| Revision as of 04:45, 29 April 2009 editKirill Lokshin (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users75,365 edits →Re: User missing in West Bank proposed decision: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:22, 29 April 2009 edit undoGRBerry (talk | contribs)16,708 edits →Re: User missing in West Bank proposed decision: makes senseNext edit → | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
| Well, the injunction was put in place because he was being disruptive on the case pages themselves, not because of anything related to the original dispute. Given that he was not a party to the case, I'm hesitant to introduce findings about him at this late stage. ] <sup>]] ]]</sup> 04:45, 29 April 2009 (UTC) | Well, the injunction was put in place because he was being disruptive on the case pages themselves, not because of anything related to the original dispute. Given that he was not a party to the case, I'm hesitant to introduce findings about him at this late stage. ] <sup>]] ]]</sup> 04:45, 29 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :That makes sense. ] 13:22, 29 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:22, 29 April 2009
Template:WPChristianity sidebar • {{ChristianityWikiProject}} • Category:Unassessed-Class Christianity articles
Christianity Recognized Content • AFD results by nominator
I am also user GRBerry on Commons, Wikispecies, Meta, and (although I speak no German) de.Misplaced Pages. Messages intended for me on any of those projects may be left here, in which case I ask the poster to indicate which project they are talking about. GRBerry diffmeta diff I've also signed up for single user login.
| This talk page is automatically archived by User:MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 31 days are automatically archived to User talk:GRBerry/Archive 11. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
Email advice: When able to be active on Misplaced Pages, I am more likely to read this talk page than I am to read email, as the email goes to my work email. So please reserve email for items requiring 1) confidentiality, 2) the format (forwarding other emails), or 3) some other really good reason for using email. Also, to help it get through my spam filters and to my attention, have the email subject line begin with "Misplaced Pages". If at all possible, I will respond on Misplaced Pages, because I believe that transparency is important, and each user I email lessens my privacy. GRBerry
- Archive 1: April 20 to June 26, 2006
- Archive 2: June 27 to September 10, 2006
- Archive 3: September 11 to December 30, 2006
At this point I became an admin. Subsequent archives are by bot in the order conversations became stale rather than the order they were created.
- Archive 4: December 31, 2006 to January 27, 2007
- Archive 5: January 31, 2007 to May 31, 2007
- Archive 6: June 1, 2007 to September 1, 2007
- Archive 7: September 2, 2007 to October 29, 2007
- Archive 8: October 30, 2007 to December 31, 2007
- Archive 9: January 1, 2008 to March 31, 2008
- Archive 10: April 1, 2008 to August 31, 2008
- Archive 11: September 1, 2008 to ongoing
- New sections belong at the bottom, not here.
The word consensus
Hey, I'm sorta discussing the word consensus at MastCell's talkpage and picked out your comment that the 60% against autopromotion was "clear consensus". I'm letting you know so you can defend your interpretation of the word if you want. Hope you don't take it personally, although I do think the word should not be used improperly. II | (t - c) 07:05, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Re: User missing in West Bank proposed decision
Well, the injunction was put in place because he was being disruptive on the case pages themselves, not because of anything related to the original dispute. Given that he was not a party to the case, I'm hesitant to introduce findings about him at this late stage. Kirill 04:45, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- That makes sense. GRBerry 13:22, 29 April 2009 (UTC)