Misplaced Pages

User talk:70.169.90.252: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:04, 26 February 2009 edit70.169.90.252 (talk) mvmm.b/kh kj .hv jhj: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 17:08, 26 February 2009 edit undo70.169.90.252 (talk) mvmm.b/kh kj .hv jhjNext edit →
Line 14: Line 14:
{{unblock reviewed|because I said So.|decline=Not a compelling reason to unblock, unfortunately. ] <sup> ] </sup>~<small> ] </small> 20:41, 14 August 2008 (UTC)}} {{unblock reviewed|because I said So.|decline=Not a compelling reason to unblock, unfortunately. ] <sup> ] </sup>~<small> ] </small> 20:41, 14 August 2008 (UTC)}}


WOAHHHH. :D
== mvmm.b/kh kj .hv jhj ==

mjbgljfuiobo uyfoytdtxgjzddsryzdhf hgdjtz4wudkv yugbop jgl coyeiwzuasdcvybjogn jhfcirxteufvtiuvb kbuvytocrtxteascyrdtuyvbijo .klhjlgh yidcijhbmkhi...!!!!!!

Revision as of 17:08, 26 February 2009

This IP has been repeatedly blocked from editing Misplaced Pages in response to abuse of editing privileges.
Further abuse from this IP may result in an extended block.
Notify an administratorcontribsblockblock log



Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Misplaced Pages username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 21:46, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

70.169.90.252 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

because I said So.

Decline reason:

Not a compelling reason to unblock, unfortunately. UltraExactZZ ~ Evidence 20:41, 14 August 2008 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

WOAHHHH. :D

Category:
User talk:70.169.90.252: Difference between revisions Add topic