Misplaced Pages

User talk:Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:32, 29 June 2009 editPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers286,447 edits Polite Suggestion← Previous edit Revision as of 13:17, 30 June 2009 edit undoLaVidaLoca (talk | contribs)1,189 edits Jonestown: new sectionNext edit →
Line 162: Line 162:
== Template:The Holocaust and ghettos == == Template:The Holocaust and ghettos ==
Perhaps you'd like to comment at ]. --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 17:32, 29 June 2009 (UTC) Perhaps you'd like to comment at ]. --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 17:32, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

== ] ==

Please do not continue to make changes that do not conform to ] style guidelines, layout and image use placement rationale. The reasons for the reversion were given quite clearly in the previous edit summary.
1. The ''Time'' magazine cover image is placed next to article content which actually discusses the cover, which is required per the rationale for a non-free use image. When you shove it into what you think is a large space on the article directly under the infobox, it disrupts the alignment of the entire article for those editors who keep the table of contents closed or have settings and style that do not display it.
2. You were asked to discuss category changes on talk page and allow a consensus to form regarding what changes should be made by editors. You added categories that are redundant to one another and removed ones that are correct. Jonestown was an intentional community, yet you removed that category. There is contention over the use of the word cult, thus the cult category, Jonestown was a place where people live, the "in places of worship" is incorrect.

Your edit summaries were incivil and could quickly get you blocked for violating user behavior guidelines. The proper conduct is to make a talk page posting to discuss your issues and discuss it. ] says it fine to be bold, but once you've been reverted, discussion should ensue. Finally, you are dangerously close to violating ] for the two articles combined. That will lead to a block. Please discuss any changes you want to make on the talk page prior to making them. ] (]) 13:17, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

==Username==
I have concerns with your username, which is also the name for an album by ]. Such a name could be considered as promotional in nature. You should consider changing it before it is reported as a username violation. ] (]) 13:17, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:17, 30 June 2009

Welcome

Hello, Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Misplaced Pages. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Misplaced Pages you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! DocteurCosmos (talk) 12:22, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Leo John

You have not given a valid speedy delete reason for this article. Criteria for speedy deletion are given at WP:CSD and your reasoning does not meet any of the criteria hence the article is not suitable for speedy deletion. Additionally according to WP:DP#Speedy deletion speedy deletion tags should not normally be re-added once another editor (who isn't the page creator) has removed them. If you want this page deleted you should use the WP:PROD or WP:AfD processes. Dpmuk (talk) 15:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Come on, a minor character in one film, presented as a real person? --Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk) 15:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

I'll add that I'm not fundementally against this page being deleted - I haven't investiagted it enough to form an opinion on whether we should have an article or not. However I am against the article being speedied as a) it doesn't meet any of the criteria and b) I believe there should be more discussion than would occur with a speedy deletion. Dpmuk (talk) 15:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Naga the serpent

Please see the talk page for this article, I believe it should accurately convey the reasons behind the edits, and the justification of them using official[REDACTED] policy. The removal of the content is in order to improve the pages many issues, it's a awful example of a character article Dandy Sephy (talk) 14:44, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

June 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Naga the Serpent. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 15:11, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

oh geez, come on. Do we need a drama? --Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk) 15:15, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

I'd suggest you check the attitude and read up on WP:CIVIL as well as WP:EDITWAR before you get yourself blocked. Your actions at Naga the Serpent are inappropriate and you are edit warring. Discuss it on the talk page, but frankly you have no leg to stand on. You cannot just say "go watch the episode" or whatever to back up claims interpreting the motivations/thoughts, etc of characters. The original work can only source actual plot summary, not attempts to decide what something means, and especially that nama=naga if it is not explicitly said in the series. That is WP:OR as has already been pointed out to you on the talk page. You need reliable, third party-sources to back up the claims you are making. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 15:20, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
NO U are edit warring. Tell me what's your problem and I'll give you a screenshot or whatever you need. That's the First Party-Sources. Or maybe define the other "reliable sources" in this case. Oh, and I didn't even write this stuff (only just cleaned up), but it's simply true. Stuff cen be rewritten (I do this!), but you come and delete everything, even such stuff like there are clones or the Shadow Copy Naga has very different character. But for what exactly reason? --Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk) 15:22, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Please stop linking to illegal content. You are violating Misplaced Pages's WP:COPYRIGHT policies. And screenshots are not sources. You are the only one edit warring here. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 16:17, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
"Am" (was) I edit warring with myself? Are you me? YT is "illegal" now? --Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk) 16:21, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Game Over (video game)

