Misplaced Pages

User talk:Bmcworldcitizen: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:23, 22 April 2009 edit9Nak (talk | contribs)3,151 edits Link inclusion on South African general election, 2009← Previous edit Revision as of 18:21, 22 April 2009 edit undoZaian (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers11,844 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:
==]== ==]==
Multiple editors disagree that http://www.worldvoting.net/c/south-africa/ is relevant. That is the established ]. You may also want to see ]. ] (]) 17:23, 22 April 2009 (UTC) Multiple editors disagree that http://www.worldvoting.net/c/south-africa/ is relevant. That is the established ]. You may also want to see ]. ] (]) 17:23, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:South African general election, 2009 |&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 18:21, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:21, 22 April 2009

November 2008

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page World government has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Misplaced Pages. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Misplaced Pages. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\byoutube\.com' (link(s): http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=D477A2B2D899F0D0) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image or a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Misplaced Pages's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Misplaced Pages's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 10:32, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

South African general election, 2009

Multiple editors disagree that http://www.worldvoting.net/c/south-africa/ is relevant. That is the established consensus. You may also want to see WP:3RR. 9Nak (talk) 17:23, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on South African general election, 2009 . Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Zaian (talk) 18:21, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Bmcworldcitizen: Difference between revisions Add topic