| Revision as of 15:02, 27 August 2009 editDeepak D'Souza (talk | contribs)6,451 edits →Re: Help: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:02, 12 September 2009 edit undo虞海 (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers5,873 edits →Re: HelpNext edit → | ||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
| Hi Sandeep , good that you are learning by wathcing me. Like they say: Fools learn from their mistakes; wise men learn from the mistakes of others :-). Unfortunately, I am not a very good copyeditor. I make a lot of typos and grammar mistakes. Actually Im too lazy to do it and mostly it is other editors who clean up my mistakes. I will look at the ] article soon. If you need guidlines on copyediting you can read ] and ]. --] 15:02, 27 August 2009 (UTC) | Hi Sandeep , good that you are learning by wathcing me. Like they say: Fools learn from their mistakes; wise men learn from the mistakes of others :-). Unfortunately, I am not a very good copyeditor. I make a lot of typos and grammar mistakes. Actually Im too lazy to do it and mostly it is other editors who clean up my mistakes. I will look at the ] article soon. If you need guidlines on copyediting you can read ] and ]. --] 15:02, 27 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ==Edits of Page India== | |||
| * See what you did on Page Medog: --] (]) 08:02, 12 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:02, 12 September 2009
Your edits on India
Hi Sandeepsp4u, Welcome to Misplaced Pages. I understand that you may be a bit upset that I reverted your edits to India. Please don't take it personally. Being a new user, I owe you an explanation . I was a bit busy so I could not put this post immediately. My apologies.
As you may have gone through the Welcome message above, Misplaced Pages works on some prinicples, one of them being Achieve Consensus. Editors on Misplaced Pages often disagree on the content , (such as in our case :-)). Dissucion and providing suitable references is the way out.
This is especially true in case of important articles like India which is a featured article. See the star on the top right hand side. That signifies that this is an excellent article which has been achieved through a lot of efforts and we must keep up this level of quality. This does not mean that we don't edit the article at all!
Given that a large number of users would like to edit this article there are bound to be disagreements. So the general procedure on such important articles is that editors first discuss major changes on the article's talk page. See Talk:India. This is the discussion page for the article India. Just take a look at it and you will get an idea of the amount of discussions that take place!
Of course you need not discuss everthing on every article. Small changes such as spelling corrections etc can be done without prior discussions. Also, if you are working on an article on which there are few or no other editors you can avoid discussing all edits. However if there is a disagreement it is best to discuss before making any further edits. Feel free to discuss any changes you want to make to the India article on the talk page.
Secondly let me explain why I mentioned personal opinions and prefereces in my summary. I was concered with this edit . Your edit summary did seem to me like a personal opinion. Misplaced Pages. That is why I commented as such. If you feel that it is a valid point we can discuss it further on the article talk page.
Regards --Deepak D'Souza 10:04, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Estonia–India relations
Can you help find references for Estonia–India relations? --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 17:00, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
RSS
I had uploaded the pics without verifying the copy right. Thanks for point out to me and correcting them. Also, I have changed the two references that you pointed out as dubious. I have included references from Frontline for the same now.
Btw, I did not get why you called one of my edits as vandalism. It was indeed a valid fact quoted from reliable sources. I had provided the citations as well. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anupkc (talk • contribs) 11:48, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
I agree with your references. --Anupkc (talk) 08:32, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Dear Sandeep, this is the last paragraph in Britannia's article on Hanuman
Hanuman is also a popular deity in Tibet, Southeast Asia, Japan, and China, and throughout this area many temples are erected for his worship and districts of towns bear his name. Outside India, rather different tales are told of him. Although steadfastly chaste in the Sanskrit tradition, for instance, he has wives and children in other traditions. He has been identified as the inspiration for the monkey hero of the great Chinese poem Xiyouji (“Journey to the West”). In the late 20th century he was depicted as a fierce superhero in Indian comic books, and his image was blazoned on the banners of the most militant Hindu organization, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS; “National Volunteer Party”). The Hanuman langur (Semnopithecus entellus), one of the most common Indian monkeys, is named after the Ramayana character.
It indeed contains the exact wordings referenced in teh article. So please revert the edits, Sandeep.--Anupkc (talk) 07:35, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Sandeep, why did you remove the senetence on internal threats in the Mission section ? What did you mean by your edit comment- " In that there is now word specifically used for the threat to nation" ?
Also please, mention your reason for edits in the discussion section. --Anupkc (talk) 09:14, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Also , please clarify why you removed the tect in the Mission section with the following comment "In that there is now word specifically used for the threat to nation" --Anup (talk) 09:45, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Once again, before undoing edit, please discuss it. Why did you remove my edits omn foreign funding? I have clearly explained above how the previous statements in the article were unreferenced, factually misleading etc. --Anup (talk) 09:44, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Sandeep, did you check the link I gave for Bunch of Thoughts? Did you check teh book? It has chapters dedicated to each of these internal threats ( whcih are explicitly called so). Before doing the edits, discuss it, verify the reference etc. Don't misuse teh word "Vandalism" - Anup (talk) 10:01, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
About "That sections is necessar to prove that the alegation from SFH was wrong. If we will not provide that then it will be biased article" You may or may not belive that the allegation is wrong. Even in my erecent edit, I have provided enough info on IRDF's rebuttal. I have stated how the pprevious statements were factually incorrect and unreferenced. If you have any comments on that, let me know --Anup (talk) 10:01, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Re: Help
Hi Sandeep , good that you are learning by wathcing me. Like they say: Fools learn from their mistakes; wise men learn from the mistakes of others :-). Unfortunately, I am not a very good copyeditor. I make a lot of typos and grammar mistakes. Actually Im too lazy to do it and mostly it is other editors who clean up my mistakes. I will look at the Valsad District article soon. If you need guidlines on copyediting you can read Misplaced Pages:How to copy-edit and Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style. --Deepak D'Souza 15:02, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Edits of Page India
- See what you did on Page Medog: Is this neutral?? --虞海 (Yú Hǎi) (talk) 08:02, 12 September 2009 (UTC)