| Revision as of 12:57, 23 November 2005 editとある白い猫 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,796 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:16, 24 November 2005 edit undoDavenbelle (talk | contribs)3,206 edits expand, not mergeNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Merge== | ==Merge== | ||
| the ''Ilısu Dam Campaign'' is nothing but a group that aims to prevent the construction of the Ilısu Dam, it will expand the ''Ilısu Dam'' article however anyone reading this without reading about the dam itself will be at best confused, a large number of statements here only is a duplicate of the ] page. Hence a merge is only logical --<small>]<sup>]|]</sup></small> 12:50, 23 November 2005 (UTC) | the ''Ilısu Dam Campaign'' is nothing but a group that aims to prevent the construction of the Ilısu Dam, it will expand the ''Ilısu Dam'' article however anyone reading this without reading about the dam itself will be at best confused, a large number of statements here only is a duplicate of the ] page. Hence a merge is only logical --<small>]<sup>]|]</sup></small> 12:50, 23 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
| First-off, is not a revert. Secondly, a link to ] is offered in the first sentence and readers are free to view that article, too. These articles should be expanded, not merged. You have a ] (]), so you should tread carefully on subjects you have been found to be biased on. — ] 03:16, 24 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:16, 24 November 2005
Merge
the Ilısu Dam Campaign is nothing but a group that aims to prevent the construction of the Ilısu Dam, it will expand the Ilısu Dam article however anyone reading this without reading about the dam itself will be at best confused, a large number of statements here only is a duplicate of the Ilısu Dam page. Hence a merge is only logical --Cool Cat 12:50, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
First-off, this is not a revert. Secondly, a link to Ilısu Dam is offered in the first sentence and readers are free to view that article, too. These articles should be expanded, not merged. You have a History of POV editing (see also), so you should tread carefully on subjects you have been found to be biased on. — Davenbelle 03:16, 24 November 2005 (UTC)