Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Sergio D. Acosta: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:40, 24 May 2009 editVarbas (talk | contribs)442 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 00:24, 25 May 2009 edit undoMichaelQSchmidt (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users60,150 edits →Sergio D. Acosta: KEEPNext edit →
Line 15: Line 15:
*'''Delete''' blps without any reliable sources that discuss the subject of the blp in any depth, the sort of things that might establish notability and allow for verification of claims made, are generally a minimum standards for biographical articles in this encyclopedia. And there are none.] (]) 20:28, 22 May 2009 (UTC) *'''Delete''' blps without any reliable sources that discuss the subject of the blp in any depth, the sort of things that might establish notability and allow for verification of claims made, are generally a minimum standards for biographical articles in this encyclopedia. And there are none.] (]) 20:28, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- <tt>]</tt> (]) 18:25, 24 May 2009 (UTC)</small> *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- <tt>]</tt> (]) 18:25, 24 May 2009 (UTC)</small>
*'''STRONG Keep''' per a cursory search per ] shows the subject as meeting inclusion criteria of ] through coverage in reliable sources, and (even easier) his film projects receiving awards. ''']''' '']'' 00:24, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

*'''NOTE''': Though IMDB is not accepted as "proof" of notability, it is NOT edited by the public. That's Misplaced Pages. IMDB does accept user submissions, including submissions from industry experts, but all such submissions, including those from their own editorial staff, are vetted before IMDB publishes. Though not accepted as a reliable, Misplaced Pages does encourage using IMDB as a starting point in conducting further research. ''']''' '']'' 22:21, 24 May 2009 (UTC) *'''Comment''': Though IMDB is not accepted as "proof" of notability, it is NOT edited by the public. That's Misplaced Pages. IMDB does accept user submissions, including submissions from industry experts, but all such submissions, including those from their own editorial staff, are vetted before IMDB publishes. Though not accepted as a reliable, Misplaced Pages does encourage using IMDB as a starting point in conducting further research. ''']''' '']'' 22:21, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
'''Note to closer''': The article has gone through significant ] per ] since it was nominated. ''']''' '']'' 00:24, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:24, 25 May 2009

Sergio D. Acosta

Sergio D. Acosta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Essentially unsourced BLP (IMDB is only semi-independent source/link given, and as that can be edited by the public it is unreliable). Awards allegedly received sound trivial in the extreme. Filmography is a bunch of films without articles. Even if everything in article is true the person sounds like he fails our notability standards by a wide margin. DreamGuy (talk) 15:03, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Are there reliable sources for that? If you can provide them, great. DreamGuy (talk) 15:15, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Well, you'll need reliable sources to demonstrate that those films actually won awards. IMDB is not a reliable source for such matters, as the filmmaker himself could have added it. Please find sources that meet our rules. DreamGuy (talk) 15:15, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Removing references from an article does not mean that references do not exist. I easily located additional reliable references (just as you would have if you cared to look) confirming that his films "Runaways" and "Exploring Love" did indeed win such awards , and I also found a further independent article on Sergio D. Acosta here. Varbas (talk) 22:39, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete blps without any reliable sources that discuss the subject of the blp in any depth, the sort of things that might establish notability and allow for verification of claims made, are generally a minimum standards for biographical articles in this encyclopedia. And there are none.Bali ultimate (talk) 20:28, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- decltype (talk) 18:25, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
  • STRONG Keep per a cursory search per WP:AFTER shows the subject as meeting inclusion criteria of WP:GNG through coverage in reliable sources, and (even easier) his film projects receiving awards. Schmidt, 00:24, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment: Though IMDB is not accepted as "proof" of notability, it is NOT edited by the public. That's Misplaced Pages. IMDB does accept user submissions, including submissions from industry experts, but all such submissions, including those from their own editorial staff, are vetted before IMDB publishes. Though not accepted as a reliable, Misplaced Pages does encourage using IMDB as a starting point in conducting further research. Schmidt, 22:21, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Note to closer: The article has gone through significant WP:CLEANUP per WP:AFTER since it was nominated. Schmidt, 00:24, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Categories:
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Sergio D. Acosta: Difference between revisions Add topic