Hi Ostateczny - would you consider using the talk page to write clearly about how you think the article can be improved? Rather than just posting a photo only indirectly related to the subject. You are expected to discuss articles with objectivity and civility. Looking at your comments above, I also suggest you review WP:CIVIL. Thanks, Marasmusine (talk) 15:58, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Nipples being suddenly evil, even on talk page? Geez, guys. --Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk) 16:02, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for removing the image. Marasmusine (talk) 16:09, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

You just floored me. This image illustrates nipple, you know. --Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk) 16:10, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure that you understand. That it was a nipple is irrelevant. I asked you to remove the photo because it was not directly related to the talk page's subject. If you have comments about the game's cover artwork, say so objectively and concisely with words. Marasmusine (talk) 16:21, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Well, the article discusses the nipple pic while not showing nipple (picture censored, cropped by uploader). While[REDACTED] shows nipples (not only there, a lot of nipples and even vaginas and penises and all that). --Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk) 16:33, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Re:You're doing it wrong

I have no idea what you're referring to. Link? Axem Titanium (talk)

You removed them from X-com games category, which is under cat Category:Science fiction video games. Also wtf are you doing? --Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk) 19:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Just doing some general cleanup. The categories had too few articles so I made a WP:BOLD move to upmerge them into the main Category:X-COM. Axem Titanium (talk) 19:07, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

So don't do this like a robot and think. --Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk) 19:08, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry but I don't appreciate being called a robot. Please try to be WP:CIVIL. I notice you're pretty new to Misplaced Pages so I'll let you off the hook this time. At any rate, what reasoning do you have for retaining the category? The main X-COM category has only 9 articles, so there's hardly a need to make a separate category for just 8 other highly related articles. Combining them to leave 17 articles in the main X-COM category would make it much more robust. The X-COM games category was also created without discussion by a banned user, just a few days ago. Axem Titanium (talk) 22:20, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
I see that you've made edits since my last message. Care to respond? Cheers, Axem Titanium (talk) 02:56, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Oh geez. I don't really care that much about this... --Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk) 08:45, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Then you don't mind if I re-merge the categories? Axem Titanium (talk) 23:16, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
I'd prefer it to remain. --Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk) 23:18, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
So you refuse to discuss the issue and respond to the reasons for merging that I posed. Instead, you are going to staunchly remain in your current position, without giving any reason why it should be this way, on an issue that you "don't really care" about. Is my assessment of the situation correct? Axem Titanium (talk) 00:19, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Uh, what's your reasoning to delete this? "only 9 articles"? Many others have actually less. (not that there will be more anytime soon or ever now) --Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk) 00:24, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS. Other categories are probably not sufficiently large in scope to be useful. I will address those as I find them. Axem Titanium (talk) 00:46, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
I am going to take your continued lack of rebuttal as evidence that you don't have one. Cheers, Axem Titanium (talk) 13:55, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
I have repeatedly asked you to provide justification for why the categories shouldn't be merged and you have failed to do so. Please revert your recent changes instead of edit warring. Axem Titanium (talk) 14:10, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Dude, wtf? DON'T ASK ME, NOMINATE. Also, you ONCE AGAIN didn't move the "s-f games" category. What's up with you, seriosuly? --Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk) 14:12, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

External links

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Mochizuki Chiyome has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Misplaced Pages. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Misplaced Pages. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bwikia\.com\b (links: http://dynastywarriors.wikia.com/main_page).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Misplaced Pages's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:14, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Civility

HI Ostateczny, I've noticed that you are still making incivil comments () despite my asking you to read WP:CIVIL. I would not like to see this lead to a block, because I can see you are also making many good edits to articles. Something you may find helpful when cleaning up <ref>'s are the various {{cite}} templates; for example Template:Cite web, Template:Cite journal, etc. Marasmusine (talk) 12:27, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Yamanni-ryū

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Yamanni-ryū, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://budopedia.net/index.php?title=Yamanni_ryu. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:14, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Christ, I only moved the article, I don't care. --Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk) 14:15, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. It appears that you recently tried to give Yamanni ryu a different title by copying its content and pasting it into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Misplaced Pages has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Misplaced Pages:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 15:04, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't see any ""Move" tab at the top of the page". --Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk) 15:24, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Its sitting at the top of ever page unless you are using an odd skin. Regardless, you now know you do NOT try to "move" an article by copy/pasting it, nor should you be trying to move an article without discussing it first when you don't even know how to move one. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:32, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

3 things

Hi, I came across your move request at Talk:Boryaku. However, since a) it was formatted incorrectly and b) no reason was given, I've removed it. If you'd like to repost the request, that's fine, but please read Misplaced Pages:Requested moves#Requesting_potentially_controversial_moves first, so the bot that processes these requests can parse it properly.

Also, I noticed that your very first contribution here was an attempt to move Murat Gasayev to Murat Gasaev. Unfortunately, what you did was simply cut the text from the first article and copy it to the second. I see that you've already been cautioned about this above, but please read Help:Moving a page before making any further moves. Doing this means that the page history doesn't move with the article, which is required for reasons of copyright and attribution under the licenses which Misplaced Pages operates under (GFDL and CC-BY-SA).

Third, slow down! :) Browsing through your contributions, I can see that you've been editing almost continuously for three days straight, only breaking for sleep. While I also have had my share of editing binges, for your health, I recommend taking a few hours off each day to do something else. As they say in finance "Diversify, diversify, diversify!" Don't get so focused on Misplaced Pages that you forget the rest of your life. That said, it is your life, and I highly appreciate your dedication here.

Happy editing, and welcome! --Aervanath (talk) 04:55, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for caring :) --Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk) 20:50, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Polite Suggestion

Hey , I noticed you created a page with an edit summary of in progress, perhaps you are unaware but there is a template that is made for that purpose.

page is in the middle of an expansion or major revampingThis user talk page or section is in a state of significant expansion or restructuring. You are welcome to assist in its construction by editing it as well. If this user talk page has not been edited in several days, please remove this template.
If you are the editor who added this template and you are actively editing, please be sure to replace this template with {{in use}} during the active editing session. Click on the link for template parameters to use. This page was last edited by LaVidaLoca (talk | contribs) 15 years ago. (Update timer)

without the spaces. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 13:55, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. --Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk) 13:56, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Template:The Holocaust and ghettos

Perhaps you'd like to comment at Template_talk:The_Holocaust#Inclusion_criteria_for_ghettos. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 17:32, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Jonestown

Please do not continue to make changes that do not conform to WP:MOS style guidelines, layout and image use placement rationale. The reasons for the reversion were given quite clearly in the previous edit summary. 1. The Time magazine cover image is placed next to article content which actually discusses the cover, which is required per the rationale for a non-free use image. When you shove it into what you think is a large space on the article directly under the infobox, it disrupts the alignment of the entire article for those editors who keep the table of contents closed or have settings and style that do not display it. 2. You were asked to discuss category changes on talk page and allow a consensus to form regarding what changes should be made by editors. You added categories that are redundant to one another and removed ones that are correct. Jonestown was an intentional community, yet you removed that category. There is contention over the use of the word cult, thus the cult category, Jonestown was a place where people live, the "in places of worship" is incorrect.

Your edit summaries were incivil and could quickly get you blocked for violating user behavior guidelines. The proper conduct is to make a talk page posting to discuss your issues and discuss it. WP:BRD says it fine to be bold, but once you've been reverted, discussion should ensue. Finally, you are dangerously close to violating WP:3RR for the two articles combined. That will lead to a block. Please discuss any changes you want to make on the talk page prior to making them. LaVidaLoca (talk) 13:17, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Username

I have concerns with your username, which is also the name for an album by Kult. Such a name could be considered as promotional in nature. You should consider changing it before it is reported as a username violation. LaVidaLoca (talk) 13:17, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji: Difference between revisions Add topic