Misplaced Pages

User talk:Ejnogarb: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:43, 2 April 2009 editJayron32 (talk | contribs)105,509 edits Blocked 24 hours: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 02:01, 2 April 2009 edit undoEjnogarb (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users720 edits Blocked 24 hoursNext edit →
Line 30: Line 30:


<div class="user-block"> ] {{#if:1 day|You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 day'''|You have been '''temporarily ]''' from editing}} in accordance with ] for {{#if:You are engaged in an ] at the article ]. When this block expires, please use the talk page instead of editing the article again.|'''You are engaged in an ] at the article ]. When this block expires, please use the talk page instead of editing the article again.'''|]}}. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our ] first. {{#if:].].] 01:43, 2 April 2009 (UTC)|].].] 01:43, 2 April 2009 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block1 --> <div class="user-block"> ] {{#if:1 day|You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 day'''|You have been '''temporarily ]''' from editing}} in accordance with ] for {{#if:You are engaged in an ] at the article ]. When this block expires, please use the talk page instead of editing the article again.|'''You are engaged in an ] at the article ]. When this block expires, please use the talk page instead of editing the article again.'''|]}}. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our ] first. {{#if:].].] 01:43, 2 April 2009 (UTC)|].].] 01:43, 2 April 2009 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block1 -->

{{unblock|I'm sorry for edit warring on the promiscuity page, and acknowledge that I let myself get out of hand in reverting edits. This won't happen again because I'm committed to following a one revert rule, where if someone reverts one of my reverts, I'll back off and use the talk page until a consensus can be reached. As for the article in question, I'm going to leave it alone for a while, and afterwards I won't be making any edits to it until I can reach a consensus with other editors.}} <small><span style="border:1px solid #660000;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 02:01, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:01, 2 April 2009

Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). Also note that this is not a forum for discussing any topic generally. Instead, alert me to the appropriate talk page and I will respond there. As a general rule, I typically delete any messages or warnings that are either old or unimportant. Please don't send me welcome templates, either, because I've already been welcomed.  EJNOGARB 

Talk page guidelines

Please respect etiquette and assume good faith. Also, refrain from making personal attacks and remain civil.

Obama

I have an outline of a lengthy and legitimate article at User:THF/Obama with not a single "nutball conspiracy theory" in it. I'll draft it off-wiki this weekend. I encourage editors to participate in this project by sending me sources (or perhaps fully drafted paragraphs) rather than battling at DRV or on the Talk:Obama page about intermediate stages. If we present a fully-sourced, well-written neutral article, there shouldn't be a problem -- and if there is, it will be pretty damning of Misplaced Pages. THF (talk) 15:46, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Notice

I have brought up your editing at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Agenda/POV pushing. Feel free to weigh in. - ALLST☆R 03:41, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Email

Can you enable your email? CENSEI (talk) 01:23, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Sorry

The whole issue was a miss understanding, my mistake, by the way that was not a welcome, it was a warning, but a wrong one, thank you for removing it :-) sorry again Maen. K. A. (talk) 16:49, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Blocked 24 hours

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 day in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for You are engaged in an edit war at the article Promiscuity. When this block expires, please use the talk page instead of editing the article again.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Jayron32.talk.contribs 01:43, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Ejnogarb (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm sorry for edit warring on the promiscuity page, and acknowledge that I let myself get out of hand in reverting edits. This won't happen again because I'm committed to following a one revert rule, where if someone reverts one of my reverts, I'll back off and use the talk page until a consensus can be reached. As for the article in question, I'm going to leave it alone for a while, and afterwards I won't be making any edits to it until I can reach a consensus with other editors.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I'm sorry for edit warring on the promiscuity page, and acknowledge that I let myself get out of hand in reverting edits. This won't happen again because I'm committed to following a one revert rule, where if someone reverts one of my reverts, I'll back off and use the talk page until a consensus can be reached. As for the article in question, I'm going to leave it alone for a while, and afterwards I won't be making any edits to it until I can reach a consensus with other editors. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I'm sorry for edit warring on the promiscuity page, and acknowledge that I let myself get out of hand in reverting edits. This won't happen again because I'm committed to following a one revert rule, where if someone reverts one of my reverts, I'll back off and use the talk page until a consensus can be reached. As for the article in question, I'm going to leave it alone for a while, and afterwards I won't be making any edits to it until I can reach a consensus with other editors. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I'm sorry for edit warring on the promiscuity page, and acknowledge that I let myself get out of hand in reverting edits. This won't happen again because I'm committed to following a one revert rule, where if someone reverts one of my reverts, I'll back off and use the talk page until a consensus can be reached. As for the article in question, I'm going to leave it alone for a while, and afterwards I won't be making any edits to it until I can reach a consensus with other editors. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

 EJNOGARB  02:01, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Category:
User talk:Ejnogarb: Difference between revisions Add topic