Revision as of 00:00, 19 July 2009 editRon Ritzman (talk | contribs)75,721 edits Relisting debate← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:25, 19 July 2009 edit undoRon Ritzman (talk | contribs)75,721 edits Closing debate, result was keepNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
<!--Template:Afd top | |||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
The result was '''keep'''. If anybody besides the nominator disagrees with this close feel free to revert. (]) ] (]) 00:25, 19 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
===]=== | ===]=== | ||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}} | |||
<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Center for Range Voting}}</ul></div> | <div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Center for Range Voting}}</ul></div> | ||
:{{la|Center for Range Voting}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|Center for Range Voting}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
Line 11: | Line 17: | ||
<hr style="width:50%;" /> | <hr style="width:50%;" /> | ||
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] (]) 00:00, 19 July 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Center for Range Voting (2nd nomination)|]|}} | :<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] (]) 00:00, 19 July 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Center for Range Voting (2nd nomination)|]|}} | ||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
Revision as of 00:25, 19 July 2009
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. If anybody besides the nominator disagrees with this close feel free to revert. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:25, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Center for Range Voting
AfDs for this article:- Center for Range Voting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete. non-notable per this debate. Cordyceps2009 (talk) 21:43, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. nomination by single-purpose account, registered and immediately filed, only edits are this nomination. The discussion cited was in 2006, the sources in the present article were not available then. The nominator then was also an SPA, Yellowbeard dedicated to AfDing topics related to Range voting, subsequently indef blocked for disruption. I'll file a sock report, new editors don't ordinarily immediately dive into AfD process. --Abd (talk) 01:23, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 02:47, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Merge to range voting. Insufficient notability for stand-alone article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:31, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I have no problem with a merge, given how little information there is in the article, but that's an ordinary editorial decision, it doesn't require an AfD. With a merge, if more RS appears, the article can easily be brought back, it's far better than a deletion, and far more useful to readers, since, if they look up the Center, they will find the information. If it were deleted, they would get nothing. We can't merge while it's under AfD, so .... --Abd (talk) 12:18, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 19 July 2009 (UTC) - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.