Revision as of 15:11, 24 June 2009 editAnmaFinotera (talk | contribs)107,494 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Naga the Serpent. using TW← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:15, 24 June 2009 edit undoOstateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk | contribs)2,247 edits →June 2009Next edit → | ||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
== June 2009 == | == June 2009 == | ||
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Naga the Serpent|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> -- ] (] '''·''' ]) 15:11, 24 June 2009 (UTC) | ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Naga the Serpent|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> -- ] (] '''·''' ]) 15:11, 24 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
oh geez, come on. Do we need a drama? --] (]) 15:15, 24 June 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:15, 24 June 2009
Welcome
|
Leo John
You have not given a valid speedy delete reason for this article. Criteria for speedy deletion are given at WP:CSD and your reasoning does not meet any of the criteria hence the article is not suitable for speedy deletion. Additionally according to WP:DP#Speedy deletion speedy deletion tags should not normally be re-added once another editor (who isn't the page creator) has removed them. If you want this page deleted you should use the WP:PROD or WP:AfD processes. Dpmuk (talk) 15:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Come on, a minor character in one film, presented as a real person? --Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk) 15:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- I'll add that I'm not fundementally against this page being deleted - I haven't investiagted it enough to form an opinion on whether we should have an article or not. However I am against the article being speedied as a) it doesn't meet any of the criteria and b) I believe there should be more discussion than would occur with a speedy deletion. Dpmuk (talk) 15:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Naga the serpent
Please see the talk page for this article, I believe it should accurately convey the reasons behind the edits, and the justification of them using official[REDACTED] policy. The removal of the content is in order to improve the pages many issues, it's a awful example of a character article Dandy Sephy (talk) 14:44, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
June 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Naga the Serpent. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 15:11, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
oh geez, come on. Do we need a drama? --Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk) 15:15, 24 June 2009 (UTC)