Misplaced Pages

User talk:Calabraxthis: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:15, 4 January 2009 editCalabraxthis (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers5,400 edits Alexander Fiske-Harrison: response← Previous edit Revision as of 12:03, 10 January 2009 edit undoDoug Weller (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Oversighters, Administrators264,417 edits Bronze Age: new sectionNext edit →
Line 16: Line 16:
That's a little harsh, warning a user for blanking a COI page they created about themselves rather than apply db-blank to it. I've reverted it back then tagged it appropriately. --] | ] 18:54, 4 January 2009 (UTC) That's a little harsh, warning a user for blanking a COI page they created about themselves rather than apply db-blank to it. I've reverted it back then tagged it appropriately. --] | ] 18:54, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
: I agree in part but s/he was messing around creating gratuitous pages and I applied the wrong warning message inadvertently. I see the page has now been deleted anyway.--'''''<span style= "font-size:large;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]</span><sup>]</sup>''''' 19:15, 4 January 2009 (UTC) : I agree in part but s/he was messing around creating gratuitous pages and I applied the wrong warning message inadvertently. I see the page has now been deleted anyway.--'''''<span style= "font-size:large;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]</span><sup>]</sup>''''' 19:15, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

== ] ==

I've removed the Central Asia stuff as the article it's based on doesn't seem to exist. See the talk page where I also say that Keys isn't the best of sources. Mind you, the recent Inca edit is dodgy, not just the reference but I thought bronze smelting might be older than the Inca. ] (]) 12:03, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:03, 10 January 2009

Archiving icon
Archives

Template:Multicol

Template:Multicol-break

Template:Multicol-end


castletown

can you show me how i went wrong with my edit please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.209.4 (talk) 10:36, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Alexander Fiske-Harrison

That's a little harsh, warning a user for blanking a COI page they created about themselves rather than apply db-blank to it. I've reverted it back then tagged it appropriately. --Blowdart | 18:54, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

I agree in part but s/he was messing around creating gratuitous pages and I applied the wrong warning message inadvertently. I see the page has now been deleted anyway.--Calabraxthis 19:15, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Bronze Age

I've removed the Central Asia stuff as the article it's based on doesn't seem to exist. See the talk page where I also say that Keys isn't the best of sources. Mind you, the recent Inca edit is dodgy, not just the reference but I thought bronze smelting might be older than the Inca. dougweller (talk) 12:03, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Calabraxthis: Difference between revisions Add topic