Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 20:28, 28 May 2009

Archives

/Archive 1

FYI...

Regarding : When you remove the Google hits plus the example, the statement about cyberculture of course looks like OR. If you think it can be better done, do it. (see: {{sofixit}}) BTW: Do you only come here to terrorize Buckethead articles? What has he done to you? --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord 05:46, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Partialy adressed at the articles talk page. I'm not fixing it because it is clearly original research. Claiming the song is an integral part of cyberculture is a huge leap from what the sources say and is something I simply do not believe. I did not come here to terrorize Buckethead articles. I'm just trying to fix Buckethead related content. Articles that do not belong, make false claims and are made up primarily of original research do not help. Maybe you should have another look at wp:v and wp:nor. Duffbeerforme (talk) 16:40, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

It's kinda strange that nobody else is seeing that. And the article has had lots of hits the last few days. Really strange. I might award you a barnstar for your tireless attempts in removing content from Misplaced Pages. Or annoying people, or whatever. The "integral" might be a bit nasty, yes. I removed it until I've made a deeper research through some of the hundred thousands of Ghits.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord 17:07, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Maybe you should have another look at wp:v and wp:nor and try to avoid making personal attacks . Duffbeerforme (talk) 17:19, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh, it is a personal attack to have a different opinion - ok... That closes every discussion... --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord 17:20, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

The suggestion that i am only here to anoy uyou is a personal atack Duffbeerforme (talk)

The pages about HURT (band)

• Happy_slapping
• Fuck
• Question
• Breadcrumb
• Reading_(process)
• Misplaced Pages

Are you saying that these pages above are more notable than a band that has been heavily researched???

We've had this discussion with someone else; JUST BECAUSE THE INFORMATION ORIGINATED FROM A FORUM DOESN'T MEANT THAT IT'S NOT RELIABLE! Have you checked the links yourself? Most of the info we get has been through interviews conducted by other sites, that had the same feelings as you, that the band wasn't notable enough. As such, we've archived the interviews to the forum.

Also, deleting the pages, Hurt (Self-Titled) and The Consumation is a major point in this discussion. Those pages were based off of an interview that one person conducted. He had no other place to put it except the forum, this way it could be cited for the specific use of being on Misplaced Pages.

I hope that you take the time to reflect on what you delete from now on, because face value of a link isn't quite enough.— Preceding unsigned comment added by EOA3928 (talk • contribs) 17:51, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

What is a reliable source is something defined at the link provided. I don't know if those other article are more or less notable but that does not matter, see Misplaced Pages:Other stuff exists. A superficial look at the first, Happy slapping shows very many independant sources. Do you really think that Fuck is less notable? Seriously? Such a question says a lot about your credability. Duffbeerforme (talk) 18:10, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

It doesn't matter how notable it is. The point is that is some of those pages are useless, and make this site look like a joke. Do we need a page about the process of Reading? No. Because if someone doesn't know how to read, then they won't be reading it. Besides, you're reading while reading about reading. We don't need that article. But they're there, despite how useless they are. What makes breadcrumbs more notable than a band with a history? —Preceding unsigned comment added by EOA3928 (talk • contribs) 18:22, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

It does matter how notable it is, see WP:N. How notable is reading? If you really don't know then look at the Bibliography, the Further reading and the external links. The article on breadcrumbs is a poor article. That said find me a good number of people who honestly don't kow what breadcrumbs are and who do know who HURT are and I will withdraw my position. Duffbeerforme (talk) 18:37, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Once again, you're not reading the citations. December EP links came from the bands official website. Not notable enough? Apparently the band's information FROM THEM isn't good enough. You're vandalizing now, and trying to get back at me won't make you feel any better. EOA3928 (talk) 18:51, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

The bands official site is not independant of the band. Please don't make false accusations. Duffbeerforme (talk) 18:56, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

For anyone reading this, this admin has determined that this level-4 warning is baseless and unwarranted. Toddst1 (talk) 01:04, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

AN/I

Have a look at this discussion. --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord 21:19, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD edit

Please be more careful when adding articles for deletion to the listing page. this edit managed to transclude the entire AfD info page onto the listing page, because you entered an incorrect file path with as part of it. --Terrillja _talk 23:09, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, stuffed up there. I shall try to be more careful. Duffbeerforme (talk) 05:34, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Archiving

Please consider archiving this page. It's a pain to scroll all the way up and down.Toddst1 (talk) 00:56, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

done Duffbeerforme (talk) 05:34, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Chase Meridian merge

Hello, there is a proposal to merge an article you recently discussed here. Ryan4314 (talk) 22:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

DeSoL

They did indeed chart on Billboard, see here. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • 01:54, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Jake Spencer

Removed the cat Indigenous. Not cited reference and seems unlikely from his photos. ROxBo (talk) 13:15, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Yes, that was a mistake, I misread a reference Duffbeerforme (talk) 14:04, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Re Your edit to Lisa Moore

I have reinsert original mention of unplanned pregnancy and added a reference to address your comment about a unsourced assertion. BTW the article referenced is a link on Lisa's own website. Try Google the article name. Hoping this sort things out Chrisfromcanberra (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:27, 28 April 2009 (UTC).

The Majority

You're welcome. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 15:55, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/David J Williams.

Please do not add nonsense edits unclear comments to AfDs as you did at and the last part of . -- Jeandré, 2009-05-17t22:51z, -- Jeandré, 2009-05-28t20:28z

It's better to plainly say what you mean - discussions on improving an encyclopedia vs the tone on most messageboards. Sockpuppets shouldn't matter: 200 useless keeps should be ignored by the closing admin if there's one good delete reason given. -- Jeandré, 2009-05-28t20:28z

Craig L. Russell

Another editor removed the {{prod}} template from Craig L. Russell, asserting (but not demonstrating) notability. Bongomatic 04:48, 25 May 2009 (UTC) Should you wish to reply, please do so here. I will watch this page for a few days, so no {{talkback}} or other comment on my talk page is required.

Thank you for that notice. The article is now at AFD, Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Craig L. Russell (software architect). Duffbeerforme (talk) 16:02, 28 May 2009 (UTC)