-870-7. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Spector, Ronald H. (1985). Eagle Against the Sun: The American War with Japan. New York: The Free Press. ISBN 0-02-930360-5. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  • Stille, Mark (2007). USN Carriers vs IJN Carriers: The Pacific 1942. New York: Osprey. ISBN 978-1-84603-248-6.
  • Toland, John (2003 (1970)). The Rising Sun: The Decline and Fall of the Japanese Empire, 1936-1945. New York: The Modern Library. ISBN 0-8129-6858-1. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |year= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)CS1 maint: year (link)
  • Willmott, H. P. (1982). Empires in the Balance: Japanese and Allied Pacific Strategies to April 1942. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 0-87021-535-3. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  • Willmott, H. P. (2002). The War with Japan: The Period of Balance, May 1942 – October 1943. Wilmington, Delaware: Scholarly Resources Inc. ISBN 0-8420-5032-9. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)

Web

Further information


World War II
General
Topics
Theaters
Aftermath
War crimes
Participants
Allies
Axis
Neutral
Resistance
POWs
Timeline
Prelude
1939
1940
1941
1942
1943
1944
1945
Categories:
Battle of the Coral Sea: Difference between revisions Add topic