Revision as of 20:50, 31 May 2007 editFuzzform (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,784 edits rated wikipharm← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:16, 16 February 2009 edit undoCaesarjbsquitti (talk | contribs)2,313 edits →North American perspective of Doctors Incomes: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Pharmacology|class=B|importance=Low}} | {{WikiProject Pharmacology|class=B|importance=Low}} | ||
{{WPCHINA|class=start|importance=high}} | {{WPCHINA|class=start|importance=high}} | ||
== North American perspective of Doctors Incomes == | |||
Noted a TV documentary on doctors compensation in China. | |||
The insight was that 'these doctors' considered it a special calling to be a doctor much like a Priest... | |||
They felt being paid was an insult. | |||
So the material on the 'wages' of this article appears to be based on a North American values. | |||
--] ] 19:16, 16 February 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:16, 16 February 2009
Pharmacology B‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
China Start‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||
|
North American perspective of Doctors Incomes
Noted a TV documentary on doctors compensation in China.
The insight was that 'these doctors' considered it a special calling to be a doctor much like a Priest...
They felt being paid was an insult.
So the material on the 'wages' of this article appears to be based on a North American values.
--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 19:16, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Categories: