Revision as of 19:15, 4 January 2009 editCalabraxthis (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers5,400 edits →Alexander Fiske-Harrison: response← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:03, 10 January 2009 edit undoDoug Weller (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Oversighters, Administrators264,417 edits →Bronze Age: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
That's a little harsh, warning a user for blanking a COI page they created about themselves rather than apply db-blank to it. I've reverted it back then tagged it appropriately. --] | ] 18:54, 4 January 2009 (UTC) | That's a little harsh, warning a user for blanking a COI page they created about themselves rather than apply db-blank to it. I've reverted it back then tagged it appropriately. --] | ] 18:54, 4 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
: I agree in part but s/he was messing around creating gratuitous pages and I applied the wrong warning message inadvertently. I see the page has now been deleted anyway.--'''''<span style= "font-size:large;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]</span><sup>]</sup>''''' 19:15, 4 January 2009 (UTC) | : I agree in part but s/he was messing around creating gratuitous pages and I applied the wrong warning message inadvertently. I see the page has now been deleted anyway.--'''''<span style= "font-size:large;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]</span><sup>]</sup>''''' 19:15, 4 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
== ] == | |||
I've removed the Central Asia stuff as the article it's based on doesn't seem to exist. See the talk page where I also say that Keys isn't the best of sources. Mind you, the recent Inca edit is dodgy, not just the reference but I thought bronze smelting might be older than the Inca. ] (]) 12:03, 10 January 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:03, 10 January 2009
Archives |
castletown
can you show me how i went wrong with my edit please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.209.4 (talk) 10:36, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Alexander Fiske-Harrison
That's a little harsh, warning a user for blanking a COI page they created about themselves rather than apply db-blank to it. I've reverted it back then tagged it appropriately. --Blowdart | 18:54, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- I agree in part but s/he was messing around creating gratuitous pages and I applied the wrong warning message inadvertently. I see the page has now been deleted anyway.--Calabraxthis 19:15, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Bronze Age
I've removed the Central Asia stuff as the article it's based on doesn't seem to exist. See the talk page where I also say that Keys isn't the best of sources. Mind you, the recent Inca edit is dodgy, not just the reference but I thought bronze smelting might be older than the Inca. dougweller (talk) 12:03, 10 January 2009 (UTC)