Misplaced Pages

Talk:List of WWE personnel: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:15, 7 November 2005 editMoe Epsilon (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers119,292 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 00:26, 2 December 2005 edit undoWwfanz (talk | contribs)1,357 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 32: Line 32:


All the people listed here do have developmental contracts, there's no reason to seperate them. ] ]] 23:15, 7 November 2005 (UTC) All the people listed here do have developmental contracts, there's no reason to seperate them. ] ]] 23:15, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

==WWE Superstars sent to OVW & DSW==
Shouldn't the Raw and SmackDown Superstars that were sent to OVW and DSW be on those lists and not the "inactive roster" list? I don't see how they are "inactive". --] 00:26, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:26, 2 December 2005

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of WWE personnel article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
WikiProject iconProfessional wrestling Unassessed
WikiProject iconList of WWE personnel is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

"Red links"

I'd previously removed some of the wikilinks to articles that don't exist. While red links may encourage articles to be written, the thing is, just because someone works for WWE in some capacity doesn't mean we want to encourage articles to be written about that person. --Jtalledo (talk) 23:11, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

Two Comments about WWE Current Superstar Page I Have

I suggest instead of putting Jim Ross under Inactive, should not he be under the administration with the title: Executive Vice President, Business Strategies with a mention to his firing in kayfabe?

Furthermore, Would it be more logic to list the Commentators, Backstage Announcers, Ring Announcers, & GM under there specific Brand or would it be to messy --BionicWilliam 18:56, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

There aren't too many Commenators and such so leaving them with their own sections is better than splitting them up into brands. --Jtalledo (talk) 19:10, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

Then aleast we should put what brand there affilated with. My reasoning is say a noobie to wrestling came on here and wanted to know who the GM's it would look like that both Bischoff & Long were Co GMs? BionicWilliam 19:46, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

I marked up some of the commentators and such with their respective brands. Good idea. --Jtalledo (talk) 23:07, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

Alphabetizing issues

I see that wrestlers with normal names are alphabetized by last name but people like Super Crazy are as well. For wrestlers like Super Crazy and Super Porky, wouldn't it make more sense to just use the first letter of their name since it's not like we are supposed to believe that Mr. and Mrs. Crazy had a little boy and decided to call him "Super." --Darren Jowalsen 22:14, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

True. These kinds of entries should be alphabetized by the first letters of their stage names. --Jtalledo (talk) 22:47, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

I suggest we all the workers in order by the first letter of there stage name as on WWE’s Superstar page but not by articals like for example: Undertaker besides The Undetaker, Rock besides the Rock That would get rid of part-time wrestlers and managers/divas but it would also stop reverting wars that has been going on. BionicWilliam 19:49, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

The current alphabetical order listing is fine; no reason to change it. SWD316 23:15, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

About OVW & DSW Roster’s in general

I would suggest we should split their rosters up into development and the exclusive rosters. Seeing as it is hard to believe every one of those stars under those lists are under WWE Superstar or WWE Developmental Superstar Contracts. BionicWilliam 19:49, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

All the people listed here do have developmental contracts, there's no reason to seperate them. SWD316 23:15, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

WWE Superstars sent to OVW & DSW

Shouldn't the Raw and SmackDown Superstars that were sent to OVW and DSW be on those lists and not the "inactive roster" list? I don't see how they are "inactive". --Wwfanz 00:26, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

Categories:
Talk:List of WWE personnel: Difference between revisions Add topic